ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

IDE: Theory and methodology (2011), PPU090

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-10-25 - 2011-11-02
Antal svar: 22
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 64%
Kontaktperson: Oskar Rexfelt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

22 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 22%
Around 20 hours/week»8 36%
Around 25 hours/week»7 31%
Around 30 hours/week»2 9%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.27

- But far more last two weeks.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- I found the course interesting so i probably spent more time than needed» (Around 25 hours/week)
- Intense, but you get your CSN value...!» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

22 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 9%
100%»20 90%

Genomsnitt: 4.9

- I didn"t listened to everything when there was lessions with examples from research on chalmers. Some of these lessons were so boring..» (100%)
- Motivating with tutoring of high quality due to knowledge within both the area and the english language.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

22 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 9%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 27%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»14 63%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- I dont remember them now» (I have not seen/read the goals)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

21 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»20 95%
No, the goals are set too high»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.04

- One of the few courses that were "hard enough" in regards to time spent and the thinking required. Just don"t make it harder because then I think many people would just give up.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

20 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 15%
Yes, definitely»14 70%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

22 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 18%
Large extent»13 59%
Great extent»5 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.04

- A lot of knowledge was acquired through previous years» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

22 svarande

Small extent»1 4%
Some extent»10 45%
Large extent»9 40%
Great extent»2 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.54

- Individual assignments demands a wide spread of help in form of both literature and tutoring.» (Some extent)
- But for the projects, we chose our own material so... yeah. Some more would have been great!» (Large extent)
- found our own material which is a great way to force oneself to critically assess the compiled information and sort out the most relevant parts» (Great extent)
- Most of the literature was gathered by myself as one of the assignments was to learn of a topic of your own choice. I learned a great deal though. » (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

22 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»11 50%
Very well»11 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- not a big fan of pingpong, otherwise it worked well» (Rather well)
- Not all lectures were available on ping-pong.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

22 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 18%
Very good»16 72%
I did not seek help»2 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- Quick replies» (Very good)
- asked a few questions and got the answers that i needed, MariAnne is very busy but still found time to answer mails» (Very good)
- Very skilled examiner» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

22 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»6 27%
Very well»14 63%
I did not seek cooperation»2 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

- A lot of strangers the first weeks» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

22 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 4%
Adequate»16 72%
High»5 22%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

12. How was the total workload this study period?

22 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 4%
Adequate»13 59%
High»8 36%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.31

- my other course also took a lot of time» (High)
- We actually had to work our 50 hours/week this time...» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

22 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 13%
Good»13 59%
Excellent»6 27%

Genomsnitt: 4.13

- A good startup on the masters program» (Adequate)
- Interesting when you get to choose the subject of deeper study yourself.» (Good)
- MariAnne is a great tutor with excellent language skills and personal interest in what everyone do. I got the impression that she knew everything worth to know and she taught us very well. She made a "boring" course interesting. » (Good)
- Ive been studying similar things during exchange studies but I think this kind of course is really important since its concluding what has been teached so far during the education. Its also important to get some knowledge about ongoing research since it might interest many students in terms of future career.» (Good)
- Eventhough we all knew the basics of the PDP, I felt that this course brought a new and interessting perspective. » (Good)
- I found the subject very interesting and it was presented and worked through in a good and understandable way.» (Excellent)
- Made me want to go into the research field actually!» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- mariann´,s lectures, easy english to understand.»
- the final assignment, fine opportunity to study and do some asic research on our own»
- MariAnne»
- everything»
- Lectures and assignments in general, and the seminar was nice, keep that!»
- The individual assignments.»
- Ongoing research and presentation about methods to be used in different phases of the pd-process. It was a good balance in different research topics. I think its important to present state-of-the-art research, particularly in Sustainable development, since Chalmers is supposed to be a leading university in the area. Maybe this kind of research briefing could be even more emphasized? Not necessarily to inspire students to start doing research but to provide information, which will help students using up to date methods and perform project work that will contribute to the world development progress. »
- Assignment 4- very exciting to study an area of your own interest The seminars- I believe that I learned much from these »
- The wide variaty of lecturers and subjects, and the assignments.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- more seminars/discussions»
- The guest lectures wasn´,t very interesting »
- Move the tutering of assignment 4 so it is placed later in the study period and that we have come far enough in order to have use of the tutoring.»

16. Additional comments

- actually one of the most interesting courses so far during my years at chalmers»
- none »
- It is very important that the feedback from the first assignment is provided before starting the following essay. Students must be able to learn from their mistakes in order to produce a better result in the second assignment. I think this functioned rather well but some students were provided feedback too late.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från