ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Course evaluation, TME225

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-10-24 - 2011-11-24
Antal svar: 28
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Lars Davidson»

Your own effort

1. How was the course workload?

28 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 7%
Adequate»23 82%
Too high»3 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.03

- The course contents are too low for a masters course in fluid mechanics.» (Low)
- The course load was very good (compared to the Mechanics of Solids which was way too heavy).» (Adequate)
- quit large in the beginning but when understanding index notation it was quite ok» (Adequate)
- Taking another course which weren"t "Mechanics of Solids" was demanding during the first weeks. Making a joint course of Fluids and Solids is a good thing in a lot of aspects, but put a big workload on people not following the masters programme. » (Too high)
- To much to do with the handinds.» (Too high)
- Every hour spend on this course until study week 7 was spent on solving the assignments and not on the learning outcomes. (same for the other course)» (Too high)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

28 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 3%
50%»1 3%
75%»6 21%
100%»20 71%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

- Good explanations.» (100%)
- But just the lectures and not the tutoring» (100%)
- necessary» (100%)

3. How much time did you spend on this course, as compared to the course "Mechanics of solids"?

28 svarande

Much less»0 0%
Less»4 14%
Similar»16 57%
More»1 3%
Much more»2 7%
I haven"t done the other course»5 17%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

4. How understandable are the course goals (i.e. the learning oucomes)?

28 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 3%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 3%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 21%
The goals clearly describes what I am supposed to learn»20 71%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- Looked at them after the course ..» (The goals clearly describes what I am supposed to learn)
- Very good approach to use detailed learning objectives.» (The goals clearly describes what I am supposed to learn)
- verry good when prepairing and repeating for exam» (The goals clearly describes what I am supposed to learn)

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

28 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 7%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»25 89%
No, the goals are set too high»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 1.96

- I would personally like a litle more problem solving, instead of all the derivations.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
- to much because there are two courses.» (No, the goals are set too high)

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

27 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 11%
Yes, definitely»22 81%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.96

- but to short time on exam.» (Yes, definitely)
- some from each part» (Yes, definitely)

7. How much did the assignments A1-A13 help you to reach the goals?

28 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
To some extent»20 71%
Much»8 28%
I»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

- The assignment was difficult but I think it was a good start on the course.» (To some extent)
- But mostly to understand index notation» (To some extent)
- A1-A13 served more as a basis for the what would come later in the course.» (To some extent)

8. How much did TME225 Assignment 1 help you to reach the goals?

28 svarande

Not at all»2 7%
To some extent»9 32%
Much»17 60%

Genomsnitt: 2.53

- There is not enough time for in depth study and thought in 6-7weeks.» (To some extent)
- But why not learn out the command gradient instead of using the ((n)-(n-1))-stuff» (Much)
- helped understand the physical reason» (Much)

9. How much did TME225 Assignment 2 help you to reach the goals?

28 svarande

not much»2 7%
to some extent»9 32%
much»17 60%

Genomsnitt: 2.53

- » (much)
- helped understand the physical reason» (much)

Teaching and course administration

10. To what extent has the lectures in part I (together with Mechanics of solids) been of help for your learning?

28 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»10 35%
Large extent»16 57%
Great extent»2 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

- In my opinion, continuum mechanics is a subject so fundamental that such a short introduction can never be enough.» (Some extent)
- easier to understand when it was used later in the course» (Some extent)

11. To what extent has the tutorials/supervision in part I (together with Mechanics of solids) been of help for your learning?

28 svarande

small extent»4 14%
some extent»10 35%
large extent»11 39%
great extent»3 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.46

- Didn"t go» (small extent)

12. To what extent has the lectures in part II (fluid mechanics and turbulence) been of help for your learning?

27 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»8 29%
Large extent»9 33%
Great extent»10 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

- Unfortunately, errors and mistakes were too frequent during the lectures.» (Some extent)
- Lada"s literature was great, so I mostly learned by reading» (Some extent)
- summarys combined with lecture notes were good» (Large extent)

13. To what extent has the workshops in the computer room in part II (fluid mechanics and turbulence) been of help for your learning?

28 svarande

small extent»4 14%
some extent»8 28%
large extent»11 39%
great extent»5 17%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- Mostly learned by myself» (small extent)
- was mostly used to debug programs» (some extent)

14. To what extent has the Reddy book been of help for your learning?

28 svarande

Small extent»16 57%
Some extent»10 35%
Large extent»2 7%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

- I did not bought the book.» (Small extent)
- Didn"t buy it» (Small extent)
- opened it max 10 times during solids and fluid course together» (Small extent)

15. To what extent did you solve the problems in Reddy"s book and M1-M23?

27 svarande

Small extent (< 20%)»12 44%
Some extent (30-60%)»8 29%
Large extent (60-80%)»5 18%
Great extent (> 80%)»2 7%

Genomsnitt: 1.88

16. To what extent has the lecture notes in part I been of help for your learning?

28 svarande

Small extent»3 10%
Some extent»6 21%
Large extent»15 53%
Great extent»4 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

17. To what extent has the lecture notes in part II (fluid mechanics and turbulence) been of help for your learning?

28 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»7 25%
Great extent»21 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- The lecture notes are excellent.» (Great extent)
- verry good structure and explaination good!» (Great extent)

18. To what extent has the lab demonstration been of help for your learning?

28 svarande

Small extent»7 25%
Some extent»13 46%
Large extent»6 21%
Great extent»2 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

- Gunnar was great, but it was hard to understand anyway» (Some extent)
- physical understanding of eddies» (Some extent)

19. To what extent has the movies on the web page been of help for your learning?

28 svarande

Small extent»5 17%
Some extent»14 50%
Large extent»4 14%
Great extent»5 17%

Genomsnitt: 2.32

- It did a good job illustration the different phenomena.» (Some extent)

20. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

28 svarande

Very badly»1 3%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»10 35%
Very well»17 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- verry verry good structure for both solid and fluid courses» (Very well)

Study climate

21. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

28 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 10%
Very good»21 75%
I did not seek help»4 14%

Genomsnitt: 4.03

- Teachers were always available to help. Greatly appreciated!» (Very good)
- both after lecture, on computer assignmens and other times» (Very good)

22. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

28 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»8 28%
Very well»18 64%
I did not seek cooperation»2 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.78

Summarizing questions

23. What is your general impression of the course?

28 svarande

Poor»1 3%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»4 14%
Good»16 57%
Excellent»7 25%

Genomsnitt: 4

- My first impression of the 4-quarter system at Chalmers was not good at all. I think that such a system leaves almost no freedom for self-study of the subjects as the student sees fit, considering his/her background, strengths/weaknesses, etc.» (Poor)
- Lectures and assignments.» (Good)
- Good course and even greater course book (the one written by Lars Davidsson).» (Excellent)

24. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The last week with only repetition was really good. It gave the time needed to go over everything a second time and see how it all comes together. It should absolutely be kept to next year and, if possible, recommended to other examinators if they want us students get a deeper knowledge for the future and not just knowledge to pass the exam.»
- Less derivations..more comments on the physical definitions.»
- The course goals»
- lecture notes, summarys»
- The assignments were good.»
- lab demonstration, movies»
- Everything»
- Computer assignments»
- structure»

25. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Again, with the 4-quarter system I can not see much room for improvement.»
- The lab demonstration. The wind tunnel part was good.»
- one AS instead of two»
- The continuum mechanics part did not seem of great relevance to the exam. So the two options are: include more of continuum mechanics on the exam or include less of the continuum mechanics at the beginning of the course.»
- -»
- don"t think the reddy book is necessary»

26. Additional comments

- I will write a more comprehensive review and submit it via email soon.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från