ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Design of technological innovations and markets (DTIM) SA

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-11-24 - 2011-12-01
Antal svar: 4
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 44%
Kontaktperson: Anneli Hildenborg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

4 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»1 25%
Around 25 hours/week»2 50%
Around 30 hours/week»1 25%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

4 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»4 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

4 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»3 75%
No, the goals are set too high»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- only too high because i don"t have a background in for example - finance. the learning is not effective - we need more actual finance classes, like a week or two of finance for the people who haven"t studied it before, it"s important to learn this stuff, and to master excel!!» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

4 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 100%
Yes, definitely»0 0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- No questions within the financial area seems strange when we have had quite many lectures in the subject.» (To some extent)
- To most extent it did, but there could deffinitly have been a question on finance on the exam.» (To some extent)
- Some major parts of the course were not reflected in the examination(finances for example).» (To some extent)
- I was quite disappointed in the exam, not because it was hard, but because it was boring. I thought we would need to piece together what we had learned, strategize, discuss the cases, instead we did a Ck method - again - talked about s-curves without applying them to anything like the Honda case for example. it would have been a lot more fun to answer questions about the cases using things like s-curves. The exam did not reflect what you told us to study, and it basically seemed to test whether or not we attended lectures, not how much we knew or how capable we are.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»1 25%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»3 75%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- confusing, hard to follow mats when he is lecturing, i don"t get his points, his line of thought. I liked the case work thought, i learnt a lot from the cases, and the TEVA and the speakers we had in.» (Small extent)
- The introduction to finance with Greg was more confusing than helpfull. » (Large extent)
- Some small parts tended to be repetitive.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»2 50%
Great extent»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- The book was easy to read!» (Large extent)
- the schilling book is really good and the cases are useful» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

4 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 75%
Very well»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- Could have been posted earlier prior to class. Sometimes i did not have time to read through it before class due to late announcment of reading material/information what to read.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

4 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 25%
Very good»3 75%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- Gregory was very helpful with finance. He is very nice, hopefully we can have more finance in the future. » (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

4 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 25%
Very well»3 75%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- depends, the group work is very difficult, but in general between all students we seem to be doing a good job sharing information» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 25%
High»3 75%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- Not a lot of time to study for exam due to overall large workload.» (Adequate)
- ALOT of group work, with the same people over and over again. too much i think. i want to get to know others and see how they work. it"s too much!!!» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
High»4 100%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- too much group work, but otherwise i like having a lot to do.» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

4 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 25%
Good»2 50%
Excellent»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Took a while to grasp the actual content of the course. The first lectures were very wide and did not tie togeather.» (Adequate)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- I liked the TEVA and the CK, but the business model gives a lot to our projects.»
- Practial assigmnets on finance. That wass very good for the understanding. Discussion on cases.»
- The coursebook - it was really good.»
- more finance, business model exercise was fun with anders, cases, schilling book, some group work, but for the sake of sanity mix it up a bit. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The finance lectures.»
- More structure on finance lectures!»
- The emphasis on CK method, including an exam question about it was a bit too much.»
- change up the group work teams»

16. Additional comments

- I"ve definately learnt a lot, but not always effectively»

Lectures

Appreciate on a scale 1 (low appreciation) - 5 (high appreciation) the combined competency and pedagogy of the following lecturers:

17. Mats Lundqvist

4 svarande

1:»0 0%
2:»0 0%
3:»1 25%
4:»2 50%
5:»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4

- He doesn"t seem to be so in-tune to what students are thinking, what we understand/don"t understand or care about. » (3:)
- Easy to listen to. Sometimes a bit unprecise.» (4:)

18. David Andersson

4 svarande

1:»0 0%
2:»0 0%
3:»1 25%
4:»3 75%
5:»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- inspiering but only had him one lecture. Didn"t make a big impact.» (4:)

19. Anders Sundelin

4 svarande

1:»0 0%
2:»0 0%
3:»1 25%
4:»2 50%
5:»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Easy to follow when explaining.» (4:)
- dry lectures but great business model database and business model exercise. a fun day with him.» (4:)

20. Gregory Carson

4 svarande

1:»0 0%
2:»2 50%
3:»0 0%
4:»1 25%
5:»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- Enthusiastic, but very hard to understand his reasoning. Too unstructured to have a introductions course.Teaching on a too high level. Unstructed PP-slides. » (2:)
- super knowledgeable and willing to help out, but he talked way too much about internships and non-relevant content in lectures - people want to learn!!!» (4:)

21. Per Hultén

4 svarande

1:»0 0%
2:»0 0%
3:»1 25%
4:»2 50%
5:»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Only had one lecture...» (4:)
- very concerned about how much we learnt, seemed like a nice guy, good advice » (4:)

22. Jonas Mårtensson

4 svarande

1:»0 0%
2:»0 0%
3:»0 0%
4:»4 100%
5:»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Not enough time to really evaluate, but he seems to be a good lecturer.» (4:)
- knowledgable and professional» (4:)

23. Clémence Carreel

4 svarande

1:»0 0%
2:»0 0%
3:»3 75%
4:»0 0%
5:»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Interessting topic, but maybe a "unenthusiastic". Seems to be very competent on her subject.» (3:)
- She is very nice, maybe too nice, so she doesn"t say when wrong is wrong.» (3:)
- hard to understnad how she"s thinking» (3:)

Kursutvärderingssystem från