ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Audio Technology and Acoutics 2011, VTA135

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-11-18 - 2011-12-02
Antal svar: 16
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 64%
Kontaktperson: Astrid Pieringer»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. What priority did you give this course?

16 svarande

Very high»7 43%
High»8 50%
Average»1 6%
Low»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.62

- not as high as SVM but higher than IPC» (High)

2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

16 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 12%
Around 20 hours/week»4 25%
Around 25 hours/week»4 25%
Around 30 hours/week»5 31%
At least 35 hours/week»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.93

- The reports after the labs took some time the last half part of the course» (Around 20 hours/week)
- Two labs took a little too much time to complete.» (Around 30 hours/week)
- Not as much at the start but alot more at the end due to the labs and theory surronding them. » (Around 30 hours/week)

3. How large part of the lectures offered did you attend?

16 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»6 37%
100%»10 62%

Genomsnitt: 4.62

- And that is just because I have an overlapp with my other course.» (75%)
- Had some clashes with the other course» (75%)
- Missed one lecture. » (100%)

4. How large part of the exercise classes offered did you attend?

16 svarande

0%»2 12%
25%»3 18%
50%»2 12%
75%»4 25%
100%»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 3.43

- Had two courses which collided with each other in Lp1 and therefore prioritized the lectures. » (25%)
- Didn"t feel that they gave that much, probably because I didn"t prepare for the excercise before by calculating on my own. Though, notes from them were helpfull during study for the exam» (50%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus (see https://www.student.chalmers.se/sp/course?course_id=16739) states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

5. To what extent do you feel you have acquired the knowledge, skills and attitudes stated in the learning outcomes?

16 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 12%
Large extent»12 75%
Great extent»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3

6. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

16 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»15 93%
No, the goals are set too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.06

- Close to being to high goals.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

7. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

16 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»8 50%
Yes, definitely»8 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- There was too much to calculate during the exam and there was not ehough time to think. In my opinion, going through the questions should be done in a shorter time to leave room for checking. » (To some extent)

Astrid Pieringer"s lectures

8. How to you judge Astrid"s ability to communicate on the right level, with clarity, and enthusiasm?

16 svarande

Very good»12 75%
Good»3 18%
Average»1 6%
Bad»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 1.31

- Compared to the other lectures, Astrid"s were the best on this particular course.» (Very good)
- Surely the best of the teacher we had.» (Very good)
- Needs to work a bit more on her English.» (Average)

9. How was the presentation speed in Astrid"s lectures?

16 svarande

much too slow»0 0%
a bit too slow»3 18%
adequate»10 62%
a bit too fast»3 18%
much too fast»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3

10. How was Astrid"s ability/will to answer questions?

16 svarande

Very good»13 81%
Good»2 12%
Average»1 6%
Bad»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 1.25

- She was always very helpful, also after class.» (Very good)

11. How do you judge Astrid"s knowledge within the subject?

16 svarande

Very good»13 81%
Good»3 18%
Average»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 1.18

Per Sjösten"s lectures

12. How to you judge Per"s ability to communicate on the right level, with clarity, and enthusiasm?

16 svarande

Very good»7 43%
Good»4 25%
Average»2 12%
Bad»3 18%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.06

- During the lectures we went too deep, making it very difficult for many people to follow.» (Average)
- Really hard to follow, no clear path. » (Bad)

13. How was the presentation speed in Per"s lectures?

16 svarande

much too slow»0 0%
a bit too slow»1 6%
adequate»4 25%
a bit too fast»10 62%
much too fast»1 6%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.68

- A bit to much information which was outside the subject and therefore he had to speed up the lectures. » (a bit too fast)

14. How was Per"s ability/will to answer questions?

16 svarande

Very good»9 56%
Good»3 18%
Average»4 25%
Bad»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 1.68

15. How do you judge Per"s knowledge within the subject?

16 svarande

Very good»14 87%
Good»2 12%
Average»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 1.12

- But there was no structure in the lectures. I was a bit overburded by the electric circuits.» (Very good)

Wolfgang Kropp"s lectures

16. How to you judge Wolfgang"s ability to communicate on the right level, with clarity, and enthusiasm?

16 svarande

Very good»14 87%
Good»2 12%
Average»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 1.12

- Needs to practice his English a bit more. » (Good)

17. How was the presentation speed in Wolfgang"s lectures?

16 svarande

much too slow»0 0%
a bit too slow»1 6%
adequate»13 81%
a bit too fast»2 12%
much too fast»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.06

18. How was Wolfgang"s ability/will to answer questions?

16 svarande

Very good»15 93%
Good»1 6%
Average»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 1.06

19. How do you judge Wolfgang"s knowledge within the subject?

16 svarande

Very good»15 93%
Good»1 6%
Average»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 1.06

Pontus Thorsson"s lecture

20. How to you judge Pontus"s ability to communicate on the right level, with clarity, and enthusiasm?

16 svarande

Very good»10 66%
Good»1 6%
Average»4 26%
Bad»0 0%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 1.6

- Quite poor English, needs some work. » (Average)

21. How was the presentation speed in Pontus"s lecture?

16 svarande

much too slow»0 0%
a bit too slow»0 0%
adequate»9 60%
a bit too fast»5 33%
much too fast»1 6%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.46

- During the lecture there was no time to think about and realize what all the shown graphs actually meant.» (a bit too fast)

22. How was Pontus"s ability/will to answer questions?

16 svarande

Very good»11 73%
Good»2 13%
Average»2 13%
Bad»0 0%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 1.4

- don"t know, not sure if he got any questions» (Average)

23. How do you judge Pontus"s knowledge within the subject?

16 svarande

Very good»11 78%
Good»3 21%
Average»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 1.21

General on the lectures

24. Do you think you could have managed the course without going to the lectures?

16 svarande

Yes»1 6%
No»15 93%

Genomsnitt: 1.93

25. Number of lectures?

16 svarande

Too many»0 0%
Good»15 93%
Too few»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.06

- Would have liked to know more, but I guess that"s covered in other courses.» (Too few)

Alice Hoffmann"s exercise classes

26. How do you judge Alice"s ability to explain and to motivate solutions?

16 svarande

Very good»0 0%
Good»6 40%
Average»7 46%
Bad»2 13%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.73

- If the purpose of the exercises was to prepare us to the exam and teach us how to calculate problems, showing just a matlab code doesn"t really serve the purpose. Maybe Alice could refer to the given formula collection instead of just mentioning them and explain how to use them before starting to solve the problem. Also it doesn"t take a lot of time to actually write down the exercise number on the blackboard.» (Average)
- Sometime it was quite messy ...» (Average)
- In the beginning it was horrible, nothing could be followed during the excersise. This could have been due to the sync with the lectures and that alice did not explain at all what she did. It got a lot better later.» (Average)

27. How was the presentation speed in the exercise classes?

16 svarande

much too slow»0 0%
a bit too slow»3 18%
adequate»7 43%
a bit too fast»5 31%
much too fast»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- But needs more explanation about how the theory and the math refers to each other. » (adequate)
- Much to fast the first few lectures and without explaination» (a bit too fast)

28. How was Alice"s ability/will to answer questions?

16 svarande

Very good»2 13%
Good»4 26%
Average»9 60%
Bad»0 0%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.46

- Too many answers were "it just is"» (Average)
- She could not always anser the questions right away, but always looked up the answers for the next lecture.» (Average)

29. Do you think you could have managed the course without going to the exercises?

16 svarande

Yes»7 43%
No»9 56%

Genomsnitt: 1.56

- The notes was very good to have during studying on my own» (No)

30. Number of exercises?

16 svarande

Too many»1 6%
Good»12 75%
Too few»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.12

- Good, but i thought it was better for me to study at home since we had a solutions manual.» (Good)

Ragnar Vidarsson"s labs

31. How well was the lab work prepared by the supervisor?

15 svarande

Very good»3 20%
Good»5 33%
Average»6 40%
Bad»1 6%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.33

32. How was the supervision?

16 svarande

Very good»3 18%
Good»7 43%
Average»5 31%
Bad»1 6%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.25

33. How was the labs" relevance to the course?

16 svarande

Very high»4 25%
High»5 31%
Good»6 37%
Bad»1 6%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- Very little use of the many hours spent on the two labs in the exam. » (Bad)

34. How much knowledge did you gain from the labs?

16 svarande

Very much»5 31%
Much»6 37%
Moderately much»4 25%
Little»1 6%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.06

Course material and administration

35. How do you judge the course book?

15 svarande

Very good»1 6%
Good»0 0%
Average»9 60%
Bad»5 33%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- I"ve got this huge english version ... Too much weight for too few content.» (Average)
- Didn"t find that much use for it. Exercises should be fixed so that it would be possible to solve them by hand. Learning the calculation methods are at least to me more important on a fundamentals course than spending my time trying to make matlab accept my code.» (Bad)
- Used Beranek to more extent and other material such as wikipedia. Some things the book didn"t mention at all and some were too mathematically oriented without an explanation for applications.» (Bad)

36. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

16 svarande

Very good»8 50%
Good»7 43%
Average»1 6%
Bad»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 1.56

Summarizing questions

37. What is your general impression of the course?

16 svarande

Excellent»1 6%
Good»12 75%
Adequate»3 18%
Fair»0 0%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.12

- I really enjoyed this course.» (Good)
- Can be improved with a better book and better lab equipment.» (Good)

38. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the changing lecturers»
- Wolfgang and Astrid´,s lectures. »
- Astrid"s and Pontus" lectures.»
- Having different teachers for certain topics.»
- Maybe give the lectures in th eorder as the book.»
- Astrids lectures lab-work report»
- The core and basic concepts/subjects»

39. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- the course book and that the grading of the exam makes the whole grade of the course»
- The lab work needs more connection to the course and the exam in the are to be preserved as big as they wore this year. »
- Better exercise sessions. If there would be good material on the course, it is possible to pass the course without attending a single lecture, but without exercise sessions it becomes extremely difficult. »
- Awareness of the teachers what subjects we"ve had and what not. Lab grading should be done like in the SVM course, and perhaps partly influence the final grade.»
- The course book»
- The book, and more on impedance and connection between electrical, mechanical and acoustical. Would have liked to get more knowledge on the concept of calculation on impedances. »

40. Additional comments

- it was hard to put a lot of effort into this course while also having sound and vibration measurements and individual preparation course at the same time»
- Thanks for an interesting curse but please, the ventilation in the lecture room needs to be improved! »

Kursutvärderingssystem från