Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Design of microwave monolithic integrated circuits (MMIC), EME110, MPMPE, HT2011, EME110

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-10-19 - 2011-10-30
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 64%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

9 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 11%
Around 20 hours/week»2 22%
Around 25 hours/week»2 22%
Around 30 hours/week»1 11%
At least 35 hours/week»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- too much work» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 11%
100%»8 88%

Genomsnitt: 4.88

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

9 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- It is quite hard for erasmus students from abroad which have a different focus. But except for homework one it was feasible.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 22%
Yes, definitely»7 77%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- Still project part is left for examination which is the big part of this course.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 22%
Large extent»4 44%
Great extent»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

- Extremely helpfull staff. There was not a single time when i or my group needed guidence or help during project work and we did not get it from the concerning personnels.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»2 22%
Some extent»3 33%
Large extent»4 44%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.22

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»6 66%
Very well»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- We would like to have the slides in advance, so as to keep notes on them.» (Rather well)
- The slides were uploaded on the website quite late. However, they were being written almost at the same time as the lectures were taking place, so that is understandable.» (Rather well)
- The lectures where uploaded after sometime but they were there. The evaluation of the homeassignments took a very very long time to be available. » (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 22%
Very good»7 77%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

- The lecturer, Morteza, was eager to help at all moments. » (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 11%
Very well»8 88%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

11. How was the course workload?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
High»8 88%
Too high»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 4.11

- Course workload was a bit too high. It could have been managed in a better way i think.» (High)
- It is a demanding course.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 22%
High»5 55%
Too high»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 4

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»7 77%
Excellent»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 4.22

- It is in general a very good course. It covers a lot of topics and the project work is a good preparation for a thesis work. » (Good)
- The project is a good way to learn. It takes a lot of time to be realized, and the available time to do it is too short. » (Good)
- This is practical course in which we have used the tool that is using in the professional environment.I think this type of course should be include in every semester so that one can also learn the tools using by the professionals.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The design task»
- The Project work should be preserved next year for sure.»
- Some background knowledge about mixer and Oscillator should teach in detail in the courses before this course so that we have already basics of components like we have for amplifier design in active course.»
- Short contact between lecturer and students.»
- The way of teaching the course should definitely be kept.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- I think if Home assignments can be made more related to the lectures and course material provided during th course then it would be much better for us to solve and understand them easily. Some of the home assignments were too out of context and was too difficult to solve without having prior knowledge about those topics.»
- We have some small home task similar to labs which we had and it should contain some bonus marks as well.»
- Homework one had not much to do with the first lecture.»
- The labs were maybe too basic and could be solved in much less time than the 4 hours available. Perhaps some areas, such as the layout, could be explained and practised more. The quizzes should be clarified. We did not know when we were going to have one. The project should start before. I feel the results could have been much better had we had more time. Maybe a visit to a relevant company would be interesting.»
- Need more time for the project.»

16. Additional comments

- Excellent course with some really nice people in charge. The general pattern of the course should be maintained definitely. »
- Instructor and specially the project supervisor in really helpful. I should say special thanks to him :)»
- The course extent is probably too large to fit in just one period. For students pursuing a specialization in microwave, it is a very important course that should receive the amount of time it deserves.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från