ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

High Voltage Engineering, MTT035

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-12-05 - 2012-01-22
Antal svar: 27
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 42%
Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

27 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 3%
Around 20 hours/week»9 33%
Around 25 hours/week»7 25%
Around 30 hours/week»9 33%
At least 35 hours/week»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3

- 1 hour = 60 mmin» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

27 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 3%
50%»2 7%
75%»5 18%
100%»19 70%

Genomsnitt: 4.55

- almost none of the tutorials offered did I attend, since it did not provide anything different from the solutions on the course web page.» (50%)
- Blennow is king!» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the learning outcomes?

27 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 3%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 14%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»22 81%

Genomsnitt: 3.74 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

26 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»25 96%
No, the goals are set too high»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.03

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

26 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 7%
Yes, definitely»19 73%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»5 19%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

- The level of the examination questions was fine, but the number of the theoretical questions was too large.» (To some extent)
- The exam was however a bit to time consuming. I found myself not able to write as much as I wanted, not because I didn"t have the knowledge, but because it would take too long and I would not have time for the last questions. This was a bit frustrating.» (Yes, definitely)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.74

Teaching and course administration

6. How well did you find the course structure?

26 svarande

very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 3%
Rather well»13 50%
Very well»12 46%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- We jumped a little back and forth between areas in the lectures, which could sometimes be a little confusing. Overall a well structured course, though.» (Rather well)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

26 svarande

Small extent»3 11%
Some extent»12 46%
Large extent»10 38%
Great extent»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.34

- The book is too complicated. » (Small extent)
- The book often proved to be too hard and too advanced to read. On the other hand, the laboratory booklets were very well-written and informative. » (Some extent)
- Not the book, but some hand outs were good!» (Some extent)
- The Kuffel is not informative and very monotonous. Hard to underestand what is important and what is minor details» (Some extent)

8. To what extent has the lectures been of help for your learning?

26 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 11%
Large extent»8 30%
Great extent»15 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

- The lecturer was enthusiastic and communicative. However, the lectures included too much writing on the board. Trying to take notes and at the same time follow the lecturer often proved very hard. There were also too many derivations of doubtful usefulness. Finally the lectures often included just "mentioning" stuff that is related to other fields, mainly power systems (eg switching overvoltages). The (quite significant) time used for this extensive superficial "mentioning" could be devoted to material more up to the point.» (Some extent)
- Extremely Great Extent!! Jorgen is Best of Best!!» (Great extent)
- Jörgen is a really good teacher» (Great extent)
- Best lecturer I had on Chalmers!» (Great extent)
- Great lectures. Pleasure to listen and easy to follow. Thanks to the lecturer.» (Great extent)

9. To what extent has the tutorials been of help for your learning?

26 svarande

Small extent»2 7%
Some extent»10 38%
Large extent»8 30%
Great extent»6 23%

Genomsnitt: 2.69

- It helps some, but they could be improved. It would be nice if the tutor spoke to the class sometimes and not only to the black board, then it could be little more of a conversation.» (Some extent)
- tutor wasn"t that good at explanations, so formulas were often speaking of themselves.» (Some extent)
- The tutorials clearly illustrated most of the theoretical concepts that were taught.» (Large extent)
- Very well organized and well prepared, covering all areas of the course thoroughly. A few times the tutorials could be delayed because too much time was allowed for questions.» (Great extent)
- Thomas was great!» (Great extent)

10. To what extent has the laboratory exercises been of help for your learning?

26 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 15%
Large extent»15 57%
Great extent»7 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

- Laboratory excercises are long, exhausting and not interesting» (Some extent)
- But it was too long the lab working times.» (Large extent)
- » (Large extent)
- The labs in this course is good. It is very good to do the report before the labs.» (Large extent)

11. To what extent has the trial exam been of help for your learning?

25 svarande

Small extent»4 16%
Some extent»10 40%
Large extent»7 28%
Great extent»4 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.44

- The trial exam took place quite early and therefore covered only a small part of the course material. » (Some extent)
- It is always good to get working in the begining of a course.» (Some extent)
- Not taken..» (Some extent)
- There was too little time for such a complex exam question, but the contents was good.» (Large extent)

12. To what extent has it been useful to use ebooks as a complement to the course text book?

26 svarande

Small extent»7 26%
Some extent»11 42%
Large extent»7 26%
Great extent»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

- I have used e-books once or twice.» (Small extent)
- the book was good not for all topics covered in the lectures. The lectures were mo explicit.» (Some extent)

13. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

26 svarande

very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»3 11%
Rather well»14 53%
Very well»9 34%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

- Much of the material taught during lectures was not available online. Some of the material that was available online was not closely related to what was actually taught in the class. » (Rather badly)
- It could sometimes be a while before the solutions to the tutorial problems were posted, and i missed having some of the overhead slides available.» (Rather well)
- The register for the second lab was put up late, otherwise it was good» (Rather well)

Study climate

14. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

26 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 19%
Very good»19 73%
I did not seek help»2 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

- The teachers were very helpful and knowledgeable.» (Very good)
- the Examiner tries to give very clear answers and also wants to help people which is so kind Jorgen is Best teacher ever in my time at chalmers!!» (Very good)
- It concerns the lecturer. I nave not ever tried to ask tutor for help "cause I knew it would be worthless.» (Very good)

15. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

26 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 3%
Rather well»8 30%
Very well»17 65%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

- The cooperation in the group for the first exercise was really bad. Some people have not been motivated to do anything, so that the main work for the report has been donde by only two of five persons. The groupconstellation for the second lab was different and it worked out very well. Everybody put effort in the report and shared his knowledge with the others.» (Rather well)

16. How was the course workload?

26 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»14 53%
High»11 42%
Too high»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

17. How was the total workload this study period?

26 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 7%
Adequate»5 19%
High»12 46%
Too high»7 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

- I took only part in one course this term.» (Low)

Summarizing questions

18. What is your general impression of the course?

24 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 4%
Adequate»3 12%
Good»12 50%
Excellent»8 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.12

- Very good. I like that the tutor mainly uses the black board for writing notes and not simply shows power point presentations.» (?)
- Great teachers! » (Excellent)
- The teachers were very enthusiastic and invested in making the course interesting and rewarding.» (Excellent)

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Jörgen Blennow has good teaching skills and passionate.»
- The labs, the teachers and the trial exam.»
- The staff»
- Blennow»
- -The lecturer"s great enthusiasm -The excellent laboratory booklets -The useful tutorial notes»
- "The high voltage biggest gits" Jörgen as teacher The trial exam The labs and preparation before»
- Study visit from possible future work places.»
- Do not change the lecturer!»
- The laboratory experiments and the trial exam»
- Everything»
- Notes organization»
- Same structure & same Course lectures »
- teaching personal»

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The trial exam and the exam should be more adapted too the time you have too complete them.»
- The laboratory hours should be reduced.»
- New book. »
- -The balance between slides and writing on the board -Less "just mentioning" (superficial knowledge) -Fewer derivations»
- The tutorials could be included a bit more discussion.»
- It could be better to change the tutor or ask him to improve his way of explaining the material.»
- Nothing»
- Nothing to mention..»
- laboratory home assignment questions might not be that tricky»

21. Additional comments

- As an exchange student I really appreciated that I have the impression that the aim of the professor is to make us understand high voltage engineering and that it is easy to get personal help if a student has problems. I am used to lectures as an monologue of the lecturer and if students do not understand everything they are told that they might be at the wrong place.»
- Thumbs Up Jorgan! U r a man at High Voltage!!»
- Every person related to this course clearly tried a lot to provide good quality of education. Indeed the course provided useful knowledge. However, I think that there is considerable space for improvement.»
- I thought that the exam wasn"t as balanced as it should have been. The theoretic part was too extensive or that the calculative problems could be bigger in some way. Any way I had a problem with the time on the exam were I felt that the theoretic part took to much time considering the points that they were worth.»
- Please pass on my thanks and regards to both Jörgen and Thomas for a great course! Best one so far!»
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.74
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.91

Kursutvärderingssystem från