|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
BOM Modelling and problem solving in civil engineering 2011, BOM035Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2011-12-14 - 2012-01-21 Antal svar: 18 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?% Kontaktperson: Sara Kvartsberg» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Väg- och vattenbyggnad 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.11 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 - 50-75%» (75%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.55 - I don"t remember the goals.» (I have not seen/read the goals) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.12 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.91 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.37 - I think that the course project is a better way to assess if the goals is reached. The exam is almost meaningless, a better alternative is to have compulsory hand-ins for the different computer exercises to see that the goal is reached. » (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.27 - computer exercises have been great, especially the ones with Lars. » (Some extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.35 - Most of the literature was in Swedish. I am a foreign student so it was of no use!» (Small extent) 8. To what extent has the group project been of help for your learning?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.94 - Groups would be better if they mixed swedish and foreign students so that there is a larger field of experience. Help seemed to be given to the swedish students more than to foriegn students in the study sessions, this may have been a langauge problem.» (Some extent) 9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.05 - It was bad that you couldn"t download MATHCAD to your own computer. It also would have been good that it said in the beginning of the course that the excercises were compulsory.» (Rather badly) Study climate10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - Very good with regularly consultations in the course project » (Very good) 11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - Some people tend to always be late for group meetings (sometimes hours..). This results in not everyone being equally involved, yet everyone gets the same grade. I do not feel group work should be graded, just pass or fail. » (Rather well) 12. How was the course workload?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.94 - Good, but presentations on friday week 7 and exam in tuesday week 8 is fairly tight.» (Adequate) 13. How was the total workload this study period?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.16 - Better balance between the courses. Late presentations in week 7 in both courses made it hard to start studying for the exams. All focus has been on finishing group projects (writing reports takes a lot of time) and preparing presentations.» (Adequate) Summarizing questions14. What is your general impression of the course?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.83 - Projektdelen var riktigt bra men tyvärr är föreläsning/tentadelen det sämsta jag har haft under min tid på Chalmers.» (Poor) 15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Åsa Fransson! en av Väg och Vattens absolut bästa lärare.»- course project, computer exercises.» - Lars computer exercises. Group project. » - Computer exercises» - The group project.» - The course project was interesting. » - The course project. The computer exercises» - The projects. The water modelling was a very interesting task.» 16. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Hela föreläsningspaketet och tillhörande tenta. Jag förstod aldrig riktigt vad det var ni ville få fram. Det känns som att alla olika föreläsningar var helt frånkopplade från varandra och jag kan inte påstå att jag lärt mig knappt något alls om varför modelling är bra och hur man ska använda det för att lösa olika problem. Wet-föreläsningarna var tyvärr riktigt dåliga. Lars berättade aldrig vad det var vi skulle göra på en föreläsning eller varför det var bra eller på vilka problem man skulle kunna använda det på. Han bara visade en massa slides fulla med ekvationer i två timmar. Att han dessutom satt ner vid sin dator hela föreläsningarna gör ju inte saken bättre. Något som redan är väldigt teoretiskt och aningen svårbegripligt blir ju inte roligare av att läraren inte ens har entusiasmen att kunna stå upp och föreläsa. Köp en fjärrkontroll med laserpekare till Lars så att han kan stå upp men ändå peka på skärmen. Sen undrar jag även varför Cleas Ahlén måste hålla föreläsningarna om statistik. Som jag uppfattar det är det allmänt kännt att CA pratar ganska tyst och otydligt. Samtidigt har jag uppfattat från mina klasskamrater att han är mycket uppskattat som projekthandledare. Varför kan man då inte låta folk göra det som är bra på och ta in någon som är duktig på att föreläsa som kan ta statistikdelen. Det måste väl finnan någon som kan gå in och ta tre föreläsningar eller vad det nu handlar om. Jag anser även att tentan inte prövar om man har förstått kursinnehållet. Det var en typtenta rakt igenom och jag tror att jag har klarat den ganska bra men jag känner inte att jag kan så mycket om modelling. Slutligen anser jag att kursen inte borde det ligga i det obligatoriska blocket. Nu på master har de flesta fler kurser som de vill läsa än vad de hinner. Då känns det skit att lägga tid, kraft och studielån på denna kurs som ger så lite.»- Can"t think of anything. » - I would have liked to have scheduled opportunities to do calculations, such as those on the exam. When studying for the exam, it felt as if it did not reflect the course. More calculation examples throughout the course would have been nice. » - Remove the written exam, and add more focus on the course project and maybe also well structured (not only Mathcad) compulsory computer exercises.» - Integrated study groups. Literature only in swedish should be changed» - Be clearer about whether the computer exercises are compulsory or not. It was some confusion regarding this.» - Claes Ahlen has to speak more clearly in his lectures. Maybe it would be good to have some handouts or some points on a powerpoint so it would be easier to follow him. Sometimes he jst mumbles so you can"t hear what he"s saying and then you miss a lot of learning. » - Better structure on the lectures and the whole course. Hand out exercises similar to those on the exam during the course and advise students to work with them.» 17. Additional comments- Maybe it wasn"t a problem on the exam we got, but on some of the old exams it seemed like the people who had done the hydrogeology course project benefitted from it on the exam more than those who did the other projects. It might seem unfair, when you told us it should matter which project you get.. Also, the way you handed out the course projects might not have been the best. Why not just place people in different groups, so you get a good mixture of international and non-international students in the group? Seems more fair than to have everyone rush down to the blackboard, trying to get there first. »- The introductory lecture has to give a better picture of the course. Present the different areas in the course and the different teaching methods so that the students know what to expect.» - I"m in Erasmus, and I took this course because I people told me that there is lots of calculations and programations in this course. I found the calculation and programation part very small, superficial and easy. I remember lots of unexplicated complicated equation.»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22%