ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Fiber Optical Communication, MCC100, MPMPE, HT2011, MCC100

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-10-18 - 2011-10-30
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 82%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 14%
Around 20 hours/week»4 28%
Around 25 hours/week»6 42%
Around 30 hours/week»2 14%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- Some of the Home Assignments are too time consuming» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

14 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 14%
75%»4 28%
100%»8 57%

Genomsnitt: 4.42

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

13 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 7%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 15%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 76%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»14 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»9 64%
Yes, definitely»3 21%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- The examination did not reflect the topics that were covered in the lectures / labs / tutorials. » (To some extent)
- The questions that were thought to be the central concepts like those of Dispersion, Nonlinearities and EDFA"s wee not emphasized a lot on the exam.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 28%
Large extent»9 64%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.78

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»2 14%
Some extent»1 7%
Large extent»7 50%
Great extent»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- The material on the slides is good. Just to have a more active lecture it would be useful to have more figures than text. Sometimes is exhausting to see only text. A figure with reference to a section of the book could be better.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»5 35%
Very well»9 64%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

- But the results of the submitted home assignments took a very very long time. » (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 28%
Very good»10 71%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- Would be good if the slides are less in the lectures and the students can ask more questions and the lectures are meant to be like trying to finish all slides.» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

14 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 7%
Rather well»4 28%
Very well»9 64%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

11. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 35%
High»9 64%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

12. How was the total workload this study period?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 50%
High»5 35%
Too high»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

Course specific questions

13. How would you rate the lectures given by Pontus Johannisson?

14 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Mediocre»0 0%
OK»2 14%
Good»9 64%
Excellent»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

- some times there were a bit boring» (Good)

14. How would you rate the tutorials given by Krzysztof Szczerba?

14 svarande

Poor»1 7%
Mediocre»2 14%
OK»5 35%
Good»6 42%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- Sometimes he spoke a lot, trying to explain, rather than writing. In science equations are better than words.» (Poor)
- Have a little bit of more order on the exercise solutions could be helpful. Also since his handwritting can be some times difficult to understand it would be a good idea to have the solutions of the exercises solved in the tutorials on the webpage. » (OK)
- Sometimes, Krzysztof seemed unprepared for the tutorials.» (OK)

15. How would you rate lab exercise 1 "Dispersion and optical amplifiers"?

14 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Mediocre»1 7%
OK»5 35%
Good»5 35%
Excellent»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- The preparation took a long time because the topics had not been covered by the lecture by that time.» (OK)

16. How would you rate lab exercise 2 "Optical communication systems"?

14 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Mediocre»1 7%
OK»4 28%
Good»5 35%
Excellent»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- The lab was OK, but the LAB PM needs an update. There are many things that we didn"t do and others that we did with the guidance of the lab assistant that were not there.» (OK)

17. How would you rate the home assignments?

14 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Mediocre»0 0%
OK»7 50%
Good»5 35%
Excellent»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

- The first on was good, the second one too. The third one was a nice idea but the problem descriptions were not good. The fourth one was a little close to the exam.» (OK)
- but not enough time to finish the assignments» (Good)
- Home assignments were awesome. Would like to have more of these as they gave a great chance to discuss with fellow students and learn many concepts» (Excellent)

Summarizing questions

18. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 7%
Good»11 78%
Excellent»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

- I liked the labs and home assignments very much.» (Excellent)

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Pontus! He is a very good and devoted teacher. The lecture notes are good as well.»
- The lecture notes are good, but may need some refinement here and there. »
- Labs, Home assignments. »
- the labs and the home assignments»
- fallow the same»
- tutorial content seting»

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The tutorial might be reorganised so that students have to solve problems themselves during that time. Or at least solve things more interactively. This way the exercise was just copying from the board in a speed that did not enable one to think about the approaches.»
- The exam questions should match the topics covered in the lecture. »
- Tutorials may be done in a more interactive way and making students involve more. Give them some time in the tutorial to think on how they would like to solve the problem and then can provide the solution or even can ask the students to come and solve the solutions and students who did this can get an extra point. It would serve two purposes: the students will learn concepts, presentation skills and would also get bonus points.»
- the tutorials. example: we lost too much time in easy equasitions, when we should work with more complicated problems»
- nothing»
- no element should be definitely changed»

21. Additional comments

- I always had the impression that the teachers wanted us to understand the topics. Questions were always encouraged.»
- nothing»
- more description on eye diagram and PM&MzM modulators»

Kursutvärderingssystem från