|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Eval SUIT, EDA382Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2008-02-26 - 2008-03-05 Antal svar: 25 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 31% Kontaktperson: Per Zaring» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.4 - there was not a lot to do, most weeks it was around 8» (At most 15 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 - Had planned trips when many of the lectures were held.» (25%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.36 - There are none!» (I have not seen/read the goals) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.05 - accedentaly selected.. disregard of it please» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.36 - We haven´,t done the examination» (?) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.44 - nothing new in teaching for me» (Small extent) 7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.56 - Haven"t read course book yet.» (Small extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.44 - The web page could have been used a lot more to give information. The project manager meetings were rather meaningless. The web page could have used instaid to give the information and the questions could just as well have been sent by email since no answers were given in the meetings anyway.» (Very badly) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.96 - With so many things to do and just copy+paste workmorale was -2» (Very poor) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.32 - We had a very bad project manager. This lead to a dysfunctional team.» (Very poorly) 11. How was the course workload?25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.84 - Because there were no guidelines to what we were to achieve my group ended up doing nothing. The course administration"s only response to this was that it was normal not to accomplish anything. There should have been more follow-up on the progressions of the projects. » (Too low) 12. How was the total workload this study period?25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.72 - Would have been high had this course been what it promised.» (Low) Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.96 - Easily made top three worst courses. I wasted five of my CSN weeks learning nothing.» (Poor) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- the way we did the project and documents»- organize the cource more better» - Nothing.» - * A project.» - The idea to complete a project during the course is good, but, in my oppinion, there would have to be at least twice as much time. » - the part where open source can be used to implement the projects» - The project, it"s good to work during realistic circumstances. instead of just hypothesising about it.» - the project.» - the FSFU lecture.» - Pretty much nothing.» - Group Project» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- way of working and defining the projects and of cource the administration»- Spend more time making the groups. I ended up in a bad group which lead to the course being really bad, whereas I have heard of those who had were in a group that where good and enjoyed the course. Make everyone give a short motivation why they want a specific role, and build the teams based on the roles people want. Even though this takes time it is worth it because you can probably save some tutoring time in that people are in the appropriate roles. Follow-up!! Follow-up!! Follow-up!! Keep track of the progression of the different projects. We never got to should any results from our iterations. Why?!?» - * Make the exam related to the project. The example exam given to us does not relate very well to the project. Don"t put too detailed questions in there. * Maybe the course responsible should create the groups depending on what roles people want. In my group many people wanted the same role.» - There is not by far enough time to complete a plan driven project, so i think the course should either be longer (possibly combined with some other course) or there should not be any project at all. Plan driven developement is not appropriate when 95% of the time has to be spent on writing documents. I think the course could be a good course if there was at least twice as much time. I actually believe that Per said something like that to us too. The course book was very expencive and i think most of the students are not very interested in keeping the book as a reference in the future, so i think most students didn"t want to buy it.» - planning ahead! information should be clear from the start! this includes type of exam, presentation guidelines, server space and other administration stuff.» - the course goals should be more clear» - The creation of the groups. Should spend som more time on it to make sure that the sutdents gets the posistions they want. Think they will be more motivated.» - Lectures, it should be more concise and regular.» - Either add a grade system to justify and exam or remove the exam» - project part of the course. As it is now its too easy to finish, with help of oscommerce.» - Not so much documenting if the projects should be better. The projects need more guidance and followups. Setup servers directly so the work can start right away!» - Almost everything in my opinion. The lecture sessions should be more. So, students read more. The project work should be more focused and well-managed by course responsibles. I think it is achievable in at least two ways: more direct supervision of instructors. And second, Allotting defined points to it. I totally disagree with courses that are just PASS and FAIL. Such courses implicitly tell me do not worry, you gonna be passed anyway. So, no need to make endeavor. » - Course Book The project» - Make server ready before the work start and give specific guideline.» 16. Additional comments- Make the project simpler. Less choice, and clearer goal.»- * Maybe less focus should be put into creating the documents. It would increase the experience of working in a project like ours if the documents that we should work from was actually created before implementing the project as they should have been.» - There was great confusion among the students in the beginning. No one knew what was expected of us. It shoould have been stated clearly from the beginning that we it was up to us to decide all deadlines and deliverables in the project plan and that that the project plan was all we had to follow. There was no time to do any research before the SURAC and the project plan was due, so we couldn"t really do a good plan. There was hardly any time to develope the system - most of the time was used to write documents. There was no time to write the documents properly so we mostly just used the example documents and left out things not applicable. We didn"t understand much of what we were doing and we didn"t learn much. We could have made a much better system if we hadn"t spend most of the time writing documents and I think that the only real leasson we learned from the project is that plan driven developement is not suitable for time limited projects. We didn"t really get to experience the good things about plan driven developement, so the whole purpose of the project was unfullfilled.» - Unfortunatly The course was only wasting time in meetings.» - overall the course is good.» - Well, it"s hard to teach this in such a short course. I dont think it´,s the best course ever but I dont belive I can do a better job my self either.» - What is actually the goal? Documents were not useful and the time spend on the actual project was very short.» - The only reason that I can persuade myself with is that this is the first year of SET program and so its compulsory courses, because if I want to be a bit strict I have to say that this course was nothing but a title. »
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
72%