ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Electromagnetic waves and components, RRY036, MPWPS, HT2011, RRY036

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-10-21 - 2011-10-30
Antal svar: 17
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 58%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

17 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»6 35%
Around 20 hours/week»5 29%
Around 25 hours/week»3 17%
Around 30 hours/week»3 17%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.17

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

17 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»4 23%
75%»6 35%
100%»7 41%

Genomsnitt: 4.17

- I did not attend all the excersises.» (75%)
- Good lectures!» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

17 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 17%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»9 52%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 29%

Genomsnitt: 2.94

- The content of the course did not match the goals. There were no lectures on transmission lines.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 92%
No, the goals are set too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

15 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»8 53%
Yes, definitely»6 40%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.53

- The exam tested on stuff that we had done but 18 points of the exam was about things he maybe had gone through on the lectures but not calculated and there was no excersises to do on those kind of questions. And if you wanted to do them there wasn"t enough time to do it. The parts that we had done alot didn"t came much on the exam.» (To some extent)
- Way too long exam» (To some extent)
- The exam was hard, but it is good to keep the high level!» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»4 23%
Large extent»7 41%
Great extent»5 29%

Genomsnitt: 2.94

- Very uniteresting teaching. Most of the time we were told things that we didn"t need to pass the course.» (Small extent)
- great teacher i think!» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»4 23%
Large extent»10 58%
Great extent»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.76

- some questions for the hand ins» (Some extent)
- Orfanidis isn"t that good! The course might be better with a paid book.» (Some extent)
- Orfanidis is great!» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

17 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 11%
Rather well»7 41%
Very well»8 47%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- No problems» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

17 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 5%
Rather good»5 29%
Very good»8 47%
I did not seek help»3 17%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

17 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»5 29%
Very well»10 58%
I did not seek cooperation»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.82

11. How was the course workload?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 6%
Adequate»10 62%
High»4 25%
Too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.31

12. How was the total workload this study period?

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»11 64%
High»4 23%
Too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.29

Course specific questions

13. How would you rate the lectures given by Hans Nordman?

17 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Mediocre»1 5%
OK»3 17%
Good»4 23%
Excellent»9 52%

Genomsnitt: 4.23

- Unrelevant material.» (Mediocre)
- I liked the lectures but it felt like he did it more complicated than it was.» (Good)
- great teacher, makes the curse easier i think. » (Excellent)

14. How would you (on average) rate the lectures given by other teachers?

Please comment to let us know which teacher you mean if you have a very negative or positive comment to make here.

17 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Mediocre»1 5%
OK»8 47%
Good»6 35%
Excellent»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.52

- It was a bit much last 4 hours straight of information, would have been better to have this spread out or something.» (Good)
- Arto could have been clearer on certain points.» (Good)

15. How would you rate the tutorials?

17 svarande

Poor»7 41%
Mediocre»6 35%
OK»3 17%
Good»1 5%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.88

- Did go on the first one, never again. He didn"t seem to want to be there.» (Poor)
- It was impossible to follow the tutorials. The teacher had a hard time expressing himself in english and his writings were hard to follow.» (Poor)
- They were really bad, I skipped them. The course must have a good tutorial teacher!» (Poor)

16. How would you rate the labs?

17 svarande

Poor»1 5%
Mediocre»2 11%
OK»3 17%
Good»5 29%
Excellent»6 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

- For a student with a background in engineering physics many of the tasks were on a too low level, and the format of the labs was not appropriate for writing lab reports on. It is very hard to write a good report on 5 different, short subjects. The lab work was not distributed evenly between the two labs.» (Poor)
- Maybe to easy and the second lab was quite short. I think it gave a good feeling especially if you haven"t seen all the equipment. For those that had seen it I think they found it easy and boring.» (Good)
- They could have been harder, they were quite easy.» (Good)

17. How would you rate the voluntary hand-ins?

17 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Mediocre»0 0%
OK»2 11%
Good»8 47%
Excellent»7 41%

Genomsnitt: 4.29

- It"s good to get extra points for your early studing, but it would be better if the assignments on the hand-ins were closer to the exam assignments.» (Good)
- Very good to get started on the course with hand-ins!» (Good)
- Good questions in the hand ins. Great bonus point system! We also had a lot of time for the hand ins!» (Excellent)
- Good workload, good with some hard problem solving in the middle of the period and nice extra points to the exam.» (Excellent)

18. How would you rate the hologram home assignment?

17 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Mediocre»0 0%
OK»4 23%
Good»7 41%
Excellent»6 35%

Genomsnitt: 4.11

- It was rather fun.» (OK)
- Took too much time for not that much learning value.» (OK)
- Fun, but it took too much time to do.» (OK)
- i » (Excellent)

Summarizing questions

19. What is your general impression of the course?

17 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 11%
Adequate»2 11%
Good»10 58%
Excellent»3 17%

Genomsnitt: 3.82

- I liked those two laboratories and the course teachers! They were great and helpful. I think that Arto made the kvantum part more interesting than it would be if some other teacher did lecture it. » (Good)

20. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Hand ins (Bonus point system), laboratories and of course the kvantum part of the course!»
- The lab works.»
- Hans Nordman and hand-ins.»
- Really good lecture structure and labs»
- Hans!»
- Labs and hands in»

21. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- add some homework and do matlab simulaitions»
- Well, the exam: I think that the exam was reasonably difficult BUT it was soooooo many question that i didn"t even manage to handle the questions that i knew. I answered maybe 5 of 8 and i still had an idea of the two that were left. Hans part didn"t have only one question in his first questions, there were maybe 2-4 question in every question of the exam. 8 questions with additional question in it, in 4 hour exam is NOT enough! My grade will be much lower just because of the exam time or because of the exam length! Of course the stress did kick in when i saw 4 questions (with additional question in it) left when it only was 1 hour left. »
- Some new course book may be proposed»
- Tutorial leader, someone thats feels like doing it.»
- Putting more effort in organizing and preparing exercises.»
- The lab reports! Was hard to know if you wanted a real report or just answers... »
- The labs. The labs could be kept mainly as they are now, but with no report, or the report could be kept and the lab changed. If the report is kept, the lab tasks should be bigger, fewer and more similar in subject. There should be at least one lecture on transmission lines. (showing some slides very quickly does not count as a lecture)»
- The tutorials»
- Perhaps the tutorials, and maybe a better definition of what is expected as labs reports.»

22. Additional comments

- This course was useful,but in my opinion it is better to spend the time more on labs and other practical things »
- this course is good and give me many instructions for fundermental principles of EM field, and wish there are many practical experiments with the lecture to make it more understandable.»
- I think that this course is so interesting but the grade i will get will actually not be the grade of my knowledge. My grade of the course teachers is 5+ because they made the course much more interesting and easier to understand it.»
- The course felt like it was about wave propogation but then it was some other stuff that was just taken in to fill the course, like blackbody radiation. And i dont really know what the components are that the course name states. There was lack of excersises on some parts of the course and no old exams so it was quite hard to prepare for the exam on those parts.»
- It was quite tough to finish the exam in 4h.»
- Change the labs a bit, make them a little more challenging. :)»

Kursutvärderingssystem från