Visa resultat

Advanced Production System HT 2011, PPU115

Your own effort

1. Approximately how many hours per week did you work with the course?

9 svarande

At most 10 hours»		3		33%
About 15 hours»		3		33%
About 20 hours»		3		33%
About 25 hours»		0		0%
About 30 hours»		0		0%
At least 35 hours»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Only studied for the quizzes» (At most 10 hours)

2. How much of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%»		0		0%
25%»		0		0%
50%»		0		0%
75%»		1		10%
100%»		9		90%

Genomsnitt: 4.9

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

I have not seen/read the goals»		1		10%
The goals are difficult to understand»		0		0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		5		50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»		4		40%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

4. Are the course goals reasonable considering the number of credits?

Yes, I think so»		4		40%
Hesitant»		5		50%
No»		1		10%

Genomsnitt: 1.7

- Unfortunately the course was not as "Advanced" that I had hoped for» (Hesitant)
- They are reasonable but the course in itself should aim higher I think bunching a couple of previous courses together does not represent a course in advanced production system.» (Hesitant)
- Too less work effort is needed!! The course is a joke and need some considerable re-work in order to place itself among the other master courses at Chalmers!» (No)

5. Did the examination (assignments + written exam) assess whether you have reached the goals?

No, not at all»		0		0%
To some extent»		9		90%
Yes, definitely»		1		10%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

- the course did not in my opinion live up to the name advanced production systems.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		1		10%
Some extent»		5		50%
Large extent»		3		30%
Great extent»		1		10%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- The lectures did not learn me anything new, neither did the labs!» (Small extent)
- Most of the lectures given where repetition of previous courses, i would have liked to go deeper into the different subjects since i"ve already acquired the basics. robust design lecture was good!» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other course material been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		2		20%
Some extent»		5		50%
Large extent»		3		30%
Great extent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

- some articles where relevant, not all, reevaluate» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Poor»		0		0%
Fair»		3		33%
Acceptable»		3		33%
Good»		2		22%
Excellent»		1		11%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

- An examiner should not inform a class that this course in mandatory, it is only recommended by the program, but if there are courses that collide it is the students responsibility to prioritize. there was some mishaps with articles but this was taken into consideration by the administration when quizzes was corrected which was good. There where also a lot of scheduled time which affected other courses (also recommended) and when 50% of the class takes the same courses one might think the administration might be a bit more accommodating.» (Fair)

Laborations

9. What did you think about Laboration 1 (ErgoSim)

- Quite fun to see the animated persons move around, lift boxes and try to get into impossible positions. But did I learn anything from it? No...»
- I think it was ok, but it would have been better if I have known more about human factors before the lab. »
- It was really funny laboration. Hans taught us really well. The goal of these laboration definitely perfect.»
- it is good, but the scheduled time is short, so we just get a very shallow knowledge about how to use the software.»
- Quite difficult but you did learn a new software that could be at hand later on.»
- ok, neutral»

10. What did you think about Laboration 2 (DES)

- Nothing new here either. Biggest task was to learn about Excel»
- I think it was ok, but the information was not so clear. The data that should was cleaned was hard to read, and there where no additional information. »
- I took a lot of time to finish. But we experienced real time problem with input data management.»
- Good. Learned news things like data management before input it into a model.»
- Best lab, learn some of it.»
- Very difficult and hard to understand what was supposed to be done. did not really learn anything, was just refreshing up on the excel skills»
- interesting, new point of view. could have given more»

11. What did you think about Laboration 3 (Path planner)

- Nice to see that there is a software, even though not completely perfect, that fixes things that otherwise takes so much longer time to do. Learnt that IPS Pathplanner needs some more programming before it is of any use»
- This was a good lab, even if the program was messing with us. »
- Select automatic path from different alternatives and it was fun. »
- Good review of we have learned from Robot course.»
- easier than the other two. learn more about the software.»
- ok. no really. not really unnecessary since we already had a big lab in the robotics course.»

Project

12. What did you think of the mini-project?

Study Climate

13. How was the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Poor»		0		0%
Fair»		3		30%
Adequate»		5		50%
Good»		2		20%
Excellent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- Did not ask for help» (Fair)

14. How has the cooperation been, between you and the other students?

Very bad»		0		0%
Rather bad»		0		0%
Rather good»		5		50%
Very good»		5		50%
I have not tried to cooperate»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

15. How was the total workload during the entire study period

Too low»		3		30%
Low»		6		60%
High»		1		10%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

- Spent in total about 20 hours on the course» (Too low)
- medium, not what i expected from an advanced course» (Low)

16. How do you evaluate the workload of labs for this course?

Too low»		2		20%
Low»		2		20%
Adequate»		6		60%
High»		0		0%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- Too much hassle with the IPS software and Excel, otherwise it was OK.» (Adequate)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.5

Course Team

17. Johan Stahre

10 svarande

Excellent»		0		0%
Very Good»		2		20%
Good»		5		50%
Poor»		2		20%
Very Poor»		1		10%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- Have barely met him so I cannot say anything about his performance» (Good)
- Didnt see very much of him...» (Poor)
- He didn"t really show that he cared about the course» (Poor)
- hardly any contact, he came with misinformation about the course being mandatory» (Very Poor)

18. Sandra Mattsson

10 svarande

Excellent»		0		0%
Very Good»		3		30%
Good»		7		70%
Poor»		0		0%
Very Poor»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.7

- She is pretty organised and it all went down quite well. It was though negative that she did not fix acess to the PPU-lab for the students, since we had all three labs in there! Really poor that Björn Johansson had to take care of that!» (Very Good)
- First I think she was a little bit nonchalante, but in the middle of the course it was better and she was helpful when problems occured.» (Good)

19. Dan Lämkull

10 svarande

Excellent»		1		10%
Very Good»		2		20%
Good»		6		60%
Poor»		1		10%
Very Poor»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.7

- It was ok, but most of it I had already heard» (Good)
- Misstake after misstake made me less and less intrested in what he had to say about whatever his subject was about...» (Poor)

20. Hans Sjöberg

10 svarande

Excellent»		0		0%
Very Good»		2		20%
Good»		7		70%
Poor»		1		10%
Very Poor»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- When we needed help on the lab we got it and could continue. Nothing to complain or celebrate about.» (Good)

21. Anna Davidsson

10 svarande

Excellent»		0		0%
Very Good»		3		30%
Good»		7		70%
Poor»		0		0%
Very Poor»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.7

- Have heard her lecture from the course Industrial Engeering, so this was nothing new. Still interesting, but I did not learn anything new from it» (Very Good)
- It was ok, but most of it I had already heard» (Good)

22. Björn Johansson

10 svarande

Excellent»		1		10%
Very Good»		7		70%
Good»		2		20%
Poor»		0		0%
Very Poor»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

- Very quick, rather slovenly lecture about DES. Basically a repetition from the course Simulation of prod. systems. Did not learn anything new here either. Björn is helpful though!» (Good)

23. Jutta Hildenbrand

9 svarande

Excellent»		0		0%
Very Good»		1		11%
Good»		5		55%
Poor»		2		22%
Very Poor»		1		11%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Felt that she was quite demeaning for some reason. I listen to what she had to say, but it was not a very inspiring lecture at all.» (Poor)

24. Rikard Sjöberg

10 svarande

Excellent»		4		40%
Very Good»		3		30%
Good»		3		30%
Poor»		0		0%
Very Poor»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

- Rikard was very lively and enthusiastic! He sucessfully got the students committeed and participating in his lecture. Best lecture in the course!» (Excellent)
- This was the best lecture, he is a really good speaker and this was the only lecture that was giving me new knowledge» (Excellent)

25. Per Nyqvist

10 svarande

Excellent»		0		0%
Very Good»		3		30%
Good»		7		70%
Poor»		0		0%
Very Poor»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.7

- Did not have much contact with him. Nothing to complain or comment about either» (Good)

26. Jon Andersson

8 svarande

Excellent»		0		0%
Very Good»		0		0%
Good»		6		75%
Poor»		1		12%
Very Poor»		1		12%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- -» (?)
- Why was he a supervisor? Did he know what project was about? I cannot believe how little of a help he was during our project work. Not that he did not WANT to help, it was rather that we did not need his poor knowledge about the subject.» (Very Poor)

27. Erik Lindskog

6 svarande

Excellent»		0		0%
Very Good»		0		0%
Good»		6		100%
Poor»		0		0%
Very Poor»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- -» (?)
- Have not meet him, so I cannot comment.» (Good)

Summarizing questions

28. What is your general impression of the course?

Worst course ever»		2		20%
Fair»		5		50%
Adequate»		2		20%
Good»		1		10%
Excellent»		0		0%
Best course ever»		0		0%
No answer»		0

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- Unfortunatly, this is the course where I have learnt so little for 7.5 HEC that it is embarrasing! I think you should totally re-build this course to next year (that is, if it still exists...)» (Worst course ever)
- I"m sorry to say that I was really disapointed of the course. I have been choosing courses to make it possible to read this course, and it was not meeting my excpectations at all. I thought it should be more than just repetion of other courses. The could have been a bit bigger. Compared with other courses this was easy 7.5 credits and in the master you choose courses that intrest you and an "easy course" don"t make me happy. It is a very intresting subject but the cours could have been a lot better. Keep the labs, with maybe some adjustments. Also keep the project but I really think more lectures would have been to prefer. » (Fair)

29. Additional comments