|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
TKITE 1112-2 Model Driven Software Development, TDA593Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2011-12-12 - 2012-01-12 Antal svar: 34 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 49% Kontaktperson: Mattias Bingerud» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Informationsteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.26 - 30 hours were spent on the project and lectures only, I didn"t have time to read the course material or to study for the "volontary exams".» (Around 30 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.44 - Stopped going since the lectures were too messy.» (50%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.94 - The formal course objectives in the Studentportal differ from the course objectives specified on the course homepage... Removed the notion of Design Patterns and added the notion of xtUML? That"s no fun. » (The goals are difficult to understand) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.06 - I was kinds of confused when I read the problem description at the begining of each problem» (No, the goals are set too high) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.4 - Too many factors play a role for your grade, the amount of time spent on a course is not represented if you miss the voluntary exams.» (No, not at all) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.32 - The lectures were not very helpful because they seemed to be unorganized, and covered only some specific topic, didn"t provide general understanding. Help during supervisions was small, mostly relating to book / bridgepoint help.» (Small extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.2 - As I mentioned earlier, there was very little time to read or do anything else than work on the project.» (Small extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.88 - This years home-page was impossible to find from studentportalen, got linked to 2010 years version even though this problem was brought up countless times during lectures» (Very badly) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.29 - Good the first five weeks, abysmal after that. Our supervisor went for vacations during study week 6 and 7? Did not get the response/feedback we would have liked from the bridgepoint-master. Maybe the lecturers should try using the tool so you can guide us better? Putting all eggs in one basket is not desirable. What would you do if the Bridgepoint-master was sick during study week 7?» (Very poor) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.14 - The groups were too large.» (Very poorly) 11. How was the course workload?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.08 - Very balanced in the beginning but went completely of the charts by the end, the project consumed more than 30 hours on its own the last 6 days.» (High) 12. How was the total workload this study period?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.97 - The other course I took was well balanced but this course got a bit extreme by the end.» (High) Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.14 - Fix this course!» (Poor) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Group-work and lectures»- UML.» - the teachers!» - The teachers were very enthusiastic about the course, and I really got the feeling that they were determined to make the course as good as possible. » - Voluntary exams.» - Bridgepoint, was good that we were "forced" to learn bridgepoint by ourselves.» - guest lecture» - The good connection between lecture subjects and project hand-ins. Supervision time.» - The pair lecturing The voluntary exams» - Two teachers every lecture is nice» - the pair teaching and group supervision» - The division of the first, more theoretical part of the course and the second, more practical part. » - The project» - The teaching spirit.» - The project» - Weekly hand-ins, the group project (even if it might need to be a bit smaller)» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Grading-system! The current grading-system does not even remotely give a good picture of how your understanding of the course. Too much workload! Extreme workload! Don"t keep pair-teaching!!! (as it was this year)»- Bridgepoint. » - bridgepoint project should either become the focus of the course (i.e. implementation phase) or be removed altogether. groups should be small from the beginning (4 as opposed to 8 persons per group)» - Smaller groups. Make the course optional. Have only one lecturer on the course. » - No teacher duos. Håkans incessant questioning of what Rogardt said got really tedious. Stop bickering.» - Bridgepoint (might be the best option available though)» - Clearer course goals, should maybe have smaller groups from the beginning? » - Have an introductory lecture on Bridgepoint, just a live-show of the basics of the program. More tutorials wouldn"t hurt.» - To short time on the voluntary exams, or a bit too extensive content on them. It became to stressful so I gave up doing them. Also I felt upset to rate my friends. Didn"t feel right when we all worked equally. But Rogardt and Håkan changed that part a bit to the better :D» - More time and/or easier assessments.» - if it is possible, please dont let us give ranks to group member» - Better support for course software installation on personal computers.» - I wouldn"t wish the Bridgepoint part of this course on my worst enemy. It seriously needs to be droped or heavily reinovated.» - To have a mandatory course in which the students must learn a tool, such as Bridgepoint (used by 3 companies in the world?!), which is working poorly, does not have any documentation and is extremely buggy is insane.» - Bridgepoint should be included over the whole course period, and design question assistance should be availible.» - More concrete information on how to use bridgepoint.» - The fact that you can only get a 4 by doing the voluntary exams, its the project that consumes so much time and proves that you"ve learned something from the course material but it can only give you a grade of 3 which I find inadequate. Keep the voluntary exams for getting a 5 and when the 4 is on the fence (much like for a 3 now). And this course would be perfect.» - 1. BridgePoint - Stop using it! It is just plain bad! 2. The lecturer - No offence, but someone who can speak understandable English would be preferable. 3. The voluntary examinations - They don"t reflect what a student knows about modeling in a good way, especially not what a student knows it the end of the course which should be what counts. 4. Lectures - They need to be better planned (and executed), it felt like they was very much improvised. Use PowerPoint or PDFs and not only the blackboard. » 16. Additional comments- I learnt much and I understand why it"s good to learn but the way that it was taught this year is not acceptable.»- Första delen av grupparbetet tyckte jag var bra och relevant. Projekt i grupp för att förstå modeller, diagram etc funkade bra för mig. Andra delen av kursen när vi skulle implementera vårt system i bridgepoint var inte bra. För det första känns det konstigt att vi i en obligatorisk kurs ska lära oss ett program som används på tre företag i hela världen. Jag kan tycka att det kan vara bra att ha sett och använt ett sådant program då, som jag har förstått det, det faktiskt används en del liknande ute i arbetslivet. Då kanske det är så att Bridgepont är bästa alternativet, men i så fall tycker jag att det är viktigt att poängtera för studenterna varför man ska använda just Bridgepoint, och varför det är viktigt med sådana programvaror. Det andra som var dåligt med Bridgepoint-delen är att vi bara blev ombedda att "implementera vårt system". Det var dålig introduktion på hur man använder Bridgepoint överhuvudtaget och det var svårt att förstå hur det fungerade och vad man egentligen skulle göra. Det var dessutom omöjligt att hitta information om det på egen hand då det inte är ett vida använt program. Det var lite svårt att knyta ihop implementationsdelen med de första fyra veckorna. Förutom att man fått domain knowledge och ett klassdiagram kändes det lite som att man började på en helt ny grej. Voluntary exams som vi har haft fyra stycken är ett bra sätt att få studenterna att hänga med i kursen. Dock kan jag tycka att det är dåligt på så sätt att om man skulle hamna efter kan man inte ta ikapp. Det ska vara det man lärt sig vid kursens slut som är det viktiga. Dessutom var de utförda på ett konstigt sätt med tanke på att de är betygsgrundande. Att sitta i en hörsal bland massor av studenter gör det väldigt lätt att fuska. Och dessutom fick vi skriva namn och personnummer på våra exams. Vi har anonyma tentor på chalmers av en anledning. Jag vet inte riktigt hur man skulle kunna lösa det på ett bättre sätt. Ett alternativ skulle kanske kunna vara en dugga någon gång efter kursens fjärde vecka? Något som var bra var att föreläsare/handledare var engagerade i studenterna och i gruppernas projekt. » - Great lectures. Lecturers actually seem alive and thinking. Some of my peers complain about you not being structured, I think it seems more like you are very confident in the subject?» - you made us design the model first and then implement it. that"s hardly incremental development. exercises would be welcome to prepare for voluntary exams. no, the project work doesn"t count as exercise because it is not individual work and it makes you believe you know more than you do. voluntary exams should be obligatory, how about 2 mini-exams (dugga) instead?» - A big applause to Rogardt and Håkan for a fun course and for their fun and caring personalities.» - Very good course, but the workload was a little bit too high and the assessments could be seriously improved.» - I enjoyed the dual-lecturer style, it was interesting, especially when they had different ideas about how you should do things.» - Something that annoyed me quite a lot during the course was the teachers attitude of "if you don"t like some part of the course, you come up with an idea how to do it better". It is the course responsible"s responsibility to plan and execute the course not the students. Some parts of this course was horribly bad and yes, constructive criticism could be asked from us students, but it is not our job to "design" and plan the course! And seriously, STOP USING BRIDGEPOINT! »
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2%