Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Course Evaluation Metals Engineering, MMK232

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-11-09 - 2011-12-01
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 38%
Kontaktperson: Lars Nyborg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 28%
Around 20 hours/week»5 35%
Around 25 hours/week»4 28%
Around 30 hours/week»1 7%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

- Around 15» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

14 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 28%
100%»10 71%

Genomsnitt: 4.71

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

14 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 7%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»13 92%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

- reading directions also helped alot since the volume of litterature in the course was large.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»12 92%
No, the goals are set too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 15%
Yes, definitely»11 84%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.84

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 14%
Large extent»8 57%
Great extent»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- The heat treatment lab was very good. It could have been more hours scheduled!» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»2 14%
Some extent»7 50%
Large extent»2 14%
Great extent»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- With a book course should be better» (Some extent)
- Mostly, the handouts was useful» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 21%
Very well»11 78%

Genomsnitt: 3.78

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 21%
Very good»11 78%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.78

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

14 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»6 42%
Very well»8 57%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

11. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»11 78%
High»1 7%
Too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

12. How was the total workload this study period?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»11 78%
High»2 14%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

- I only had this course» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 21%
Good»8 57%
Excellent»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 4

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The practical class about heat treatment of hypereutectoid steel waw very learningful.»
- guest lectures»
- The study climate, and course structure»
- The heat treatment lab!»
- Group task,such as lab work.»
- Maybe we can process a little bit slower?»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- hand out the heattreatment lab much earlier. it would be better to get in around week 2 so it doesnt come as such a surprise since its quite big.»
- Maybe some more pratice in software such as jmathpro.»
- Maybe practicals should be scored and add a bonus to the final exam..»
- 4 hours of lectures are quite heavy»
- Better language/grammar on the lecture slides and handouts»
- Would like have some more session on Labs like Thermocalc,Jmatpro and modelling»

16. Additional comments

17. Please provide your comments regarding the practical class on heat treatment of hypereutectoid steel

- good practice of general steel thermes and workmethods.»
- as mentioned before a good practical class learned alot from it.»
- Some more explanation should be given about basic stuff(for some students) before this practical because of the different background of students.For a lot of them things addresed here where actually new and a little difficult to understand..»
- Practical experience would be included»
- Learned a lot»
- It was very good, it created a good learning environment. An idea could be to divide the working sessions into the "chapeters" and have a small summary in between to correct the answers and provide a better platform for questions. Now, the last session had too many questions and too much correction giving time to correct everything»
- that"s the important thing that was done in a group and it made us to understand the topic much clear.»
- Sounds useful, but it"s still a paper practise, not reality.»

18. Please provide your comments regarding the practical class on ThermoCalc and JMatPro

- interesting but when we never are able to use it practically more than in the class it doesent stick that good.»
- would have wanted some more of this in the course.»
- It was good»
- Some practical example (using pc) during the lectures»
- Good session to get to know the methods»
- It was just like an introductory session and it will be much better if we do some small exercise. »
- I hope I can use them oneday»

19. Please provide your comments regarding the practical class on process modelling (Deform)

- interesting demonstration and good to point out modell theory and limits.»
- This lab was not so good in helping me in my understandig of the subject.»
- This could be included as a lecture instead of a seperate practical because it"s mostly theoretic»
- More dettails about modelling anf FEM»
- as 18.»
- It was just like an introductory session and it will be much better if we do some small exercise.»

20. Please provide your comments regarding the optical microscopy laboration

- good first introduction to microscopy»
- The lab was good in the sense of getting a general knowledge of how a material sample i being examined. »
- It was good»
- Boring and way too easy. You could just skip it instead.»
- ok, but I would have liked to use the equipment more rather than writing an report.»
- This is was good,that we can able to assess the material once we saw the picture of micro structure ,since we did it manually and came to know about possible ways that it can go wrong.»
- Mostly used from then on»

Kursutvärderingssystem från