Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
ICT Economics and Policy SP 2 2011/2012 TEK320, TEK320
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2011-11-24 - 2012-01-30 Antal svar: 16 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 40% Kontaktperson: Erik Bohlin» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.16 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 5 | | 31% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 6 | | 37% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 3 | | 18% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 2 | | 12% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.12 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 16 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 1 | | 6% |
75%» | | 7 | | 43% |
100%» | | 8 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4.43 - I missed some lectures that collided with other lectures but I intended to attend every lecture.» (75%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?15 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 5 | | 33% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 1 | | 6% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 4 | | 26% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 5 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 2.6 - You never really introduced the concept of i ICT» (The goals are difficult to understand)
4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.11 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 11 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?14 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 5 | | 35% |
Yes, definitely» | | 7 | | 50% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 2 | | 14% |
Genomsnitt: 2.78
Examination: Project and take home exam6. How long time did you spend on the take home exam?*16 svarande
Less than 10 hours» | | 0 | | 0% |
10-20 hours» | | 0 | | 0% |
20-30 hours» | | 5 | | 31% |
30-40 hours» | | 7 | | 43% |
More than 40 hours» | | 4 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3.93 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 7. How long time did you spend on the project*16 svarande
Less than 10 hours» | | 0 | | 0% |
10-20 hours» | | 1 | | 6% |
20-30 hours» | | 4 | | 25% |
30-40 hours» | | 6 | | 37% |
More than 40 hours» | | 5 | | 31% |
Genomsnitt: 3.93 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 8. What grade would you give the take-home exam as a means to learning*16 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Bad» | | 1 | | 6% |
Average» | | 3 | | 18% |
Good» | | 9 | | 56% |
Very good» | | 3 | | 18% |
Genomsnitt: 3.87 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 9. What grade would you give the project as a means to learning?*16 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Average» | | 3 | | 18% |
Good» | | 8 | | 50% |
Very good» | | 5 | | 31% |
Genomsnitt: 4.12 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - because it has a very narrow focus» (Average)
- It was very broad. We did not know what was included in ICT and what was not» (Good)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.96
Teaching and course administration10. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?16 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 12% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 18% |
Large extent» | | 9 | | 56% |
Great extent» | | 2 | | 12% |
Genomsnitt: 2.68 11. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?16 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 6% |
Some extent» | | 6 | | 37% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 31% |
Great extent» | | 4 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 2.75 - Some readings are not used at all» (Some extent)
12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?16 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 2 | | 12% |
Rather well» | | 5 | | 31% |
Very well» | | 9 | | 56% |
Genomsnitt: 3.43 - The web page bugged quite often. Saying that you were logged out when you wasn"t, which forced you to reload the page a couple of time before it worked.» (Rather well)
Study climate13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?16 svarande
Very poor» | | 1 | | 6% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 4 | | 25% |
Very good» | | 10 | | 62% |
I did not seek help» | | 1 | | 6% |
Genomsnitt: 3.62 14. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?16 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 1 | | 6% |
Rather well» | | 5 | | 31% |
Very well» | | 10 | | 62% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.56 15. How was the course workload?16 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 2 | | 12% |
Adequate» | | 9 | | 56% |
High» | | 5 | | 31% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.18 - Depending on what your goals where. In the beginning it was low but in the end it got pretty high, but that could also depend abit on the other course.» (Adequate)
- Mainly focused around the take home exam» (High)
16. How was the total workload this study period?16 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 6% |
Adequate» | | 4 | | 25% |
High» | | 7 | | 43% |
Too high» | | 4 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3.87
Summarizing questions17. What is your general impression of the course?16 svarande
Poor» | | 1 | | 6% |
Fair» | | 2 | | 12% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 6% |
Good» | | 9 | | 56% |
Excellent» | | 3 | | 18% |
Genomsnitt: 3.68 - Very interesting. Good to understand the ICT policy issues» (Good)
18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- the take-home exam»
- Take home exam.»
- Project and take-home exam»
- Bonus points for attending lectures»
- The group work»
- the litterature and scope»
19. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The lectures, it was near impossible to stay focused during the lectures.»
- the list you sign up on if you attended class. If people wanted to it was easy for them to cheat, especialy when it was guest lecturer there.»
- -»
- Well overall I am very much satisfied with everything so I guess nothing needs to be changed but rather add more current economic issues in the course contents»
- some questions in the take hom exam were very confusing. Although I put a lot of effort and time in them I only recieved half of the maximum points. Therefore I must have severly missinterpreted them.»
20. Additional comments- -»
- I wish the rule of bonus points for attending the class would be introduce in all other courses»
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.96 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.74* obligatoriska frågor
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|