Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Manufacturing Processes, MPR034

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-10-31 - 2011-11-31
Antal svar: 33
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 36%
Kontaktperson: Gustav Holmqvist»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

33 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»9 27%
Around 20 hours/week»14 42%
Around 25 hours/week»6 18%
Around 30 hours/week»3 9%
At least 35 hours/week»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.18

- No time because too many labs in this course...unessecary...also the PLM course was too demanding...as well as this course...insanely» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

33 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»5 15%
75%»15 45%
100%»13 39%

Genomsnitt: 4.24

- Not so rewarding lectures» (50%)
- The teacher was really good, but due to lack of time I sometimes skipped the lectures and read the handouts in 30 min-1h, thus saving time.» (75%)

3. Did you find that your own background knowledge was appropriate for the course*

33 svarande

The course started on a too advanced level»0 0%
The course started on a slightly too advanced level»0 0%
OK»30 90%
The course started on a too low level»3 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

- The course took on on a approriate level for the knowledge gained in the basic course» (OK)
- very good to have the repetition of the previous course(s) at the beginning of the course» (OK)
- But the exam was a bit too hard...» (OK)
- If you"re from the bachelor of mechanics from chalmers with including "Tillverkningsteknik" then this course was a bit to much repetition on certain topics.» (The course started on a too low level)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

4. How understandable are the course goals?

33 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 12%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 3%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 18%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»22 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.39 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- So flummigt» (The goals are difficult to understand)

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

29 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»28 96%
No, the goals are set too high»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.03 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Way too high...» (No, the goals are set too high)

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

30 svarande

No, not at all»1 3%
To some extent»9 30%
Yes, definitely»18 60%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.7 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- unrelevant questions at exam» (No, not at all)
- I personally think that the examination placed too much emphasis on the parts of the reading instructions that were to be considered of medium importance. Quite frustrating as I felt that I knew the course content better than I had the chance to prove at the examination. » (To some extent)
- But I AM SO ANGRY at how some of the questions where asked. You could have been more describing of what you wanted me to write about. and especially what the first picture described. I asked several times over the first picture when I did not understand how it was constructed or what it described (from any angle, and which pictures belonged together), the only answer I got from you Gustav was that it had to do with time, I still did not understand the picture but you could not say more you said. I misunderstood the entire assignment! I have subsequently discussed with another student who asked you several times (read nagged until he / she got an answer he / she understood)and then realized the task! No, oh what this makes me angry! Gustav, you could have just said it was like scenes from a movie, it would have been to explain the issue without revealing the answer!» (To some extent)
- Not all things were in the examination but four hours isn"t enough to do that.» (To some extent)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.73

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

Regarding mainly the lectures by Gustav Holmqvist.

33 svarande

Small extent»1 3%
Some extent»8 24%
Large extent»16 48%
Great extent»8 24%

Genomsnitt: 2.93 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- good ppt» (Some extent)
- Gustav should maybe not "talk himself down" and say things "this is not so very interesting...". It is much better if the lecturer shows that he/she likes the subject. » (Some extent)
- They were okey. A good opportunity to ask questions and get dne basic knowledge.» (Some extent)
- Additional skitches, explanations etc. helped a lot to understand the sometimes complicated topics.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

33 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»14 42%
Very well»19 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.57 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I prefer using pingpong though.» (Rather well)
- Fast updates and caring e-mails.» (Very well)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.25

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

31 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»7 22%
Very good»19 61%
I did not seek help»5 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.93 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I wrote an email and got an answer almost immediately » (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

33 svarande

Very poorly»1 3%
Rather poorly»1 3%
Rather well»6 18%
Very well»24 72%
I did not seek cooperation»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.69

- This may not be true for all students, but I had to search for people to write lab reports with due to coming from minor master program and entering the class after a free year. It has not been a major problem, but a proposal is to make it mandatory to write the lab report with the ones you made the lab with. » (Rather well)
- worked out fine during the labs» (Rather well)
- I have a mix of old and new friends, which made ​,​,it a good group.» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

33 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»6 18%
Adequate»20 60%
High»6 18%
Too high»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

- I think I did well but didn"t study much. Too small step from the mandatory bachelor course in Manuf on M.» (Low)
- The labs were very well balanced in the aspect of workload, but it was much to learn before the exam about details and such. I know we were supposed to have "general understanding" but in order to explain something in general you need to know the details.» (Adequate)
- Why so many lectureS!?!?! It´,s a masters course...the work load shouldnt be that high!!! WE ARE at the same time doing PLM and seeking master thesises!! STRESSING!!!» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

33 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 3%
Adequate»17 51%
High»13 39%
Too high»2 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.48

- Had another course at the same time that required a lot of time» (High)
- Why so many lectureS!?!?! It´,s a masters course...the work load shouldnt be that high!!! WE ARE at the same time doing PLM and seeking master thesises!! STRESSING!!! CANT UNDERSTAND THIS !!!» (Too high)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.93

Specific parts of the course

13. Laboratory work: To what extent was the labs been of help in yor learning?

(just the lab parts, not the assignments).

33 svarande

To a small extent»0 0%
To some extent»7 21%
To quite large extent»21 63%
To great extent»5 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.93 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Good to see them in reality since I have not had much experience of these manufacturing methods before. » (To some extent)
- NOT the turning lab! Again, if you read the "Tillverkningsteknik M" it is a little too much repetition.» (To some extent)
- lubrication lab wasn"t that good metal forming lab was very good» (To quite large extent)
- Very intersting to see things "live"» (To quite large extent)
- The second one was the worst lab in Chalmers history...late teacher...no structure...no nothing...late closing on the lab as well» (To quite large extent)
- Awesome! Learning by doing is really good!» (To great extent)

14. Group assignements: To what extent where the assignements (following the labs) meaningful for your learning?

Give comment if you want to be specific.

33 svarande

Not meaningful»2 6%
Somewhat meaningful»7 21%
Quite meaningful»17 51%
Very meaningful»7 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

- Didnt learn anything...unessecary..had nothing to do with lectures...» (Not meaningful)
- We have done similair tasks in other courses. Though that one in punching deepend the understanding in that subject. » (Somewhat meaningful)
- To discuss with others helps learning.» (Quite meaningful)
- For exam preparation, not much time for topics covered by assignments needed, good way to remember» (Quite meaningful)

15. "Separate" lecturers - To what extent where these lectures of help in your learning?

There were som separate lectures given by Daniel Wiklund on forming, N. Stenbacka on joining and J Berglund on Surfaces. Give comment if you want to be specific.

33 svarande

Small extent»6 18%
Some extent»18 54%
Large extent»7 21%
Great extent»2 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.15

- I did not participate at those lectures. I was on a half lecture held by a man from SWEREA. His slides were interesting to read, but his retoric skills were not as good, he could not engage me in his lecture. » (Small extent)
- I do not remember Daniel"s lecture, so it was may be fine. However, I remember that I did not get anything out of the lesson that Nils had, so many slides and so much non-technical facts. It was just frustrerand. The third lecture, I remember as slow and uninspiring, unfortunately. But I might confuse it with the first one.» (Small extent)
- Joining lecture was interesting and contained useful information. Surface lecture was very boring, had no sustainable learning effect.» (Some extent)
- The lecturer from trollhättan talked to general and talked about methods that wasn"t included in the course.» (Some extent)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.93

Summarizing questions

16. What is your general impression of the course?

33 svarande

Poor»1 3%
Fair»3 9%
Adequate»5 15%
Good»16 48%
Excellent»8 24%

Genomsnitt: 3.81 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Won´,t recommend to anyone!» (Poor)
- It"s great learning goals and objectives. But I may not have felt so so challenged, because I knew some of the content already.» (Fair)
- Very interesting course, and presented in a good way.» (Good)
- As a product developer this was a great course and at the right level. Interesting to learn about the different manufacturing processes. I would not want to change the information content of this course. » (Excellent)

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- References to real industry (e.g. mentioning what companies that are using the processes that are being discussed in the lecture) is always interesting, maybe more of a lecturing philosophy/type, still worth mentioning. The lab on deep drawing was also very hands-on and good.»
- Labs and videos of manuf methods.»
- The content and lectures of this course. »
- Lab sessions should be preserved. Thats were I learnt quickly»
- Labs and assignments. Good powerpoint slides.»
- labs»
- less lectures and labs!!! »
- Labs»
- The content of lectures»
- it is good now»
- Everything except the guest lectures, it was incredible borring and non inspiring.»

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Change to do the lab reports with the group you made the lab with.»
- Nothing»
- »
- exam should place more emphasis on the parts that were stated to be important. »
- The guest lectures!»
- Surface topography guest lecture»
- less lectures and labs!!! »
- Faster response to labs and new punch machine.»
- literature give arent relevant, the exam question is too focus on small detail, need too much memorizing nor understanding»
- more group assignment to let students to understand what they learn from lecture»

19. Additional comments

- The Exam paper could have been bit easier. Though I had read the Book morethan two times, It was hard to think and Qualitatively reason out the answers. I meant some questions atleast could have been pretty straight-forward. But I feel that, the Knowledge which I had gained from this Course is very High and I hope I will be more stronger when I start Working:).»
- Bad course in general»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.81

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.18
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.68

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från