Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Electrodynamics, FUF085
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2011-11-04 - 2012-01-07 Antal svar: 6 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?% Kontaktperson: Gabriele Ferretti»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.6 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 6 | | 100% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 6 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 1 | | 16% |
75%» | | 0 | | 0% |
100%» | | 5 | | 83% |
Genomsnitt: 4.66 - missed 2 lectures» (100%)
Goals and goal fulfilment3. How understandable are the course goals?6 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 1 | | 16% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 1 | | 16% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 4 | | 66% |
Genomsnitt: 3.33 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.5 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 5 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?5 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 20% |
Yes, definitely» | | 3 | | 60% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 1 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 3 - My sense is that the grade was depended on knowledge of Maths rather than Electrodynamics.» (To some extent)
- With the hand in problems and what we have been told about the exam I think it will.» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?6 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 33% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 50% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 2.83 - Its always good to talk to the lecturer about difficulties on the subject.» (Large extent)
- Lectures where excellent, but i missed many due to other course colliding.» (Large extent)
7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?6 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 16% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 50% |
Great extent» | | 2 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3.16 - The litterature is very thorough.» (Large extent)
8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?6 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 33% |
Very well» | | 4 | | 66% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 - Felt like more to do when there was a new problem every lecture. Maybe better to get three problems simultaneous every week?» (Rather well)
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?6 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very good» | | 5 | | 83% |
I did not seek help» | | 1 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 4.16 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?6 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very well» | | 3 | | 50% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 3 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4.5 - I know none of the other students :(» (I did not seek cooperation)
11. How was the course workload?6 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 33% |
High» | | 4 | | 66% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 - Given the subject I think it would have to be.» (High)
- The problems were hard, but on the other hand do-able and you learned much.» (High)
12. How was the total workload this study period?6 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 16% |
Adequate» | | 3 | | 50% |
High» | | 2 | | 33% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.16
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?6 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 16% |
Good» | | 3 | | 50% |
Excellent» | | 2 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 4.16 - The name of this course could be "Mathematical Methods for Electrodynamics" rather than "Electrodynamics". The exercises and the examination involved Maths to greater extend than Electrodynamics.» (Adequate)
14. What should be preserved to next year?- Three lectures a week is good. Hand in problems, absolutely. »
- Nice with one exercise per lecture and that there is feedback one week after handin.»
- Overall pretty good.»
- Everything.»
15. What should be changed to next year?- I can"t think of anything.»
- Sometimes it felt like you didn"t learn enough theory with only a bunch of problems to do.»
- Written rather than (or in addition to) oral exam could be considered.»
16. Additional comments- I really enjoyed this course.»
- The course is very rewarding, very hard and very time-consuming.»
- Perhaps, the teacher could take into account the background of the students while examining them.»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|