Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Product Development Management, 2011 (IAR061), IAR061

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-10-28 - 2011-11-28
Antal svar: 22
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 40%
Kontaktperson: Lars Almefelt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

22 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»11 50%
Around 25 hours/week»6 27%
Around 30 hours/week»4 18%
At least 35 hours/week»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

22 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»7 31%
100%»15 68%

Genomsnitt: 4.68

- Not the reviews » (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

22 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 13%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»19 86%

Genomsnitt: 3.86

- Lars described them really well!» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

22 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»22 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

22 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 18%
Yes, definitely»18 81%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

22 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 9%
Large extent»10 45%
Great extent»10 45%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- Great lectures» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

21 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 23%
Large extent»9 42%
Great extent»7 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

22 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»12 54%
Very well»10 45%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

22 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 4%
Rather good»8 36%
Very good»12 54%
I did not seek help»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.59

- Did not get any help with the topic report, even on the guidance meeting with Lars he didn"t want to read the report nor answer what to improve or at what level it was on or his expectations on the result.» (Rather poor)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

22 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»5 22%
Very well»17 77%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

- Nice with randomly assigned groups!» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

22 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 4%
Adequate»12 54%
High»9 40%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- A lot to read, not much focus on understanding but more on definitions and specific methods. » (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

22 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 4%
Adequate»12 54%
High»6 27%
Too high»3 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

22 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 4%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»10 45%
Excellent»11 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

- Too many elements! Seminars with and-inns, games, written exams, report, case lecture etc. » (Good)
- A fun course and a great introduction course to the Masters. » (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Interesting lectures»
- The content of the book, that is, all the usefull methods and the understanding of management. »
- Workshops»
- Topic Report»
- The literature reviews, maybe even extending them.»
- The group assignment played a larger part in the course. »
- Lars Trygg!»
- The literature reviws.»
- the litterature seminars are great!»
- Lars is a very good lecturer and he is very intresting to listen to. I liked the Literature reviews as well. They gave a deeper understanding for the literature we were supposed to read.»
- The topic report assignment, the lean development game and the literature review meetings. »
- The literature reviews should definetly be preserved, Therese were excellent to help understand the course literature.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Topic reports may not have been the best way of learning about these different concepts. Maybe some other kind of project where you can utilize the things that you were suppose to learn with the topic reports would be a better way of learning. »
- More guidance for the topic report, less course elements.»
- Adittion with more modern litterature»
- The topic reports shouldn"t be included in the exam. It would be better if there was an extra assignment to make sure that everybody have read them.»
- Keep it the way it is. »
- Not much»
- Nothing. I liked this course.»
- I think it would be good to get the answers to the textexam as well to see how broad answers that are needed.»

16. Additional comments

- Lars is a great lecturer!»
- A great course handled excellently by Professor Lars Trygg. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från