Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Space science and techniques, RRY015, MPWPS, HT11, RRY015

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-12-11 - 2012-01-22
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 60%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

15 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 26%
Around 20 hours/week»6 40%
Around 25 hours/week»4 26%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

15 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 6%
75%»4 26%
100%»10 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

- Really excellent lectures and tutorials!!» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

15 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 13%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»13 86%

Genomsnitt: 3.86

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

15 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»15 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

15 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 20%
Yes, definitely»12 80%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- The exam really tested the content of the course.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»1 6%
Large extent»4 26%
Great extent»9 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- Excellent lectures!» (Great extent)
- All the teachers was very good so you learned a lot.» (Great extent)
- Really good and talented teachers!» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»3 20%
Large extent»5 33%
Great extent»6 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

15 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»5 33%
Very well»10 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

9. What is your opinion about the group work?

Choose all answers you agree with below!

15 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

Not useful, I learned only little from the discussions»1 6%
Useful, I learned much from the discussions»11 73%
Very useful, I learned very much from the discussions»3 20%
Too little time scheduled»1 6%
Adequate time scheduled»9 60%
Too much time scheduled»4 26%
The groups were too small»0 0%
The groups were of adequate size»12 80%
The groups were too large»0 0%

- One person in the group did practically nothing at all.» (Useful, I learned much from the discussions, Too much time scheduled, The groups were of adequate size)
- The first session a full day was needed but for the other two it was enough with a half day. » (Useful, I learned much from the discussions, Too much time scheduled, The groups were of adequate size)
- The group work is a good thing, but for some groups it feels like one person has to do a lot of the work. The scheduled time is too long, especially if you are not presenting! » (Not useful, I learned only little from the discussions, Too much time scheduled)

10. Suggest how the group work can be improved next year!

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

- More condensed.»
- it is good as it is»
- maybe we could have some group visits to sites and facilities related to this study, such as: SAAB!!»
- Shorten the last two sessions»
- It is fun that they give so loose details (you decide yourself how much details to include) but I would like to have it more structured!»
- Maybe the groups could be a little bit larger and a little less time scheduled. The assignments are fine though. »
- Discussion and presentation in more detail»
- The number of tutorials can be increased»
- Maybe more help from the teachers.»

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

15 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 20%
Very good»12 80%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

15 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»6 40%
Very well»8 53%
I did not seek cooperation»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- Not so well in group work though. » (Rather well)

13. How was the course workload?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 20%
Adequate»11 73%
High»1 6%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.86

- The calculations are not that hard... » (Low)

14. How was the total workload this study period?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 33%
High»8 53%
Too high»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- The other course has a lot of mandatory assignments... » (High)
- The workload of the course Microwave was too high. I think that the course teachers were not nice by putting laborations 1 day before Space exam. Vicent Pierre Desmaris attitude towards his students were pretty bad when some student asked for pushing the deadline of laboration hand in. I think by doing this, it affected my grade in space science course. » (Too high)

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

15 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 6%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»4 26%
Excellent»10 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.53

- Very well organized course. Enjoyed it very much even though i don"t plan to continue in space sciences.» (Excellent)
- Great teachers! Both of them made this course great. I think i will take more courses in space» (Excellent)
- All three teachers did a great job! And overall it was a good introductional course, with a good structure and interesting material» (Excellent)
- Very good teachers and intresting subject even for those who are not into space stuff.» (Excellent)
- The course has been taught in an excellent way, but the course might not be that relevant för my education... » (Excellent)

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Arto, Magnus and Per.»
- The group works»
- The style of the lectures.»
- the book was great and so useful!!»
- The teachers and their teaching!»
- Per who was a very good tutorial teacher. The group work was good to test what knowledge we got and also reminded on the important things to know.»
- The teachers and coursebook!»
- The teachers! »
- Groupworks, different teachers, pretty well organized exercise classes»
- The course curriculum, teachers were excellent so same teachers and curriculum may continue»
- The way the tutorials are done: we understand it much better!»
- teamwork and the usage of spenvis»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Group work assignments.»
- The exam. It is unreasonable that we are supposed to remember long equations by heart. Equations like thermal equilibrium and friis equation should be on the formula sheet.»
- nothing, just more practical learning if possible»
- Well nothing much really»
- Nothing in the teaching, »
- Modify the groupwork slightly.»
- More ime spent on stability of the satellite»

18. Additional comments

- Thank Magnus and Arto for doing this course great!!»
- Im pleasantly surprised by this course. Im usually rather uninterested in space science, but after this course i realized its actually a interesting branch of engineering. »
- We spent sometimes too long time on easy calculations and derivations. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från