ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPRSS: RRY100 Satellite Communication Sp2, 11/12

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-12-06 - 2011-12-21
Antal svar: 4
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Arto Heikkilä»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

4 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»3 75%
Around 25 hours/week»1 25%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

4 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 25%
75%»0 0%
100%»3 75%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

4 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 75%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»3 75%
No, the goals are set too high»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

4 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 25%
Yes, definitely»3 75%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»1 25%
Some extent»1 25%
Large extent»2 50%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 25%
Large extent»1 25%
Great extent»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

4 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»1 25%
Very well»3 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

4 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 25%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»3 75%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

4 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 25%
Rather well»2 50%
Very well»1 25%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

11. How was the course workload?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 75%
High»1 25%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

12. How was the total workload this study period?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 50%
High»1 25%
Too high»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

4 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 25%
Good»3 75%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

16. Additional comments

17. This course is offered to several master"s programmes at Chalmers, and it is also elective for other students at Chalmers. Which programme are you from?

18. The goal of this course was to give you an overall understanding of satellite communcation systems. Was this goal reached?

4 svarande

yes»4 100%
no»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

19. What is your impression on the course level?

3 svarande

too easy»0 0%
right level»2 66%
too high»1 33%
do not know»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

20. BEFORE the course: Please specify your subjective impression on your personal knowledge BEFORE the course on the following topics that are ingredients of the course.

Matrisfråga

satellite orbits and orbital calculations
4 svarande

very bad»3 75%
bad»1 25%
fair»0 0%
good»0 0%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.25

link budget calculations
4 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»0 0%
fair»0 0%
good»4 100%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

noise in satellite communications
4 svarande

very bad»1 25%
bad»1 25%
fair»1 25%
good»1 25%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

electronic equipment in satellite communications
4 svarande

very bad»2 50%
bad»0 0%
fair»2 50%
good»0 0%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

antennas for satellite communications
4 svarande

very bad»2 50%
bad»1 25%
fair»0 0%
good»1 25%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

modulation, multiplex, multiple access
4 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»0 0%
fair»3 75%
good»1 25%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

polarization of electromagnetic waves
4 svarande

very bad»1 25%
bad»0 0%
fair»3 75%
good»0 0%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

atmospheric propagation and attenuation
4 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»0 0%
fair»2 50%
good»2 50%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

industrial aspects: products and economy
4 svarande

very bad»3 75%
bad»1 25%
fair»0 0%
good»0 0%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.25

21. AFTER the course: Please specify your subjective impression on your personal knowledge AFTER the course on the following topics that are ingredients of the course.

Matrisfråga

satellite orbits and orbital calculations
4 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»0 0%
fair»1 25%
good»3 75%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

link budget calculations
4 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»0 0%
fair»0 0%
good»3 75%
very good»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

noise in satellite communications
4 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»0 0%
fair»1 25%
good»2 50%
very good»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4

electronic equipment in satellite communications
4 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»1 25%
fair»0 0%
good»3 75%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

antennas for satellite communications
4 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»1 25%
fair»0 0%
good»2 50%
very good»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

modulation, multiplex, multiple access
4 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»0 0%
fair»1 25%
good»3 75%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

polarization of electromagnetic waves
4 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»1 25%
fair»1 25%
good»2 50%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

atmospheric propagation and attenuation
4 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»0 0%
fair»2 50%
good»1 25%
very good»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

industrial aspects: products and economy
4 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»1 25%
fair»2 50%
good»1 25%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

22. Did you expect something that we did not cover in the course? If so, please specify.

4 svarande

yes»0 0%
no»4 100%

Genomsnitt: 2

23. Course elements: Which course element contributed how much to your learning process. Use a scale between (1) - "contributed least" to (6) - "contributed most"

Matrisfråga

The lectures
4 svarande

(1)»0 0%
(2)»0 0%
(3)»1 25%
(4)»2 50%
(5)»1 25%
(6)»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

The discussions during the working group meetings
4 svarande

(1)»0 0%
(2)»0 0%
(3)»0 0%
(4)»2 50%
(5)»1 25%
(6)»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4.75

The homeworks
4 svarande

(1)»0 0%
(2)»0 0%
(3)»1 25%
(4)»2 50%
(5)»1 25%
(6)»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

The labs at the Onsala Space Observatory
3 svarande

(1)»0 0%
(2)»1 33%
(3)»1 33%
(4)»1 33%
(5)»0 0%
(6)»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

The excursion to RUAG Aeropace
3 svarande

(1)»0 0%
(2)»3 100%
(3)»0 0%
(4)»0 0%
(5)»0 0%
(6)»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

The RUAG Aerospace guest lectures.
3 svarande

(1)»2 66%
(2)»1 33%
(3)»0 0%
(4)»0 0%
(5)»0 0%
(6)»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.33

24. LABS: The lab exercises included three different tasks. What is your impression on the labs?

Matrisfråga

LAB01 (microwave radiometer)
3 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»0 0%
neutral»1 33%
good»2 66%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

LAB02 (TV-satellite)
3 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»0 0%
neutral»1 33%
good»1 33%
very good»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 4

LAB03 (2.3 m radio telescope)
3 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»0 0%
neutral»1 33%
good»1 33%
very good»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 4

25. HWs: What is your impression about the homeworks (HWs)?

4 svarande

too easy»0 0%
right level»4 100%
too advanced»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

26. WGs: The course used the pedagogic concept of working groups (WGs). What is your impression about the WGs?

4 svarande

I like this approach to learning.»4 100%
I do not like this approach to learning.»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

27. WGs: We tried to create heterogenous WGs in order to stimulate intercultural communication and understading of cultural differences in particular with repect to learning situations. What is your opini

4 svarande

I like this approach to learning.»4 100%
I do not like this approach to learning.»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

28. WGs: Did your understanding of cultural differences with respect to learning situations improve?

4 svarande

yes»3 75%
no»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 1.25

29. WGs: What is your impression on how much the supervisor interfered with the WGs" work?

4 svarande

not enough»2 50%
right level»2 50%
too much»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

30. EXAM: The examination is based on the written examination report and an oral exam. What is your impression on this procedure?

4 svarande

I do not like it.»0 0%
I like it.»4 100%
I do not know.»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

31. What did you like most in the course?

- The labs at Onsala»

32. What did you dislike most in the course?

- The excursion to RUAG»

33. Do you have any ideas on how we could or should improve the course in general?

34. Would you recommend this course to somebody at your "home university"? Why, or why not?

4 svarande

yes»4 100%
no»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

Kursutvärderingssystem från