ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Medicine for the engineer, SSY180, H11

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-12-12 - 2012-01-03
Antal svar: 22
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 33%
Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

21 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»16 76%
Around 20 hours/week»2 9%
Around 25 hours/week»2 9%
Around 30 hours/week»1 4%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.42

- Closer to 3 hours per week in total» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

21 svarande

0%»1 4%
25%»3 14%
50%»2 9%
75%»8 38%
100%»7 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- Late lectures are not good. You don"t have time to eat and occupies evening.» (50%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

21 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 9%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»7 33%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»12 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

20 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»3 15%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»17 85%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

20 svarande

No, not at all»1 5%
To some extent»9 45%
Yes, definitely»10 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.45

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

22 svarande

Small extent»2 9%
Some extent»5 22%
Large extent»5 22%
Great extent»10 45%

Genomsnitt: 3.04

7. Questions about the lectures. What did you think about ...

Matrisfråga

- I wish there was an excellent column for the urinary tract lecture by Peeker.»
- Skoglund was an excellent lecture, the best I have had during the hole studytime at chalmers»
- I think Peeker was great, but he seemed to be talking about the wrong thing. Only talking about what he was interested in instead of the general subject. We learnt nothing about the kidneys, but everything about prostate cancer and eractile problems. If we talk about that shouldn"t we at least mention breast cancer or avery cancer, or other female problems. Or if we talk about eractile problems because a big portion of the people suffer from it or the hormonal problems due to castration, shouldn"t we talk about the problems with birth control pills, that almost 50% of the people eat at some point of their life. It just seemed to give me new predudices about how the research is all about the male body. I"m sorry if I come off as a feministic bitch, but I just think this is kind of important.»

... the biocemistry, cell and tissue by Larsson?
22 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»5 22%
Good»5 22%
Very good»11 50%
I didn"t attend»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 4.36

... the digestive system lecture by Khorram-Manesh?
21 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»4 19%
Good»5 23%
Very good»10 47%
I didn"t attend»2 9%

Genomsnitt: 4.47

... The circulatory system by Hornestam?
21 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»1 4%
OK»3 14%
Good»8 38%
Very good»8 38%
I didn"t attend»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 4.23

... the endocrine, blood, reproductive etc system by Nilsson?
21 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»4 19%
Good»5 23%
Very good»8 38%
I didn"t attend»4 19%

Genomsnitt: 4.57

... the CNS/PNS by Skoglund?
21 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»1 4%
OK»2 9%
Good»4 19%
Very good»12 57%
I didn"t attend»2 9%

Genomsnitt: 4.57

... the sensory organs by Hallén?
21 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»1 4%
OK»2 9%
Good»4 19%
Very good»6 28%
I didn"t attend»8 38%

Genomsnitt: 4.85

... the respiratory and musculoskletal system by Örtenwall?
21 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»2 9%
Good»7 33%
Very good»8 38%
I didn"t attend»4 19%

Genomsnitt: 4.66

... the urinary tract by Peeker?
21 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»1 4%
Good»5 23%
Very good»9 42%
I didn"t attend»6 28%

Genomsnitt: 4.95

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

22 svarande

Small extent»3 13%
Some extent»4 18%
Large extent»5 22%
Great extent»10 45%

Genomsnitt: 3

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

21 svarande

Very badly»1 4%
Rather badly»1 4%
Rather well»10 47%
Very well»9 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- Lecture material put on homepage after lecture or only short time before lecture.» (Very badly)
- The files were often uploaded very late» (Rather badly)

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

20 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»6 30%
Very good»9 45%
I did not seek help»5 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.95

- There was not specially planned time för that, should be some opportunities to ask questions to lecturers by e-mails - there was not such possibility.» (Rather good)

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

21 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»4 19%
Rather well»3 14%
Very well»9 42%
I did not seek cooperation»5 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

12. How was the course workload?

22 svarande

Too low»1 4%
Low»9 40%
Adequate»8 36%
High»3 13%
Too high»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- For a course on 7.5 points, one should be examined on more than 5 hours of total studying time...» (Too low)
- It was very rare that the lecturer used the full three hours that the schedule held. I think that is very sad. Of course, no one complained since three hours is more than at least I can handle of one subject at once. I wish you would schedule us with 3 time slots a week, each of two hours instead. If this is impossible, maybe you should cut down on the time so that the lecturers only get as much time as the really want, and the students get additional hand ins or something like that.» (Low)

13. How was the total workload this study period?

21 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 14%
Adequate»5 23%
High»5 23%
Too high»8 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

21 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 4%
Adequate»1 4%
Good»11 52%
Excellent»8 38%

Genomsnitt: 4.23

- Very interesting course!» (Good)
- Could go deeper into details many times, eg in the brain and nervous system. » (Good)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the form of the examination, the lecture given by experienced lecturer»
- Doctors Skoglund, Nilsson, Peeker.»
- couse content»
- I think that all of the subjects that were dealt with are good to keep for next years course.»
- none»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- lecture time could be after dinner time.»
- There must be some micrafons in auditorium för such speakers as Haleen, Örtenwal, Hornestam.»
- reduce the point on the final exam»
- I would like to see some additional questions of essay-type, not only multiple questions or t/f.»
- none»

17. Additional comments

- Very nice and interesting lectures! hope I can merge them with my background somehow someday!»
- Very interesting course because real doctors hade lectures about real work they are doing.»
- add some reports»
- the time of the lecture should be changed»

Kursutvärderingssystem från