Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Design for Quality, 2011/2012 sp2, TEK161

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-12-03 - 2011-12-16
Antal svar: 16
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 43%
Kontaktperson: Marcus Assarlind»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

State total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

16 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 6%
Around 20 hours/week»7 43%
Around 25 hours/week»6 37%
Around 30 hours/week»2 12%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.56

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

16 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»3 18%
75%»4 25%
100%»9 56%

Genomsnitt: 4.37

- missed one class.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

16 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 25%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 18%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 56%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 7%
Yes, definitely»11 78%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

- I feel like the word max is too low compared to how comprehensive the questions are and that most of the time i spent on fitting all i wanted to say into the maximum amount of words. I understand that there is a limit but it feel like the answers are really specific and to get everything in that is wanted, you have to gamble a little and you have to keep it very brief. eg a paragraph introducing the subject and a paragraph finish up at the end would be so helpful for coherency, but there is just no way to fit it in. This bothers me a little, because i want to write well, and its just not possible. Rather i try to say everything with the shortest possible sentences and elaborating as little as possible, and though that might be a good experience when i start working, i dont see how it relates to the course goals» (To some extent)
- Great way to examine the course, really put your knowledge to the test.» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 20%
Large extent»10 66%
Great extent»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.93

- Ida"s probably the most competent lecturer i"ve ever had but she must keep her voice loud and reasonable slow. Sometimes she seemed to lose interest in being pedagogical and just race through the sentences which really kills my interest for the subject.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 18%
Large extent»10 62%
Great extent»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Hendry Raharjo"s article about QFD was not helpful in any way. All it did was confuse me.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

16 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»8 50%
Very well»8 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- ping pong would be nice, since we have our other courses there» (Rather well)
- it is good that next year, the course webpage will move to pingpong.» (Rather well)
- Really liked Ida"s ambition to keep us informed and give quick feedback.» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

16 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 18%
Very good»12 75%
I did not seek help»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.87

- Probably the most competent lecturer i"ve ever had. Just hope she"ll put a little more effort into her regular lectures as well.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

16 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 6%
Rather well»5 31%
Very well»10 62%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.56

- Different approaches and methodology in the beginning, worked better after discussion. » (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»10 62%
High»6 37%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

12. How was the total workload this study period?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 6%
Adequate»6 37%
High»9 56%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- high but manageable.» (High)


Please contribute with constructive comments regarding teaching individuals

13. Ida Gremyr

DfQ - Lectures and seminar
Kano model - Lectures
RDM/DfSS - Lectures and seminar
Case Supervision
Case presentations
and more..

- Good lecturer»
- very good teaching overall»
- Good, the seminars "forced" you to read and reflect over the literature which is good if you lack selfdicipline. Often good examples and interesting to see examples of the homeexam questions prior to the exam. »
- Very good. Excellent teacher.»
- Very good, is intressting to listen to. Have very good knowledge of the areas.»
- Very nice and good pedagogical work.»
- I like Ida! Though i think she makes sneaky home exams, where there really is only one right answer if you want full points»
- good lecturer, but sometimes we found the questions in literature seminar materials are a little bit confused.»
- Very good teacher!»
- Keep your voice up and really think on how your tone and pace in speaking affects the interest we students have in your topic. Sadly, every 45 minutes contained some minutes where i found it hard to follow your reasoning and hear what you are saying and I don"t find it polite asking every time that happens. Again, probably the most competent lecturer we"ve ever had at I, so this should be a quick fix really worth while. Thanks for a great course!!»

14. Marcus Assarlind

Kano model - Seminar
and more..

- didnt meet him»
- Did not meet him.»
- good»
- sorry, not in his group»
- Did not attend»
- Don"t remember this lecture, maybe I missed it.»
- Quite alright. Could been a bit clearer regarding pass/redo the preparation assignment»

15. Hendry Raharjo

QFD - Lecture
DoE - Lab

- Very passionate about his work. However, the lecture where he went through his own article was very confusing and I did not understand much at all.»
- Good, plenty of examples that contributes to learning and very eiger to teach»
- Very good, always intresting.Pedagogical.»
- Hard on the supervision when he did not really know the task we got. The answers were absolutely correct, but not always relevant for our case. Very nice and helpful person.»
- lectures were a little long, but very knowledgeable »
- very good for answering our questions»
- Good as always»
- Always interesting and fun!»
- Was a bit unclear on the supervision, was not completely synced with »

16. Bo Bergman

DoE - Lecture

- Since he is one of the writers of the course book it is natural that ha goes through more or less exactly the same things as in the book. Unfortunately, this does not add very much to my knowledge.»
- Felt to abstract and was hard to grasph, needed Hendrys lecture to understand. »
- Nice to meet him, but we do already now basic statistics. Good repetition.»
- nice »
- Good»
- Missed this one»
- missed the lecture»

17. Vanajah Siva

RDM - Seminar
Kano - Presentation

- Gave good feedback after the Kano presentation»
- good»
- nice»
- Good, but would appreciate if she could evaluate and describe more»
- Gave good feedback, that"s all i remember.»
- Only Kano presentation: Good feedback.»

18. Martin Arvidsson

RDM - Guest Lecture, Cochlear

- Godd lecturer but to much examples, more or less the same things over and over again»
- Good in the sence that it connected DoE and RDM. »
- ok»
- Dit not attend»
- Interesting!»
- Very hands on with practical examples, gave a good idea about how the methods are used.»

19. Katarin Brantin

DfSS - Guest Lecture, SCA

- Felt like a step back, she presented methods in almost the same way as whe have learned them without adding to the understanding. »
- Should have gotten better info before the lecture. It should have been more interesting if she told us HOW they use the tools and techniques in real life. Now she got stuck in talking about all the tools...»
- a little late this lecture»
- Good»
- Good lecture but i found it hard to see a purpose of it. Might help to state a clear goal with it.»
- Seemed briefed badly, very much repetition. Would have been better if it had been more practical examples.»

20. Do you think these subjects would be useful to maintain in the course?


- The DoE took too much space. The lectures was only reading the book again, not so interesting. The helicopters were more instructive.»
- DFSS and RDM feel pretty fuzzy»
- No clue. Really depends on what other models there are out there.»

Design for Quality
16 svarande

Definately not»0 0%
No»0 0%
Maybe»4 25%
Yes»3 18%
Definately»9 56%
Did not participate»0

Genomsnitt: 4.31

Kano Model
16 svarande

Definately not»0 0%
No»0 0%
Maybe»2 12%
Yes»2 12%
Definately»12 75%
Did not participate»0

Genomsnitt: 4.62

Quality Function Deployment
16 svarande

Definately not»0 0%
No»0 0%
Maybe»2 12%
Yes»3 18%
Definately»11 68%
Did not participate»0

Genomsnitt: 4.56

Design of Experiments
16 svarande

Definately not»0 0%
No»1 6%
Maybe»3 18%
Yes»7 43%
Definately»5 31%
Did not participate»0

Genomsnitt: 4

Robust Design Methodology
16 svarande

Definately not»0 0%
No»0 0%
Maybe»2 12%
Yes»7 43%
Definately»7 43%
Did not participate»0

Genomsnitt: 4.31

Design for Six Sigma
16 svarande

Definately not»0 0%
No»0 0%
Maybe»3 18%
Yes»4 25%
Definately»9 56%
Did not participate»0

Genomsnitt: 4.37

21. To what extent did the group assignments contribute to your learning?


Kano case
16 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»3 18%
Large extent»7 43%
Great extent»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 3

QFD case
16 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»3 18%
Large extent»8 50%
Great extent»4 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.93

DoE lab
16 svarande

Small extent»2 12%
Some extent»8 50%
Large extent»3 18%
Great extent»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.43

22. Additional literature seminars

This year, there have been three literature seminars, and all have been compulsory. How would you like it if there instead were literature seminars every week (of which you had to attend at least three)?

16 svarande

That would be worse»1 6%
That would not matter much»5 31%
That would be better»8 50%
It should definitely be like that»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.68

- Three compulsory seminars are good, dont change.» (That would not matter much)
- I really don"t know, I liked it this way but it would probably be good like that too.» (That would not matter much)
- it was really good» (That would be better)
- It would help so much for the home exam i think» (That would be better)
- Then you could prioritize and match with your private schedule better» (That would be better)
- Every chance to gauge your own ideas is good!» (That would be better)

Summarizing questions

23. What is your general impression of the course?

16 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 6%
Good»11 68%
Excellent»4 25%

Genomsnitt: 4.18

- DfSS is still Fuzzy ,-)» (Good)
- Very challenging and interesting! Ida"s great but needs to speak up during lectures, otherwise she"s really the best examiner i"ve ever had.» (Excellent)

24. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Ida, and Henry at QFD.»
- Ida»
- literature seminar, though i dont understand why they are compulsory. the quality is so much better at activities where we get to choose on our own to come »
- Home exam»
- The concept with home exam. Ida Gremyr!!»

25. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The helicopter lab.»
- I think that more cases or labs to learn more about the methods. It was during these I learned the most. Otherwise it is just the facts about the methods and not how to use them, which I think is the most important. »
- i think the home exam is too sneaky. i feel like there are specific things that you are supposed to mention, and the word limit is so tight that there is no room for mentioning anything else, so i felt like i had to gamble, "should i include this part or this part...which will ida want more". I DO like that there is a word limit, but either i think there should be bullet list of things to include, or their should be an opportunity to ask someone during the course of the exam»
- the deadline of QFD case.Since the deadlines of QFD and two other group assignments in Lars" course are very close.all the groups divided the assignments and we only participated in one or two of these three assignments and that is not good for studying »
- Clarification of the home exam»

26. Additional comments

- Interesting doing a home exam for the first time, it was more of a learning experience than I expected.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från