ENKÄTER

 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.


Computational nonlinear mechanics 2011

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-12-14 - 2012-01-14
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 66%
Kontaktperson: Magnus Ekh»


Own effort

1. Approximately how many hours per week did you work with the course?

Estimate the total time in, including both teaching activities and your own studies. Try to estimate the average for the whole study period.

10 svarande

At most 10 hours»1 10%
About 15 hours»0 0%
About 20 hours»4 40%
About 25 hours»4 40%
About 30 hours»1 10%
At least 35 hours»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

2. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 40%
High»6 60%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- Assignments and regular study weeks had a good workload, but total course content/outcomes were slightly too high» (High)

3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 10%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 20%
100%»7 70%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

4. How much time did you spend on this course, as compared to your parallell course?

10 svarande

Much less»0 0%
Less Similar»3 30%
More»1 10%
Much more»1 10%
I only had this course»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- almost similar bur a little bit more» (More)


Goals and goal fulfilment

5. How understandable and reasonable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 10%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 10%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»8 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- If by goals are meant the learning outcomes, then these are very specific and detailed and over the course content well. If this refers to the goals in the course memo then it is not as clear.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)
- The detailed learning outcomes are very useful.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

6. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

8 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

7. How much did computer assignment 1 help you to reach the goals?

9 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 44%
To large extent»5 55%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

8. How much did computer assignment 2 help you to reach the goals?

9 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 33%
To large extent»6 66%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

9. How much did computer assignment 3 help you to reach the goals?

9 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 44%
To large extent»5 55%

Genomsnitt: 2.55


teaching and course administration

10. To what extent has the lectures been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 20%
Large extent»5 50%
Great extent»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

11. To what extent has the Bonet & Wood book been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»2 20%
Large extent»5 50%
Great extent»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

12. How well do you think that the lectures and the contents of the book fit together?

10 svarande

Very little»0 0%
To some extent»2 20%
To large extent»4 40%
Almost completely»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- only small differences in some derivations, but that is more or less inevitable» (Almost completely)

13. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»2 20%
Very well»8 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.8


Study climate

14. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help during class?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 10%
Very good»7 70%
I did not seek help»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 4.1

15. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help between the classes?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»9 90%
I did not seek help»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 4.1

16. How was the atmosphere between students and teachers during the lectures?

10 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

respectful»7 70%
friendly»7 70%
helpful»4 40%
open-minded»5 50%

17. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 40%
Very well»5 50%
I did not seek cooperation»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.7


Summarizing questions

18. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»5 50%
Excellent»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- The only negative impression for me is the amount of learning outcomes. Excluding a few could make it possible to work with and understand the other parts better/completely. Learning concepts as such are very good though.» (Good)
- Together with Mech of solids and fluids this was by far the best course I have taken on Chalmers, I really learned alot. The lecture notes made everything quite clear. It is nice when you know what you should learn which was not the case in the material mechanics courses. » (Excellent)

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- I think the most important thing is to keep the same lecturer and notes. »
- Computer assignments»
- Magnus»
- The content,the book»

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Maybe to move the exam forward a couple of days. It is not much time between the last deadline and the exam with 71 learning outcomes to learn. And also maybe to take a look at the proposed solutions to the exams. »
- More time between end of course and exam.»
- Exclude a few learning outcomes.»

21. Additional comments

- I hope there will be more courses that continues from what we have learned here. Maybe a course in modelling large deformations with more advanced material behavior. »


Kursutvärderingssystem från