Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
New venture formation (NVF), CIP036
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2011-12-14 - 2011-12-21 Antal svar: 6 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 22% Kontaktperson: Anneli Hildenborg»
Your own effort1. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 6 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 1 | | 16% |
75%» | | 2 | | 33% |
100%» | | 3 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4.33 - Many customers meeting that have been prioritized.» (50%)
- Missed 2 lectures due to traveling» (75%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.2. How understandable are the course goals?5 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 3 | | 60% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 2 | | 40% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.8 3. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?5 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 20% |
Yes, definitely» | | 1 | | 20% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 3 | | 60% |
Genomsnitt: 3.4
Teaching and course administration4. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?6 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 33% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 33% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 33% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?6 svarande
Very badly» | | 1 | | 16% |
Rather badly» | | 1 | | 16% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 66% |
Very well» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 - We have not got our grade for assignments three months back.» (Very badly)
Study climate6. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?6 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 1 | | 16% |
Rather good» | | 3 | | 50% |
Very good» | | 2 | | 33% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.16 - Erik has not been present at many stages.» (Rather poor)
7. How was the course workload?6 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 4 | | 66% |
High» | | 2 | | 33% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.33
Lectures8. Course introduction/Intellectual Assets and appropriation (Erik Hansson)6 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 1 | | 16% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 16% |
Good» | | 4 | | 66% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - Pretty ok but it feels that he hasn"t delivered what he said.» (Fair)
9. Becoming an employer (Johan Engdahl)5 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 20% |
Good» | | 4 | | 80% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.8 - Was not there.» (?)
10. Title clearance and background/foreground analysis (Henrik Rosén)6 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 5 | | 83% |
Good» | | 1 | | 16% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.16 11. Disclosure Sensitivity Analysis (Lars Andersson)4 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 2 | | 50% |
Excellent» | | 2 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4.5 - Did not attend, was a way.» (?)
- Was not there» (?)
12. Contractual implementations of business models (Andrew Telles)5 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 20% |
Good» | | 4 | | 80% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.8 - Was not there» (?)
13. Legal due diligence (Racine Ashjari)5 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 2 | | 40% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 20% |
Good» | | 2 | | 40% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 - Was not there» (?)
14. Branding and concept development (Toni-Matti Karjalainen, Aalto University)6 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 2 | | 33% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 3 | | 50% |
Excellent» | | 1 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 15. Product Development Workshop (Pascal Le Masson, MINES ParisTech)6 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 2 | | 33% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 16% |
Good» | | 3 | | 50% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.16 16. Business due diligence (Erik Hedenryd)5 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 5 | | 100% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4 - Was not there» (?)
17. The firm as a nexus of contracts (Lars Andersson)6 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 16% |
Good» | | 3 | | 50% |
Excellent» | | 2 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 4.16 - Not really that much of a lecture.» (Good)
Summarizing questions18. What is your general impression of the course?6 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 3 | | 50% |
Good» | | 3 | | 50% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - Some of the classes have been very good. But the assignments have to be handed back much faster.» (Adequate)
19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Lars Andersson»
20. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Snabbare feedback och lite mer närvaro av kursledaren för att få lite mer koll på vad som händer.»
- Too many guest lectures. hard to follow the purpose of the course.»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|