ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Freight transport systems 2011, TEK122

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-12-13 - 2011-12-30
Antal svar: 19
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 35%
Kontaktperson: Violeta Roso»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp

1. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

19 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 3 15%

75%» 5 26%

100%» 11 57%

Genomsnitt: 4.42

- Haha, shouldn"t you be charging for that kind of knlowedge?!» (50%)

Teaching and course administration

2. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 1 5%

Large extent» 14 73%

Great extent» 4 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

- Haha, shouldn"t you be charging for that kind of knlowedge?!» (Large extent)

3. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent» 2 10%

Some extent» 4 21%

Large extent» 8 42%

Great extent» 5 26%

Genomsnitt: 2.84

- The book seemed as more of reference litterature» (Small extent)
- More the articles than the book in itself because the book and the lectures were very similar what is good I think.» (Some extent)
- Haha, shouldn"t you be charging for that kind of knlowedge?!» (Some extent)
- But I think you can skip some of the articles » (Large extent)

4. To what extent do you like new teaching methods introduced, such as: short films, 5 min group works during the class, video on TA, seminars?

Please try to give an overall answer and then in the comment window specify if you particularly liked or disliked some of the methods.

19 svarande

Don"t like» 0 0%

Like to some extent» 11 57%

Like very much» 8 42%

No opinion» 0

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- Short films are very useful to have directly a good understanding about what is said in class. I don"t very like the 5mn group works because I don"t really work during these task. It"s more a problem of the students. The video on TA. It"s useful to people who didn"t attend the lecture. So it gives you arguments not to attend the lecture which is not your objective I think. » (Like to some extent)
- The TA is probably useful if you didn"t attend the lecture. » (Like to some extent)
- I attended the lectures so I did not use the video.» (Like to some extent)
- Shorts films are nice to get an overall understanding. I don"t recall 5 minutes group works during class..? The seminars where quite stiff and there where no real discussion. Our class have discussed more on seminars without bonus points, I believe that it was hard to discuss the subjects.» (Like to some extent)
- Sometimes it is good to share our opinions and learn from each other.» (Like to some extent)
- Haha, shouldn"t you be charging for that kind of knlowedge?!» (Like to some extent)
- micro group work is always good for starting a discussion and improve learning. » (Like very much)

5. To what extent have guest lectures been of help for your learning?

Please try to give an overall answer and then in the comment window specify if you particularly liked or disliked some of the lectures: Sea transport, Dangerous goods, Food transport, Forwarders perspective - Schenker, Carriers perspective, Division of labour in the transport industry.

18 svarande

Small extent» 1 5%

Some extent» 9 50%

Large extent» 6 33%

Great extent» 2 11%

No opinion» 0

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Schenker, sea transport, forwaders perspective was good lectures because they felt relative to the course, while the others were interesting but I felt that the lectures did not give anything but on the other hand they might give som "aha" feeling to some» (?)
- The provide a context. Some were better that others. Dangerous goods was mostly a list of categorizations which wasn´,t to much help. The schenker lecture was good however. Sea transport was good as well. The other were decent.» (Some extent)
- The Dangerous goods lecture could have been more interesting and it was difficult to have a Skype lecture. » (Some extent)
- Några, t.ex forwarders perspective kändes lite "flummiga" och gav inte så mycket. » (Some extent)
- It was a very good complement to learn how the theory is applied in reality.» (Some extent)
- Haha, shouldn"t you be charging for that kind of knlowedge?!» (Some extent)

6. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

19 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Badly» 1 5%

Well» 1 5%

Rather well» 5 26%

Excellent» 12 63%

Genomsnitt: 4.47

- Haha, shouldn"t you be charging for that kind of knlowedge?!» (Badly)
- The only thing is that there were for examples updates sent out via email that was not in the instructions for the assignment, I am thingking about when there were problems with the student portal and handins were changed» (Excellent)

7. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

19 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 1 5%

Very good» 16 84%

I did not seek help» 2 10%

Genomsnitt: 4.05

- Good opportunities both during lectures and in between lectures! Good work!» (Very good)
- Violeta is excellent on answering to e-mails!» (Very good)
- Haha, shouldn"t you be charging for that kind of knlowedge?!» (Very good)

8. How was the course workload?

19 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 18 94%

High» 1 5%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

- I think violeta made clear what changes it was from last year and this course actually felt like 6 hp! Good surprise!» (Adequate)
- Haha, shouldn"t you be charging for that kind of knlowedge?!» (Adequate)
- I think it is too many long lectures, it is only a 6 credits course, I do not think that it is necessary to have so many lectures.» (High)

9. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

19 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 5 26%

Yes, definitely» 13 68%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.78

- I lacked time on the exam since it was so many questions» (Yes, definitely)
- Haha, shouldn"t you be charging for that kind of knlowedge?!» (Yes, definitely)

Summarizing questions

10. What is your general impression of the course?

19 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 2 10%

Good» 12 63%

Excellent» 5 26%

Genomsnitt: 4.15

- Haha, shouldn"t you be charging for that kind of knlowedge?!» (Adequate)
- Too much repetition from previous courses in the bachelor. The prerequisites should be higher so that this is avoided.» (Good)
- Overall the course seemed a bit elementary but it is still good to learn all these concepts and names.» (Good)
- Very interesting and practical course. Port and Volvo visits are just great! Guest lectures as well. Excellent impression of the course. Thank You!» (Excellent)
- Good with sote visits!!» (Excellent)
- The course was very well structured: visits, guest lectures, seminars and host company.» (Excellent)

11. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Site visits!»
- Site visists were good.»
- I like the visits that we did at the harbor and Volvo»
- I liked the seminars!»
- Everything »
- Site visits. It"s good to have a view of what take place in a "company". »
- Site visits »
- Guest Lectures and Visits»
- Site visits, ait, Violeta»
- Visit at Harbour was cool. The hand-in where good aswell. I also liked the system with bonus points for involvement.»
- Studiebesöken»
- Study visits»
- the guest lecture from Schenker, the AIT case and the two seminars.»
- The seminars group meetings. The Port of Gothenburg and Volvo"s visit.»
- Haha, shouldn"t you be charging for that kind of knlowedge?!»

12. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The very subjective scoring for "excellent presentation and discussion". Very difficult to understand how to get the points. »
- Dangerous goods lecture was not very useful. I will never use that in the future and should I use it then I can look up the different categories of dangerous goods. It was mostly a 2 hour list of things.»
- The extra points that we could get by participating, I like the ideas but I don"t like the way they are handed out. When we did the allocation on one lecture everybody who got the right "theta" value got one extra point and people who did not get the right value signed up and got a point while I who calculated the problem and got right answer did not sign and therefore did not earn any points. So what I think is that these points should be addition meaning that the exam should be of 100 points then you can get extra points like in the OPC course»
- The extra points for good discussions. First of all, it is NOT extra points since it is only 90 point on the exam, if it was extra points (bonus poäng) it might be okay but as it is now it is not okay. There is no possibility for everybody to talk so much that everyone can earn 5 points during the short seminars. Secondly, it is not fair to all of a sudden give extra points during a lecture when it is stated in the syllabus that we will gain extra points during the SEMINARS.»
- Nothing »
- Maybe update the coure literature? I didn"t like the bonus point system, it felt really unfair and arbitrary - this was however not the case with the AIT case. If extra bonus points should be handed out, these should not first be removed from the 100 points as of today. »
- nothing»
- Outstanding discussions bonus points they were unclear, »
- Remove the bonus points for "outstanding discussion". I found the assessment very subjective and unfair. Especially when some students got bonus points during class for answering a calculation question. In the course syllabus it is stated that bonus point should be given during seminars for outstanding discussion, not during class. And especially not when the answers are available on the course homepage... »
- Tydligare exakta instruktioner för vad som krävs och hur mycket för att få varje bonuspoäng. »
- No Host Company report. Better with one big conference in the end of the term, covering all four courses.»
- I did not like the thing with getting "extra points". These points are not extra but part of the course grade. If to use that system it is better to have the points as extra and only get points during the seminars. I did not like the thing that you could get one point for saying what theta should be during the lecture, it was just to look in the handouts and I did not understand that i was supposed to earn one point for telling the correct answer.»
- Haha, shouldn"t you be charging for that kind of knlowedge?!»

13. Additional comments

- Violetta is one of the best teachers that I have ever had. »
- thanks Violeta»
- I expect the exam to be correct and not changing the conditions for the students.We are prepared and so should the examcbe. Both our exams were wrong this reading period and that is not aceptable I think. »
- Overall good course»
- Perhaps the AIT group should be the same for the OPC course. It is sometimes difficult to find available time to meet different groups.»
- Haha, shouldn"t you be charging for that kind of knlowedge?!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från