Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

LENS PhD course 2011

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-12-08 - 2011-12-13
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 60%
Kontaktperson: Violeta Roso»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Klass: Övriga
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Fristående kurs

Teaching and course administration

1. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 22%
Large extent»6 66%
Great extent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- It was interesting and even if everything was not directly applicable on my research it gave new and relevant perspectives.» (Large extent)
- I"ll use my new knowledge within teaching as well as within research» (Large extent)

2. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 55%
Large extent»3 33%
Great extent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

- I would actually liked to have more material for the second and third seminar.» (Some extent)
- New knowledge e.g methods, on-going research and about focus areas within sust Logistics» (Large extent)

3. How well did the course administration, handouts, reading lists, etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Badly»0 0%
Well»7 77%
Very well»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- Overall good, however for the second seminar it would have been good if the material was distributed before the seminar.» (Well)
- Delivery of material for the second seminar could have been better» (Well)

Study climate

4. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 22%
Very good»7 77%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

- Good support from the course admin!» (Very good)

5. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 44%
Very well»5 55%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- It was good that we were mixed between the different universities.» (Very well)
- Worked splendid ! » (Very well)

6. How was the course workload?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 11%
Adequate»6 66%
High»2 22%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

- I am not complaining. Compared to other courses with similar credits I found the workload in this course lower.» (Low)

Summarizing questions

7. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 11%
Good»5 55%
Excellent»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.22

- Please balance the time better, at times it felt like you were trying to push too much content and had too little time for it. Especially for the 2nd session with the environmental calculations. There wasnt enough time to properly do the assignment and prepare a presentation.» (Excellent)
- great work guys!» (Excellent)

8. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- As is.»
- having guest lecturers»
- the use of different media outlets»
- Focus on sustainability. Cooperation between students (group work).»
- The course structure and mix between lectures by companies and the academy»
- -group works -Guest lecturers»

9. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- none.»
- certain material could be handed out running»
- More time for group projects during the session if they are kept like this year.»
- Maybe vary the composition of the groups to allow for increased interaction between students.»
- The time for making the NTM analysis, should be increased»

10. Additional comments

- none.»
- Thanks!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från