ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

New venture formation (NVF) SA

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-12-14 - 2011-12-21
Antal svar: 1
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 11%
Kontaktperson: Anneli Hildenborg»

Your own effort

1. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

1 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 0 0%

75%» 0 0%

100%» 1 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

2. How understandable are the course goals?

1 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 0 0%

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 0 0%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 1 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

3. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

1 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 0 0%

Yes, definitely» 1 100%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

4. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

1 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 0 0%

Large extent» 1 100%

Great extent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Could be better articles/cases. The reading material was not too good. Slides and presentations were top!» (Large extent)

5. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

1 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 0 0%

Rather well» 1 100%

Very well» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Study climate

6. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

1 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 0 0%

Very good» 1 100%

I did not seek help» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

7. How was the course workload?

1 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 1 100%

High» 0 0%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- There"s always more room for IP ,)» (Adequate)

Lectures

8. Course introduction/Intellectual Assets and appropriation (Erik Hansson)

1 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 1 100%

Excellent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

9. Becoming an employer (Johan Engdahl)

1 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 1 100%

Excellent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Some more handouts and key-takeaway messages would have been helpful» (Good)

10. Title clearance and background/foreground analysis (Henrik Rosén)

1 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 0 0%

Excellent» 1 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

11. Disclosure Sensitivity Analysis (Lars Andersson)

1 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 0 0%

Excellent» 1 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

- Didn"t like that despite a clear time limit of 3h some could hand in days later...» (Excellent)

12. Contractual implementations of business models (Andrew Telles)

1 svarande

Poor» 1 100%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 0 0%

Excellent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- Disappointing. Little content, no take away messages.» (Poor)

13. Legal due diligence (Racine Ashjari)

1 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 1 100%

Excellent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Nice.» (Good)

14. Branding and concept development (Toni-Matti Karjalainen, Aalto University)

1 svarande

Poor» 1 100%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 0 0%

Excellent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- Nice to listen to, but no value for us. No branding strategy, no conceptes we can use, no frameworks etc.» (Poor)

15. Product Development Workshop (Pascal Le Masson, MINES ParisTech)

1 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 1 100%

Excellent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

16. Business due diligence (Erik Hedenryd)

1 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 1 100%

Excellent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

17. The firm as a nexus of contracts (Lars Andersson)

1 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 1 100%

Excellent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Good, but maybe a framework and guideline of a "how to" in advance would be good!» (Good)

Summarizing questions

18. What is your general impression of the course?

1 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 0 0%

Excellent» 1 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- All IP related parts.»

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- the conractual parts. Especially pitfalls in cotnracts, what to avoid, etc. Maybe a genera contract law session?»

Kursutvärderingssystem från