Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Fundamentals of nanoscience, FKA131, MPNAT, HT2011, FKA131

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-10-18 - 2011-10-30
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 43%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Teknisk fysik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 28%
Around 20 hours/week»2 28%
Around 25 hours/week»1 14%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 28%
100%»5 71%

Genomsnitt: 4.71

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 14%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 14%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 57%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

- especially concidering the chemistry part» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 66%
No, the goals are set too high»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»1 16%
To some extent»4 66%
Yes, definitely»1 16%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Very much too difficult compared to the example - exam questions. If it is going to be that difficult then the example questions should as well so that we know beforehand. » (No, not at all)
- The level of the lectures diden"t meet the level of the exam on the chmestyr part.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»1 14%
Some extent»1 14%
Large extent»3 42%
Great extent»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»3 42%
Some extent»3 42%
Large extent»1 14%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.71

- Although other webbooks have helped» (Small extent)
- A book in quantum mecanics would be more usfull then the book now used. » (Small extent)
- files on homepage were useful» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»4 57%
Very well»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- Anders did very well. The chemistry part could have been better with solutions. » (Rather well)
- Chemistry parts should have handouts on homepage» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 14%
Very good»6 85%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 57%
Very well»3 42%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

11. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 57%
High»3 42%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

12. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 14%
Adequate»1 14%
High»4 57%
Too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- Took 3 courses, was a bad idea» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 28%
Adequate»1 14%
Good»4 57%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- It was hard to sometimes follow what was the most important to understand in some exams. Espescially the chemistry part. » (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The recitations and the lectures»
- The computer project»
- The calculation exersices were very good. »
- Problems sessions should be preserved and enhanced.»
- physics problem sessions»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Maybe just one computer project and then the other could be a normal hand in. Computer projects takes a very long time to do (last one about 1,5 week). Matlab is difficult when you are not used to it. »
- The chemestry part must be more balanced. The lectures were on very basic level and the training exersices aswell. The questions on the exam were more difficult. There has to be clearer what the course goal on the chemestry patr is. »
- It should be spent more time for problem session and less about theory aspects.»
- more chemistry material is needed: problems, solutions and course-book references.»

16. Additional comments

- There were too many things to learn. I wanted to discuss physical meanings of each formulas.»
- Not so much new material. (Background in Physics)»

Kursutvärderingssystem från