|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Advanced Computer-Aided Design, 2011 (PPU080), PPU080Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2011-10-28 - 2011-11-28 Antal svar: 38 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 47% Kontaktperson: Lars Almefelt» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.38 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.28 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?38 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.18 - Attended no lectures, only computer labs.» (25%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?38 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.89 - It"s difficult to understand for me because I"m an Erasmus student so some of the terms were not clear, it was difficult to see exactly what it means in my own language.» (The goals are difficult to understand) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 - However, it is really basic and from the beginning, so calling it advanced computer aided design is very misleading!» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?35 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.02 - The excavator-assignment was a trial-and-error assignment, and the exercise-leaders didn"t even know the goals when passing people on that part. The written exam was relevant to the goals.» (No, not at all) 6. Was the setup of the project work good for learning CAD and CAT systems?(e.g. excavator model, extra points for extra tasks, ...)38 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.76 - Exercises basic, excavator project to general and large. Many low detailed parts instead of few realy advanced parts with difficult surfaces. Extra tasks consistet of "knowing" the basics of some extra features...» (No, not at all) Teaching and course administration7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?38 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.68 - Had another course that had lectures exacly the same times» (Small extent) 8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?38 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.73 - The slides with theory-info for the exam were good.» (Small extent) 9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?38 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.07 - Hand ins were easy. Pdf easily downloadable. Up to date info...» (Rather well) Study climate10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?38 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.07 - Few teachers who didn"t could CAD enough » (Very poor) 11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?38 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.63 - had a lot of comunication problems with my partner.» (Very poorly) 12. How was the course workload?38 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.07 13. How was the total workload this study period?38 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.44 - Other cource had higher workload so balanced out.» (Adequate) Summarizing questions14. What is your general impression of the course?38 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.97 - To have a written exam in CAD is a joke» (Poor) 15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- I didn"t get the point of written exam and the things we had to study for it. I would prefer to learn more about the CATIA in practice than the information I even can"t remember now. »- The Catia exercise» - Some kind of project, but not in the same way.» - Having a project to work and learn from was good. However another project is needed.» - Ofcourse, the larger part of the course is the project work where the software can be put to use in the best way. This should definitely be preserved.» - The project work» - The project work, work in computer rooms» - Computer exercices» - The project» - -stora projekt med hjälp från övningsledare -bra med egen problemlösning -bra att få tillgång till litteratur, som vi dessutom slapp betala för» - The project, though it would be interesting to do something other than the previous years project as well» - The project» - The projekt was a good part of the course, you learned very much from it.» 16. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Lectures where Lars goes through how Catia works can be skipped or moved to a computer lab where the students can follow on their own computers. Also a lot of the material in the couse doesn"t feel relevant. Sure, it can be intresting but most likely we will never have any use of computer graphics etc »- Type of project, and it should be a bigger part of the course (the exam shouldn"t be in focus), better help and more exercise-leaders, more project time scheduled. » - Lectures need to be relevant. Cource needs to focus on indepth advanced tools and techniques for CAD modeling. Project needs to be consistend of fewer parts and more specified specificaions and dimensions to practice real world CAD scenarios and not "do what you want in the program" learning. Helpers in the CAD exercises need more knowledge in the programs to provide help if not offer to look things up for the students that they dont know. Test in the end might aswell be changed for something else??? Since not realy usefull information.» - I feel this still doesn"t need a written examination since the individual is best tested on the outcome of the project work. And learning the literature, to a large extent, doesn"t mean anything in the course.» - More assistant teachers» - A lot of the material in the lectures seems irrelevant or has little connection to the actual use of the CAD systems and the project. Learning the material for the exam is rather based on memorization than understanding, and that is of no benefit to the student. The time spent on some of the lecture material, could be used for teaching how to use the tools that are to be used in the extra tasks of the project, to give more thorough and practical knowledge of Catia, for example Tube design or Ergonomic Analysis. » - The exam was unneccessary and the focus of the questions were too specific.» - Maybe insist more on the extra tasks: we need to discover them even if we don"t want to.» - The theoretical part. It don´,t give anything. Try to turn the lectures to a more helpful structure of how to CAD smart. From the course name, Advanced CAD, i expect myself to have a advanced knowlegde in CAD. Now I don´,t. » - The exam. Felt totally unneccessary» - -mer fokus på cad och mindre fokus på vad som händer i datorsystemet. -föreläsningar i cadsal» - The lectures. Do them online or make them shorter, alternatively do them in a computerenviroment like E-studion.» - The help seasons should include more assistance» - The exam could be a much smaller part of the course. The modelling should be a larger part. » - The exam should be more relevant. Perhaps a computer exam» 17. Additional comments- in order to calculate the grade, the coarse pm and the teacher weren"t the same. It must be changed until next year»- The exercise-leaders had so much to do when people wanted to get their projects approved, so they had no time for helping the students, and when approving the different parts, the standard was really low because they were so stressed. So maybe a few more exercise-leaders, at least in the end of the course, would be a good idea!» - I do not think that the examination was done in the best way. It was good with the project, but I do not think that the exam tested what you vad learned since it focused too much on small details and not the important things.» 18. What master program do you attend?37 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.37 - Applied mechanics» (Other)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26%