Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Microsystems technology, MKM110, MPNAN, HT2011, MKM110

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-12-18 - 2012-01-22
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 60%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Teknisk fysik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 50%
Around 20 hours/week»2 33%
Around 25 hours/week»1 16%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 66%
100%»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

6 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 33%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»6 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 16%
Yes, definitely»4 66%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 33%
Large extent»4 66%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- Usually too many slides on each lecture. Lots of examples, unfortunately many of those and other slides were "un-explained", not really understoodable by their own. This means that if you miss the lecture, you really don"t understand the slides good on your own (and many examples were not explained on the lectures). » (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»1 16%
Some extent»1 16%
Large extent»4 66%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»5 83%
Very well»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»6 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

6 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 33%
Very well»4 66%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

11. How was the course workload?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 16%
Adequate»5 83%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

12. How was the total workload this study period?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 33%
Adequate»1 16%
High»3 50%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 16%
Adequate»1 16%
Good»4 66%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The project in itself»
- clean room (need more lab slots)»
- the good communication between the teachers and the students»
- The project work was great and should be preserved.»
- evaluation labs cleanroom labs»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Might be good to have project suggestions as some do not have any background in microsystems. And if this background is expected on the other hand, the lectures are probably too shallow.»
- we need more time slots for this since the work load for each class is quite high»
- there should be more explanation about the exam, how it works and which answers they expact»
- The exam could be a little bit more about the content.»
- The clean room "safety instructions" were too much and too detailed for what was necessary for us! These could have been taken care of in ~1 hour, instead of ~4 hours. This would be enough to do the 3 hour visitation ("lab") that we attended, but instead we had to listen to REALLY unnecessary and detailed information of "how you book this machine" and stuff like that. When I attended the "safety instructions" I thought we were able to get access to the clean room, but as it turned out, we weren"t. We were also told to fill out a lot of "tick-questions" to get "approved" but when the "lab-demo-day" came, he didn"t even ask for those... »

16. Additional comments

- Overall I really liked the course and the project. Lectures could have been a bit more advanced but maybe that"s because I have some background.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från