Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Power Engineering Design Project, EEK150

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-12-05 - 2012-01-22
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 48%
Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»0 0%
Around 25 hours/week»5 35%
Around 30 hours/week»6 42%
At least 35 hours/week»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- Total hours spent was more than 35 hours per week» (At least 35 hours/week)
- The project was really time consuming and the load distribution was not as we expected. This course affected the time needed for studying the other course. I strongly recommend to let this course has 15 credits weights.» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

14 svarande

0%»1 7%
25%»1 7%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 14%
100%»10 71%

Genomsnitt: 4.35

- This course doesn"t have lectures it"s just a project» (0%)
- Not really worth it. The kind of report writing we "learned" wasn"t used in the project.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the learning outcomes?

14 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 21%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»8 57%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.78 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I have heard them a little... the reason for the course is to improve report writing.» (I have not seen/read the goals)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 61%
No, the goals are set too high»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 2.38

- The project we did needed much more time and wasn"t prepared.» (No, the goals are set too high)
- This course must have been for 15 credits and spread to 2 study period or offered as a single course for one study period» (No, the goals are set too high)
- This course deserve 15 Cr» (No, the goals are set too high)
- I"m not sure if it is a goal but some of the projects were way too large for this course. Look through the projects one more time before you decide if you are going to have it or not. » (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

12 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 8%
Yes, definitely»4 33%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»7 58%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- No exams» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)
- no exam» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)
- it was a project work. no exam» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.78

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 38%
Large extent»6 46%
Great extent»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.76

- Reading from the literature was a good help during the project» (?)
- We have always got help when asking about stuff.» (Large extent)
- I think this has to do with who you have as a supervisor. Some are more picky than other...» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»3 25%
Some extent»5 41%
Large extent»4 33%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.08

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

12 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»3 25%
Rather well»8 66%
Very well»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 28%
Very good»10 71%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

14 svarande

Very poorly»1 7%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 28%
Very well»9 64%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- The best part of the course was to work in a group and it helped to develop team work and work more efficiently.» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 21%
High»7 50%
Too high»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

- From time to time it was very high... sometimesyou had towait for answers from other people.» (Adequate)
- It consumed more time for this course and there was no sufficient time for the other course.» (Too high)
- I know that at least two groups agrees. » (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 21%
High»7 50%
Too high»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor»1 7%
Fair»1 7%
Adequate»4 28%
Good»4 28%
Excellent»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

- It was very fundoing some real work, but there should have been more information on the report writing. Have a meeting in the first few weeks to show how the report should be handled instead of 2 days before hand in.» (Adequate)
- Though it helped us learn a lot,it could have been managed and structured well as the prerequisite of each project was not mentioned clearly and it was clear only after the work for the project started.Moreover the things needed for the project to be done were not ready and it took more than the expected time to work on the project.» (Adequate)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The kind of projects. Something real work to do.»
- The idea of this course is good but it could be made more simple and structured.»
- The support from supervisors»
- the topics, the workshop»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The meetings regarding report writing should be more often. To avoid the risk of rewriting the whole report in 2 days.»
- It"s better to change this course with the one that the students could present an international paper through that.I think in this stage we need to submit an international paper instead of improving our knowledge through the design project!»
- Increase the credits or reduce the scope of each project or atleast keep the preliminary things ready before allotting the project to each group and split all the teams in an even manner as there are quite a lot of students in few groups and very less in other groups..»
- Increase the time and the credit for this course!»
- Is this a course where you are going to learn how to write reports, then you have to think about how to do it in the best way. The supervisors judgement should be equal and I"m sure that it wasn"t that this year.»
- smaller groups »
- the project scope is very vast for just 7.5 credits»

16. Additional comments

- Prepare the opportunity for the student and motivate them to submit an international paper.»

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.78
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.59

Kursutvärderingssystem från