Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Digital communications, SSY125, H11

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-12-12 - 2012-01-03
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 21%
Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»2 28%
Around 25 hours/week»1 14%
Around 30 hours/week»4 57%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- This time was spent on solving exercises that are to be solved before each tutorial.» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 57%
100%»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.42

- The last hour on mondays was sometimes skipped. Especially when you have had 4 hours of class in the morning as well...» (75%)
- The last part was too difficult and too confusing.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 42%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»6 85%
No, the goals are set too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 57%
Yes, definitely»2 28%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»2 28%
Some extent»2 28%
Large extent»2 28%
Great extent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

- The course was confusing since it was not properly structured. The chapters of the lecture notes are not related to any chapter included in the recommended book. Many chapters of the book are mixed within one chapter of the lecture notes...» (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»3 42%
Some extent»1 14%
Large extent»2 28%
Great extent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

- The lecture notes refer to part of the book to be read for a better understanding. But, these parts can only be understood if the whole chapter that includes this part is read. Moreover, the explanations in the book are not clear at all.» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 14%
Rather well»5 71%
Very well»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 14%
Rather good»2 28%
Very good»4 57%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 28%
Very well»5 71%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

11. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 14%
High»5 71%
Too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 4

- The exercises that have to be done before the tutorial are hard, boring and completely useless for the understanding of the course content. Mixing the reading/understanding of the lecture notes and the book is not even enough to understand everything, and not even enough to solve the given exercises.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
High»4 57%
Too high»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.42

- Due to an other course.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»2 28%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»4 57%
Excellent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- Bad teacher assistant: too much speaking, too few explanation, and exercise solving. Bad lecturer: not clear, too fast and the "quizz" are useless and stressful and do NOT correspond to the Chalmers way of studying.» (Poor)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the guest lectures. the project. the weekly meetings with the coordiantor»
- the lectures were very good»
- the items of project»
- The project was good, and the oral examination was interesting.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- tutorials were too hard, and too vague. Sometimes quite far from the course»
- this course is too wide and to cover all of these what teacher taught is almost on surface,i dont think i learned much useful things except channel coding part.»
- Mainly the quizz and the exercises that have to be solved for the tutorial. The tutorial MUST be changed.»
- Teachers or give them pedagogic lessons.»

16. Additional comments

- Nothing»

Kursutvärderingssystem från