ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Biomedical instrumentation, SSY090, H11

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-12-12 - 2012-01-03
Antal svar: 19
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 51%
Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

18 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 11%
Around 20 hours/week»10 55%
Around 25 hours/week»4 22%
Around 30 hours/week»2 11%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

18 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 11%
100%»16 88%

Genomsnitt: 4.88

- had some collision with others courses» (75%)
- Almost» (100%)
- Guest lectures were a very good element» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

18 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 5%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 27%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»12 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

17 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 5%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»16 94%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.94

- My background contained very little electronics, but it still worked very good.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

17 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»8 47%
Yes, definitely»8 47%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.58

- There wasn"t much "think for your self". Maybe hard in this course, but I missed that. » (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 10%
Large extent»8 42%
Great extent»9 47%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 26%
Large extent»8 42%
Great extent»6 31%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

- Especially for the home assignments, lots of information were retrieved from sites.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

19 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 15%
Very well»16 84%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

- The web page was very good, though sometimes there were so many notices that it was hard to find the right one. Like the information about one thing was spread instead of collected in one notice.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

19 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 5%
Very good»18 94%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.94

- The consultation sessions before the assignments were a very good element.» (Very good)
- consultation time is a very good idea to help doing the homework» (Very good)
- But it feels like if you had to seek help to understand the questions in the hand ins, which I think is bad. Almost like you should be the teachers pet to pass the hand ins at first try.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

19 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»7 36%
Very well»12 63%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

11. How was the course workload?

19 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»16 84%
High»3 15%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

- There have been much to do, but not too much. » (Adequate)
- In the second quarter though, it was rather high.» (Adequate)
- sometimes the handins in this course and other things from other course colided but i think it did go well anyway» (High)

12. How was the total workload in quarter 1?

19 svarande

Too low»1 5%
Low»2 10%
Adequate»12 63%
High»2 10%
Too high»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- Though higher than in quarter 2.» (Adequate)

13. How was the total workload in quarter 2?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 38%
High»8 44%
Too high»3 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

- There should be a Very High option before Too High. » (?)

14. Questions about the lectures: What did you think about ...

Matrisfråga

- More technical, connect more with the medicine course.»
- I whould prefer less writing on the board and more talking and interacting with the class.»
- I would have liked if both Sabine and Bo was not so tied to their notes and writing everyting on the board. I don"t want it to be a conversation between students and teacher, but it feels good when it feels like the teacher is explaining to the class, instead of giving the information, or facts.»

... the lecturer?
19 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»1 5%
Good»5 26%
Very Good»13 68%

Genomsnitt: 4.63

... the content of the lectures?
19 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»2 10%
Good»8 42%
Very Good»9 47%

Genomsnitt: 4.36

15. Questions about the guest lectures. What did you think about ...

Matrisfråga

- The labView lecture was pretty basic, it would be nice if you could choose to do the handin from that lecture without having to go to the lecture. And at the CHOCS presentation it would be real good if their material were posted on the course-page before the lecture. Then you would know how far you should be on your report in order to get the most out of the exercise.»
- I whould prefer for the MR and X-Ray/CT to be more focused on the instrumentation.»
- I think that it is kind of wasted to say how good I think a lecture was but not what was good and bad about it. So, I think that sometimes the lecturer put a little to much weight at their own focus, like about EEG and hearing aids. Espacially the hearing aids lecture felt like it good have been product placement, maybe I would like if you had said something about where the company is in the field and what other things are happening outside of this company. I think the certification lecture got to detailed, so that it became boring. The Chocs thing was very good, but it was weird that there was no time for discussing the other groups text together with them. I also think that the labview lecture was on a too low level.»

... that there are guest lecturers for some topics?
19 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»1 5%
OK»0 0%
Good»2 10%
Very Good»16 84%
I didn"t attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4.73

... the EEG lecture by Johan Löfhede?
18 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»0 0%
Good»5 27%
Very Good»12 66%
I didn"t attend»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 4.77

... The respiratory system lecture by Ants Silberberg?
17 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»0 0%
Good»10 58%
Very Good»7 41%
I didn"t attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4.41

...the biomaterials lecture by Carina Johansson?
17 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»1 5%
Good»7 41%
Very Good»9 52%
I didn"t attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4.47

... the biosensors lecture by Sofia Svedhem?
18 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»1 5%
Good»7 38%
Very Good»10 55%
I didn"t attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

...the MR lecture by Maria Ljungberg?
18 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»3 16%
Good»6 33%
Very Good»9 50%
I didn"t attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

... the Lab/View lecture/exercise by Pelle Steen and Hamidreza Taghavi?
18 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»3 16%
Good»5 27%
Very Good»9 50%
I didn"t attend»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 4.44

... the project report supervision by CHOCS?
18 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»7 38%
Good»5 27%
Very Good»6 33%
I didn"t attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.94

...the bone conduction hearing aids lecture by Myrthe Hol?
18 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»0 0%
Good»5 27%
Very Good»12 66%
I didn"t attend»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 4.77

... the X ray/CT lecture by Maria Hultenmo?
18 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»0 0%
Good»9 50%
Very Good»7 38%
I didn"t attend»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 4.61

...the e-Health lecture by Bengt-Arne Sjöqvist?
17 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»1 5%
Good»2 11%
Very Good»13 76%
I didn"t attend»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 4.82

... the patient safety lecture by Bo Håkansson?
17 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»4 23%
Good»6 35%
Very Good»6 35%
I didn"t attend»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 4.23

... the certification of biomedical products lecture by Anders Gingsjö?
19 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»2 10%
OK»4 21%
Good»6 31%
Very Good»5 26%
I didn"t attend»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 4.05

16. What did you think about the laboratory exercise?

19 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»1 5%
Good»3 15%
Very good»15 78%

Genomsnitt: 4.73

- Did ECG laboratory in my bachelor» (OK)
- The best lab I have had, fits very good with the CDIO-model of learning.» (Very good)
- ECG lab very nice!» (Very good)

17. Was the laboratory exercise educational?

19 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
No»0 0%
A little»1 5%
Yes»3 15%
Yes, very»15 78%

Genomsnitt: 4.73

- Contained a very broad array of skills.» (Yes, very)

18. What did you think about the hand-in exercises?

19 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»0 0%
Good»11 57%
Very good»8 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.42

- It was very hard to know how much you should write and how thourogh you should be in the first (two) hand-ins. Then you got some sense of what was required. » (Good)
- They often built on the previous one. Not as vast spread in exercises as I would like to see. » (Good)
- I think the concept is very very good. But I think that vagueness in what is required makes it much easier for the ones that go and ask for help, which I think is not good for the students nor the teachers.» (Good)
- i would like you to be more specific on what you want in the handed in report, » (Good)
- Could be formulated better.» (Good)
- Very rewarding to seek out answers yourself and design with not one exact right answer.» (Very good)
- But after the 2nd hand-in i had the feeling that they were somehow repetitive.» (Very good)

19. How much time in average did you spend on each exercise?

18 svarande

0-2 hours»0 0%
2-4 hours»0 0%
4-6 hours»2 11%
6-8 hours»5 27%
8-10 hours»5 27%
More than 10 hours»6 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.83

- I think the exercises, especially the ones in the beginning was the most time consuming, and valuable, part of the course.» (?)

20. What did you think about the project work?

19 svarande

Very bad - it felt meaningless»0 0%
Bad - it gave nothing»0 0%
OK»2 10%
Good - I learned a lot»11 57%
Very good - I learned a lot of interest»6 31%

Genomsnitt: 4.21

- It was good, nice to learn more on one area. And fun to see the other"s presentations.» (Good - I learned a lot)

21. how much time did you spend on the project work?

17 svarande

Less than 20 hours»1 5%
20-30 hours»4 23%
30-40 hours»3 17%
40-50 hours»6 35%
50-60 hours»1 5%
More than 60 hours»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.47

- didnt record the time but we did speend much time on it» (?)

22. What did you think about the study tour?

19 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»0 0%
Good»9 47%
Very good»10 52%

Genomsnitt: 4.52

- I expected more equipment to be demonstrated. I whould like to have 2 tours at the hospital.» (Good)
- Might have been even more interesting to see a R&D lab so that engineers would have spoken about the devices. » (Good)
- Would like to see more equipment!» (Very good)
- AWESOME!» (Very good)

23. What did you think about the home exam?

19 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»2 10%
Good»12 63%
Very good»4 21%
I didn"t do it»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 4.21

- The home exam was too long and the questions were very general. Some more guidlines, such as the request for references whould be very helpful.» (OK)
- It was too long» (OK)
- To little free thinking and room for analysis. Was mostly just a matter of finding facts in the book. » (Good)
- It was hard, that was good. » (Very good)
- A little too long and many general questions. Maybe a bit shorter but more "specialized"?» (Very good)

Summarizing questions

24. What is your general impression of the course?

19 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 5%
Good»8 42%
Excellent»10 52%

Genomsnitt: 4.47

25. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The guest lecturers and the study tour, and the happy and kind examinator. »
- Laboration, labVIEW, book, lectures »
- ECG lab and the LabVIEW session.»
- The guest lectures, the lab, the project, the hospital tour »
- the project and handin problems»
- Sabine»
- Laboratory excercise was very usefull ans good.»
- study tour, home assignment»
- Everything is OK»
- The ecg lab and visit to sahlgrneska»

26. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- possibly more practical lab sessions»
- I absolutely think you should get comments on the hand-ins, and not just "passed" or "fix this,...". It"s impossible to know if you did a great job or just adequate. The experience would help during the home exam. »
- Connect more with the medicine course so that more focus can be given to technical aspects. Short example of how the exercises can be solved (after everyone is done ofcourse).»
- nothing.»
- I whould prefer less writing on the board and more talking and interacting with the class.»
- make students to give out some own project name»
- be clearer about which technique should we know in details»
- none»

27. Is something missing in the course that should be added?

- Brain-machine interfaces are very interesting!»
- Some more basic instrumentation concepts.»
- Positron emission tomography, Ultrasound system, Automated Analyzers»
- some course about new biomedical technologies, such as gene threapy»
- Maybe having an overview of what kind of job we can expect later. »
- none»

28. Additional comments

- well done»
- Hand in assignments were very usefull also.. I think it will be better if we have 5 assignment not only 4. the time between assignment 3 and 4 was too long so there is enough time to add one more assignment to learn more and more. »
- I wanted to know how an engineer can be useful in the biomedical field. This course illustrate it very well. I am glad, I learned a lot.»
- none»

Kursutvärderingssystem från