Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Ship Geometry and Hydrostatics 2011, MMA136

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-10-24 - 2011-11-11
Antal svar: 27
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 84%
Kontaktperson: martin schreuder»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

27 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»8 29%
Around 20 hours/week»8 29%
Around 25 hours/week»10 37%
Around 30 hours/week»1 3%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

- The contant is reletively easy so I do not need to spend so much time.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

27 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 3%
50%»0 0%
75%»6 22%
100%»20 74%

Genomsnitt: 4.66

- 100% of the classes i was able to» (75%)
- I only missed one Tutorium» (100%)
- ~90%» (100%)
- lite för lugnt start» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

27 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 11%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»8 29%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»16 59%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

24 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 8%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»22 91%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.91

- Too basic for people who are already bachelors in Naval Architecture» (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

25 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»8 32%
Yes, definitely»16 64%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- the exam was good.» (Yes, definitely)

6. To what extent has the Lectures been of help for your learning?

27 svarande

Small extent»1 3%
Some extent»8 29%
Large extent»15 55%
Great extent»3 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.74

- lack of preparation from the teachers» (Some extent)
- Very bad structure and slides on the lectures, although the lecturer has a lot of knowledge» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the Design Classes been of help for your learning?

27 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»12 44%
Large extent»12 44%
Great extent»3 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

8. To what extent has the Tutorials been of help for your learning?

27 svarande

Small extent»5 18%
Some extent»4 14%
Large extent»15 55%
Great extent»3 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.59

- huge lack of preparation and no corrected answers for the tasks to do at home (and also hard to read).» (Small extent)
- not until schroeder had the tutorials they were to any help. feels like we missed a lot of the basic knowledge when we moved on. Poorly prepared. dissappointing» (Small extent)
- Was a bit shaky when Kjellberg had the tutorials, better with schreuder!» (Some extent)
- The later tutorials with Schreuder were much better and he could answer questions in a good way» (Large extent)
- They got better when Martin Schreuder started to lead them» (Large extent)

9. What do you think about the COS exercise?

27 svarande

very bad»0 0%
rather bad»8 29%
rather good»12 44%
very good»7 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.96

- Didn"t learn too much» (rather bad)
- was not able to attend at this time» (rather bad)
- It shows the principle of ship stability very clearly and in my oppinion makes them a lot more understandable.» (very good)

Teaching and course administration

What do you think about the COS exercise?

10. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

26 svarande

Small extent»3 11%
Some extent»11 42%
Large extent»11 42%
Great extent»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.38

- det var mycket i kompendiet som inte behövde» (?)
- Badly written book. Better with some modern literature.» (Small extent)
- The litterature (compendium) is good.» (Large extent)

11. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

27 svarande

Very badly»1 3%
Rather badly»7 25%
Rather well»15 55%
Very well»4 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

- Bad because of the lack of asnwers (corrected and readable). Also no information about what tasks to do and when etc, no information about what the different questions was about (at the beginning)» (Rather badly)
- kan vara bättre uppdaterade svar på övningsuppgifterna » (Rather badly)
- vary few and very old old exams. slides from rpnny had errors that were to be corrected, but that never happened. lots of errors in solutions from both exams and training assignments» (Rather badly)
- It was good when you did the new one, it was a bit messy before.» (Rather well)

Study climate

12. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

27 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 3%
Rather good»12 44%
Very good»10 37%
I did not seek help»4 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

27 svarande

Very poorly»1 3%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»7 25%
Very well»19 70%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

- Ritsalen makes it easy to study together!» (Very well)

14. How was the course workload?

27 svarande

Too low»1 3%
Low»5 18%
Adequate»17 62%
High»4 14%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- This was not a heavy course.» (Low)

15. How was the total workload this study period?

27 svarande

Too low»2 7%
Low»3 11%
Adequate»18 66%
High»4 14%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- The other course (Marine transport systems) took a lot of time (reading the book...) which was also a bit of waste of time.» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

16. What is your general impression of the course?

27 svarande

Poor»3 11%
Fair»1 3%
Adequate»7 25%
Good»14 51%
Excellent»2 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- What I"ve learnt from this course (and this applies to Marine transport systems as well) could have been learnt in alot shorter time if there was better conditions for learning. More structure etc.» (Poor)
- lectures and tutorials did not fulfill my expectations on a master program with such good reputation. very bad sync between different lecturers/teachers» (Fair)
- It was a good start course.» (Good)

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the COS exercise»
- Design classes»
- The Design Courses»
- design class»
- COS exercise was good»
- A good course with good teachers»
- the tutorial and the design project»
- design project well planned and learnt a lot»
- COS exercise»
- everything»
- Martin Schreuder as leader of the tutorials»

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- tutorials»
- The content of tutorials»
- The contant about ship geometry should be in detailed and more pratical.»
- The tutorials»
- Exercises where unstructured and confusing»
- an extra teacher in design class when the class is as big as this year»
- The COS exersise was rather poor, didn´,t lern much from it.»
- better power points»
- Lectures need more and better structure, as well as the tutorials. more and better material on the webpage. the old exams posted there were not very similar to the one we got.»
- add in more details and and it is room to extend the course somewhat»
- Martin Kjellberg as leader of the tutorials»

19. Additional comments

- There might be more exercise types we can practice before the exam»
- I hope I don"t offend anyone, but the course was really lacking of structure.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från