Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Evaluation 2011: Intellectual property strategies CIP057 CSE, GIBBS ICM (Chalmers), CIP057

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-11-03 - 2011-11-10
Antal svar: 18
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 40%
Kontaktperson: Anna Tullsten»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

18 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»3 16%
Around 25 hours/week»6 33%
Around 30 hours/week»2 11%
At least 35 hours/week»7 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

- Extemely hard to estimate.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

18 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 22%
100%»14 77%

Genomsnitt: 4.77

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

18 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»5 27%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 5%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»8 44%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.61

- I did read the goals now for the first time. I think the course was very good but could have emphasized the strategy part even more.» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- I have probably seen them but forgot about them.» (I have not seen/read the goals)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

16 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»16 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

18 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»7 38%
Yes, definitely»11 61%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.61

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 11%
Large extent»10 55%
Great extent»6 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- The exercise have been very useful» (Large extent)
- Really good! But you always need to study on your own aswell.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»2 11%
Some extent»3 16%
Large extent»9 50%
Great extent»4 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

- Boken kändes inte relevant i förhållande till kursen. Alldeles för mycket bakgrundsinfo etc. Otroligt tråkig att läsa. Ett kompendium skulle räcka gott, ngt man kan gå tillbaka till när man behöver veta ngt snabbt. Levin kommer man aldrig läsa igen. » (Small extent)
- Levin was a very good book!» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

18 svarande

Very badly»2 11%
Rather badly»3 16%
Rather well»11 61%
Very well»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- Needs to be a better preparation from the administrative side if they demand high results and a big workload from us. » (Rather badly)
- Föreläsningsanteckningar måste komma upp i tid. » (Rather badly)
- A little bit hard when we had to do hand-in before we had a lecture on the subject.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

18 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 5%
Rather good»9 50%
Very good»8 44%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

- Too bad that we did not get any feedback on our written hand-in that we had every week. Could have been helpful when studying for the exam» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

18 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 11%
Very well»16 88%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

11. How was the course workload?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»10 55%
High»8 44%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.44

- Konstigt med lugnt i 3 veckor och sedan kötta. Borde kunna fördela det bättre. » (Adequate)
- Rather good, not to much.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»7 38%
High»9 50%
Too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

18 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 5%
Good»14 77%
Excellent»3 16%

Genomsnitt: 4.11

- Very good background to have.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Lars as a lecturer. More of him! Ulf as a lecturer. More of him! »
- Levin book»
- The excercises hand-ins»
- - Guest lecturers - Ulf"s inspirational lectures/quotes»
- The weekly assignments. The invtite you to begin study early as well as discuss with other students, which is necessary in this kind of courses.»
- The hand-ins where very good. I think it was good that they where not graded because we have a lot of other things to do and it feels like you learn a lot anyway.»
- Lars»
- I think that Lars lectures on branding & trademark should be kept as well as ulfs. The lectures with jannice and nils ericssons lecuters would benefit from being even ore interactive.»
- lars" lectures, hand ins»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The set up of the assignment workshops.»
- Not such have assignments the same time as the exam»
- administartiv work»
- Not completely cancel lectures and just book them in later, especially the introduction lectures, but instead give some replacement lecture in relation to theme of the excercises.»
- - Distribution of information to be clearer and consistent»
- The whole process around the quizzes were just ridiculous. They were good in the sense that you got the evaluate your knowledge but a better way (and less expensive?) would have been to just give us the questions and answers on PingPong, letting us do them on our computers. Or hand them out in the end of an ordinary lecture. Now you had to go to e special "appointment", write your name and everything. »
- more practice exam with example answers to.»
- More feedback on the assignments. Had one lecture where we first discussed answers twice in the class and then hardly had time to get the lecturers answers. Since we already communicate quite well across the class this could be more focused»
- quiz and better communication between teachers»
- Any changes to the schedule need to be communicated further in advance if possible. »

16. Additional comments

- More lectures would be nice.»
- Overall very good structure of the course. It begun quite narrow with the Patent Act, but when we learnt more, more were incorporated in the lectures and assignments. Very good. Another thing is that it would have been very good to get "the correct answers" on the hand-ins on paper, not just the discussions in class.»
- Really good course! It is fun to have such a big focus on strategy as we have.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från