Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Platform Development & Modularization Management 2011, TEK020

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-12-13 - 2011-12-22
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 58%
Kontaktperson: Magnus Persson (Teknikens ekon»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp
Klass: Övriga
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 14%
Around 20 hours/week»6 42%
Around 25 hours/week»4 28%
Around 30 hours/week»1 7%
At least 35 hours/week»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- didnt require that much except for the seminar...» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

14 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 7%
75%»0 0%
100%»13 92%

Genomsnitt: 4.85

- Because I have a crash schedule, otherwise I"ll go to every lecture» (50%)
- maybe 90%?» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

14 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 7%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 21%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 71%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 15%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»11 84%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.84

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 46%
Yes, definitely»6 46%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.61

- The seminar didnt teach me anything really» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»3 21%
Some extent»3 21%
Large extent»4 28%
Great extent»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.64

- The repetition didn t really help but the guest lectures were meaningful» (Some extent)
- Very good lectures and guest lectures, especially the Volvo 3P guest lecture.» (Large extent)
- The teaching in the course was much better than available literature!!!» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 28%
Large extent»5 35%
Great extent»5 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

- it mostly was not that good» (Some extent)
- I think more articles could be used to cover even more of the Platform philosophy» (Some extent)
- Good articles!» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 14%
Rather well»2 14%
Very well»10 71%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- Maybe it is better to upload all the literature go the student, If that is possible» (Rather badly)
- Magnus is good with updating» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 7%
Rather good»3 21%
Very good»9 64%
I did not seek help»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- Magnus answered quetions quick and he is responsive» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 23%
Very well»10 76%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

- Magnus was very open to answer questions!» (?)
- project was not fun..everything was almost the same...which was obvious during the presentations...most boring day » (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low»1 7%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»8 57%
High»3 21%
Too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- More articles could be used and also have more questions for each seminar» (Low)
- The load itself is low but contribute adequate learning» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

14 svarande

Too low»1 7%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»4 28%
High»8 57%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

Summarizing questions

13. What do you think about Magnus Persson"s lectures

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»3 21%
Good»5 35%
Very good»6 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.21

- Interesting topics and good that he opened for discussion.» (Very good)
- he´,s fine...maybe he could talk more about how he has met this subject in his real life since he´,s got so much experience...i´,d rather hear about how he´,s worked wth it rather than so much theory...then you learn more» (Very good)
- Very qualitative.» (Very good)

14. What do you think about Fredrik von Corswant"s (Volvo Trucks) guest lecture

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»0 0%
Good»6 42%
Very good»8 57%

Genomsnitt: 4.57

- he was without any doubt the most interesting!» (Very good)

15. What do you think about Kent Severinson"s (Tetra Pak) guest lecture

14 svarande

Very poor»1 7%
Poor»2 14%
OK»5 35%
Good»5 35%
Very good»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

- It wasn"t very clear how tey work with platforms/modularization at Tetra Pak» (Poor)
- A bit unclear.» (OK)

16. What do you think about Thomas Nyvall"s (Calvia) guest lecture

14 svarande

Very good»1 7%
Good»2 14%
OK»4 28%
Poor»4 28%
Very poor»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- Too detailed. » (OK)
- Did not understand that much about the software he presented.» (Poor)
- Boooooooring...please don´,t let next years student go through with this waste of time lecture? It was a disaster» (Poor)
- Didn"t really understand what he was trying to communicate.» (Very poor)

17. Compared with this year"s course, I would prefer to have:


- It would be enough with 2 guest lectures. »
- I think it would be really beneficial to have more Guest lectures and give us Good learning in terms of Industrial Practice of Modularization.»
- the seminar does in general not reflect upon what you know...you always read the text but there are always people talking more than you are and it´,s hard to see what to say...and when someone says something its hard to say something else and would sound stupid if we repeated what the person said»
- The guest lectures from Tetra Pak and Calvia was not very giving.»

14 svarande

Much more»0 0%
More»7 50%
Same»6 42%
Less»1 7%
Much less»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

Guest lectures
14 svarande

Much more»1 7%
More»5 35%
Same»4 28%
Less»3 21%
Much less»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

Literature seminars
14 svarande

Much more»0 0%
More»1 7%
Same»9 64%
Less»3 21%
Much less»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

Group work
14 svarande

Much more»1 7%
More»2 14%
Same»11 78%
Less»0 0%
Much less»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

18. I think that the weights given to the different parts in the course assessment should:


- Good balance of the scores!»

Topic reports (currently 50 out of 100 points)
14 svarande

Increase»0 0%
Stay the same»12 85%
Decrease»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

Literature seminars (currently 40 out of 100 points)
14 svarande

Increase»1 7%
Stay the same»10 71%
Decrease»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

Individual reflection about the guest lectures (currently 10 out of 100 points)
14 svarande

Increase»1 7%
Stay the same»11 78%
Decrease»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

19. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 7%
Adequate»4 28%
Good»5 35%
Excellent»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- Will not recommend this course to anyone...but since PD-students only have this course, ergonomics and material science i would choose this and ergonomics since material stinks!» (Fair)

20. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- topic report- literature seminars-guest lectures Volvo and Tetra pack»
- Guest lectures»
- The seminar pattern»
- Topic Report and Assessment of Literature Seminars»
- Litterature seminars, group work»
- remove or less seminars»
- It is very good that the litterature seminars and the hand-ins to theses are early in the course, and that the topic report is handed in and presented in study week 7.»
- The literature seminars. I like that Magnus give scores for how well people are taking part in the seminars»
- The seminars and the guestlectures»
- The literature seminars and the topic report.»

21. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- grading on literature seminars" discussion»
- I believe that most of the students (at least the product development students) go in with a good knowledge of platforms and modularity, so the basics can be taught quicker. I also think the course should have a project. Maybe something where we are given a product and have to create modules or given a platform and need to define common components and justify our decisions based upon theory. I think some practical work would be more interesting and give us a broader knowledge, as now I feel like I have only gained significant knowledge in the one area I focused on in the topic report»
- The Topic Report points should be splitted as 1. Report - 20 2. Presentation - 20 3. Opposition - 10 It is really necessary to have an opposition group since there weren"t any much questions to the groups and it would also keep the audience alert in listening the presentation.»
- No grading on oral skills in seminars»
- Maybe change the guest lectures from Calvia and Tetra Pak to new guest lectures.»
- The Calvia guest lecture was both a little boring and wrong in time since that one was not included in the reflection.»
- Maybe one or two more lectures»
- More lectures and skip the last guest lecture.»

22. Additional comments

- Nope»
- I think that it should be more strict with keeping to the number of words on the literature seminar. The maximum amount of words were 500 per seminar, and some people wrote a lot more and got a full score. I think that is very bad, one should have a minus if one write more than 500 words if the limit is 500 words.»
- Thank you for the Course:)»
- Magnus is kind...it´,s not his fault that this topic is not 8week interesting»
- Really interesting subject and a good course! Thankyou Magnus!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från