|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Sustainable Electric Power Systems, ENM125Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2011-12-05 - 2012-01-22 Antal svar: 27 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 50% Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.27 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.62 - Former education involved a lot of electrical engineering.» (At most 15 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?27 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.18 - Attended most of the tutorials, just a few lectures» (50%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the learning outcomes?27 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.81 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - On every lesson there was clearly stated what our goals are» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.04 - The course is to simple.» (No, the goals are set too low) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.32 - to much questions on the exam and it was unclear what answer you were looking for. Some times you wanted to writ a full page for 0,5 points . » (?) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?27 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.03 - The Slides where messy with too much text. Often the you didn"t have time to read before the lecturer started talking with other words then those on the slides making it very confusing. » (Small extent) 7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?27 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.48 - The book was too large. A material containing less humor and simplifications and more engineering would be more condensed and appropriate.» (Small extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?27 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.92 - Slow on updates for slides. They where not published before lecture so no preparations could be done.» (Rather badly) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?27 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.25 - When you e-mailed both Lina and the teaching assistance you didn"t get an answer!» (Rather poor) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?27 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.59 - Not so much cooperation. During the Powerworld project I found myself in a group which for different reasons could not work together so most of the project became individual work. One person dropped from the course and one basically just didnt work at all. So our project was mostly done by two persons, and even we two hardly had time to work together outside of the scheduled time because of the fact that we took different courses. This was probably due to bad luck on my end however.» (Rather poorly) 11. How was the course workload?26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.26 - Like I said, the projects workload was enormous. Nothing else.» (Low) 12. How was the total workload this study period?25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.76 - But I took three courses so that"s my own fault. » (Too high) Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?27 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.25 - this was the first time this corse was done but it has alot of holes to fill. The lectures need to improve alot. Often the tutorial personell had to explain the basics again after the lecturer. They also didn"t know what the lecturer had gone trough . It almost felt like the lecturers came unprepared and made up the lecture on the spot. Poor quality.» (Poor) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The tutorials, more of them. The project is good, but please give us some more info about the criteria for the project. I think we made about 15 different systems, that we all thought worked, but when showing them to the teacher all of the sudden something new had to be fullfilled. Please make this more clear for next yar.»- Tutorials» - The study visit, that was really nice but maybe have a small briefing before to show what we can expect and also tips on what to look for specifically. The powerworld computer project should definitely be kept, and maybe add a small warmup project already the first week?» - The tutorials and the computer project» - The tutorials was ok, considering they had to hold unprepared lectures in the start of every one because no one had understand anything from the lectures. computer lab was ok, but clearer instructions and have the same version on chalmers as the one you can download» - Lab. Tutorials were mostly good. Computer lab was good.» - The lab as it was now but with the correct lab PM. The computer lab was interesting but it was hard to get it going. » - The exercises part it was very interesting, the theory part less. I have had some difficulties to study with the literature material. Slides were too much conceptual without clear explanations.» - I really liked the course book! I know some people complained about it being "too fuzzy" and "loads of talking and talking but little information", but I think this book is perfect for the aim of the course. It is about conceptual understanding instead of the typical American way (presenting three millions equations and how to derive them). I believe MPSES-students (i.e. mechanical and chemical background) in general miss the conceptual understanding. Equations can be learned later if someone gets interested.» - computer lab» - o Study visit to the substation o The tutorials! They were very helpful. o The computer lab as it is good for understanding the theoretical aspects of network design» - Tutorials» - The different areas of knowledge were all really interesting, however since we only "scratched" the surface of each area the course became more of a bachelors course than a masters course » - Project, labs, » - calculation exercises» - the project» - Exercises - it was a total disaster » 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Linas lectures are good, but it is to much of a summary of what she"s already said. Make the course involve more, and she can make her lectures more unique. »- Lina Bertling» - - not so many professors, - approach to the big assignment, - teaching method.» - Some of the lectures were useless, and some were good. There was an old man, i dont remember his name, but i didnt learn anything in 4 hours there. I think the course was not for us, we didnt have any background for this. I also think that the "sustainable part" were very good, i find this part very intresting. But i think the course were a bit messy. I learned from the project that cost of lines and shunts are important, nothing about the elctrical though. » - Give Chris more lecture time, starting first week. Change the focus of the course towards concepts that should be new to most non-electro students like 3 phase system, power flow, network grid and operation. Cut back on basic concepts that we should already know, like basic circuitry: Ohms law, KVL, KCL, complex characteristics (resistance -> impedance etc), basic transformers (N1/N2 factor). ADVANCED COURSE!!!!» - Restructure the course and make it clearer what the examiner wants us to learn. Since the exam mainly was about sustainability and it felt like the focus of the course was on the technical aspects, the exam should probably be shifted somewhat towards the technical aspects.» - Not so much informatione per powerpoint slide!! Cant follow the lectures with som much information, dont have time to read them during class. Mote strucktured lectures that take into account that we havent taken any electrical corses before!!» - Guest lecture from vattenfall didn"t know English nearly good enough to hold a lecture. Lina need to star teaching more hard facts. She spend way to much time talking about whats important and not without actually getting to the real info. » - Inconsistency of the lectures.» - Shorter lectures. 4 hours is brutal and with such poor quality it often felt as a waste of time. » - The computer lab needs some work. First of all, make sure it"s the latest version of PowerWorld on the computers because files from the new version we downloaded at home did not work on school computers which lead too a lot of extra work. The tutorial exercises needs to be completely reworked to match the course. The answers needs to match the questions.» - Theory part.» - I think the lectures must be more structured. I guess the problem was that Lina were uncertain about our knowledge level. Sometimes she rushed through things that were really complicated, and then she spent 15 minutes explained something that 90% of the class already knew. This made the the lectures messy and a bit frustrating. My advice is to make more structured Power Point-slides (just a few sentences per slide) and try save the most basic questions until after the lecture.» - o New teacher for the lectures about transformers! o The first lesson in the computer lab should be used to give the students an introduction about electric network design aspects» - more clear goals, better lectures, more reasonable labs» - More dialog between the teachers is needed in order to coordinate towards the desired learning outcome» - the structure of the course, more structured lectures with clearer goals» - If there is 4 hours of class in a row, it would be better to have 2 hours of lecture and 2 hours of tutorials. This seemed to work better towards the end. » - better communication between teachers. It MUST be clarified what is the focus areas, what"s important to understand etc, both to help teachers and to the students. Many of the lectures were of no use.» - the introduction part of the first two lectures was too long, at a too low level.» - Better structure and explanation what the course is really about. What is focus?? Don"t thing that you need so detailed information on electrical system so you can"t understand "power grid and society". for me it felt a little bit redundant (my background is not electrical).» - Exercises - it was a total disaster » 16. Additional comments- the concept ware really interesting, just try to organize in a better way the work, maybe put on the web page some pre requisites, so that you can save time and go in deep detail into the transmission system!»- I think the subject is intresting, but i think the course is a little confusig. I didnt know what to study before the very end, I know it was the first course, and i hope the course will be better for next year caus this is a very important subject, » - Introduce the computer project a bit later on in the course, since we didn"t have the slightest clue of what we were doing in the beginning. We didn"t have enough knowledge in the field of electric power flow. It would also be a good idea to include a small project where we get to write our on code in Matlab that solves e.g a three bus decoupled power flow.» - Get a better plan on what the course shall include and follow it. » - I think there are a lot of other bad things I"ve forgotten. » - The subject is interesting and important, so shape up this course!» - I think it was to much question on the exam with low points. Hard to know how much you have to write. The computerlab had varied teaching quality. It is hard to solve a problem when you don"t understand what you are doing and when the teacher either can see what the problem is and therefor can"t solve it. Had a few lessons when we had problems that couldn"t be solved, which is a bit annoying.» - Exercises - it was a total disaster Course - all in all it was great » Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.6
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14%