ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Methods for electronic system design and verification, Lp 2 Ht11, DAT110

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-12-08 - 2011-12-22
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 4%
Kontaktperson: Åsa Samdell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»1 20%
Around 25 hours/week»4 80%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- Workload was not too high, just about right.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 20%
50%»1 20%
75%»0 0%
100%»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Did not attend many lectures at all. They were not interesting» (25%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 40%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 20%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

3 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»3 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

Teaching and course administration

5. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 40%
Large extent»1 20%
Great extent»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The lectures have been irrelevant but the lab series has been rewarding. » (Some extent)
- The teaching is really extraordinary good, since Per knows how to teach and not only what to teach. » (Great extent)

6. How was the support you got for the term paper work?

- Okay»
- Requests for feedback were answered really quick, good and valuable hints were given.»
- Not enough»
- sufficient»
- The teacher offered us several opportunities to contact him in case we needed help/guidance. We took the that offer, specially the initial phase.»

7. Were the instructions for the term paper work sufficiently clear?

- They were not explained at all.»
- It could be clearer how detailed we should write it. Each field is wide enough to fill books, so we can either choose to give an overview or to dig into one selected part of the field. For me, it was not really clear how to handle that. »
- Yes»
- yes»
- yes, we had a lecture dedicated to the term paper. Also, we had the opportunity to ask question about the term paper after the lectures.»

8. Was the time for preparation of the presentation sufficient?

- Yes»
- Yes.»
- could be longer »
- yes»
- yes, we had clear deadline with enough time to prepare for each part.»

9. Was the time for preparation of the term paper report sufficient?

- Yes»
- Yes.»
- yes»
- yes»
- Yes, after finishing the presentation we had more than one week to prepare the term paper report.»

10. How useful were the lectures (lecture slides) for the term paper work?

- Very little»
- Probably depending on subject of term paper, I did not get a lot of information from lectures.»
- little »
- The guest lecture gave most for the term paper»
- the lectures were very useful as they gave us introduction to the topics. It was good to get the definitions and terminologies so that we would be able to look for and read the relevant research papers and books.»

11. Were the instructions for the labs sufficiently clear?

- They could be more clearer especially during the ALU vhdl code part»
- Yes.»
- yes»
- yes»
- yes, mostly. Although, the lab manuals had few occasions missed little but useful information that were mainly about Candence instructions or commands.»

12. How was the support during lab time?

- Alen is awesome!»
- Alen did a super job, was very helpful, kind and he knows everything. Also he really digs into things and explains and shows them in depth. Sven however seems neither willing to nor capable of helping with the topic.»
- good»
- sufficient»
- The TA was good»

13. How helpful was the log book and the feedback you got there?

- Can´,t really tell since the only thing the logbook is for is the lab report which I have not got any feedback on yet. »
- Was a very useful wrap-up after each lab, allowing one to metally go through the lab once more and put connect puzzle pieces. »
- dont know yet, depends on the result of lab reports»
- Helpful, good to have when final report was written»
- good. Most importantly the feedbacks were useful and relevant. »

14. How helpful were the tutorial sessions with Alen?

- Good»
- They were good, he pointed out the pitfalls that we experienced and gave us a good picture of the ALU in general.»
- great »
- Somewhat short maybe but the slides were good to have later»
- ok»

15. Do you think the grading with 60% labwork and 40% term paper is suitable?

- Yes»
- I would like a third part in the grading, for example an oral exam. I think the lectures themselves are underrepresented in the grading, while the make for quite a big part of the workload.»
- No, labwork should has more portion of final grade. 70% to 30%»
- Yes»
- ok»

16. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»2 40%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»2 40%
Great extent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- Especially the reading I did for the reports taught me a lot.» (Large extent)
- the presentation slides gave great deal of information. » (Great extent)

17. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»2 40%
Very well»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- Per is really fast with giving feedback. Schedules and pingpong messages work just fine.» (Very well)
- in addition to the Pingpong the static page was useful and easily accessible.» (Very well)

Study climate

18. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 40%
Very good»3 60%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- Did not seek help too much» (Rather good)
- Per even encouraged us to ask in lectures, which I like very much. Unfortunately it is always the same handfull of students that really interact during lectures. » (Very good)

19. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

5 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 20%
Very well»4 80%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

20. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 60%
High»2 40%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

21. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 60%
High»1 20%
Too high»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- Both courses were reasonably busy.» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

22. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»3 60%
Excellent»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

- Without doubt the best course I ever attended, thanks to the fact that Per spends a lot of thinking on how to teach and make students understand things.» (Excellent)

23. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The labs are quite good»
- Teaching style, term paper and lab report, guest lectures, tutorial sessions.»
- Alen»
- The term paper. I learned a lot by read many different research papers and books about my topic. The log book was useful as I got useful feedback.»

24. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The lectures are not that interesting and they are somewhat redundant»
- Lab support (Sven). »
- Per should try to speak slower!»
- The first pre-lab task was not so clear about the requirements. Also, the lab manuals had few occasions missed little but useful information that were mainly about Candence instructions or commands.»

25. Additional comments

Kursutvärderingssystem från