|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Materials, manufacturing and design quality (2011), MPP097Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2011-12-19 - 2012-01-11 Antal svar: 17 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 41% Kontaktperson: Oskar Rexfelt»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.15 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.53 - The workload was very small.» (At most 15 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.11 - Some lecturers did, unfortunately, give a very non-inspiring impression and it was hard to focus during their classes.» (75%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.62 - I have read them but I don"t remember what they stated. » (?) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.13 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.53 - But I don"t think the goals reached up to those goals!» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.06 - My opinion is that the examination was at a too low level. It cannot be judged whether I have reached the course goals by only grading my achievement on the final assignment.» (No, not at all) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.58 - Not that much new information, but repetition» (Small extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.35 - The litterature didn"t offer much of an informational basis for the final assignment. » (Some extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.64 - Information given verbally during classes did not reach persons that were not there in any other way.» (Rather badly) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.23 - I think that we could ask some questions to the lecturers, but I think that very few of us did that. It could have been good to do the final exercise in groups, and then let these lecturers leave some comments on the work.» (Rather poor) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.64 11. How was the course workload?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.76 - I feel that in this stage of the education there would be a higher load and requirements of what you should achieve.» (Too low) 12. How was the total workload this study period?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.82 - Low I think. But that is comparing with the "normal" TD workload. » (Low) Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 - Low standard on many of the lectures. » (Poor) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- studiebesök»- The visit to Elmia subcontractor. » - study trip, case study» - The general idea and definitely the exursion to ELMIA.» - ELMIA visit» - The fair.» - The tasks, and the trip to Elmia» - The amount of external lectures.» - design project» - The field trip (with group assignment) to Jönköping was very appreciated! » 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The assignments should be more challenging and require more work. The final assignment was not adequate. To only do 2 posters and 1 A4 of comments didn"t require almost any insight into manufacturing methods or any effort to do them. MORE IS NEEDED!»- Kursen borde verkligen inte vara obligatorisk och det borde finnas en mer genomtänkt idé med varför vi läser den. Känns som att man lärt sig väldigt lite och att det finns utrymme för ändlösa förbättringar, en av de sämsta kurserna jag läst. Tittar man på kursen som helhet känns en vecka som en lagom storlek på kursen. Betygsättningen antar jag sker genom lottdragning för det finns inget utrymme för att prestera eller något djup i kursen att visa.» - One should ealuate which guest lectures are actually neccessary and which most of the students have heard before.» - some lectures, RD&T useless» - I would like to add some type of discussion session where you have a product/concept (e.g. just a sketch) and discuss how this could be manufactured and what material(s) could be used (in addition to the Assignment 1, but earlier in the course). I believe this would further enhance the students" ability to analyse and choose adequate manufacturing methods and materials. I would also like that more focus is put upon the process of selecting manuf. meth./materials as this is more or less just to be read about in the course literature. A lecture regarding different approaches for this would be great!» - The examination t´,needs to be more thorough.» - More relevant lectures. A more fair last assignment, this one was to small to differ the grades 3-5 (and U)» - The lecturers. They didn"t gave the information that I wanted to know. Not at all. The most interesting lecturer was the guy with all the plastic parts, but he was too slow.» - More tasks and group discussions about how things are made and how their quality could be improved. » - The lectures have to be new and not like the lectures in the course Tillverkningsteknik.» - more work» - Too few assignments. The lectures did not give as much as I hoped. Three lectures with the guy showing examples of plastic components was too much. The last assignment did not feel like an examination worthy a Master program. I learned something but I think the examination should include much more than 1-2 posters and 1-2 A4 pages with comments... » 16. Additional comments- I belive this requires more effort from the lecturers and examinor to be atleast good. I am not happy with the course.»- The course should not be mandatory for student that have read the three previous years at TD. It was difficult to know how thourough one should be as the hand-ins and presentations had to be so short.» - This is a good course, because we need it. But maybe it was difficult for the lecturers to find the right information. I think that it would have been interesting to ask everyone in the class what they have learned, and what they want to learn, and form the course for the next year out of that. Like to give the lecturers some important questions so that they know what we are interested in. » - This course"s pupose is good but unfortunately the lectures do not teach very much new knowledge.» - n/a» - I like the idea of having a course like this one, but it needs to be changed! Maybe the lecturers can give more examples of why certain products have been "given" a specific material and manufacturing method... It would be good to have exercises on how and what to apply to chosen products...»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
66%