Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Wireless and Photonics System Engineering, SSY085, MPWPS, HT2011, SSY085

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-10-18 - 2011-10-30
Antal svar: 19
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 47%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

19 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 15%
Around 20 hours/week»10 52%
Around 25 hours/week»4 21%
Around 30 hours/week»2 10%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.26

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

19 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 10%
75%»7 36%
100%»10 52%

Genomsnitt: 4.42

- Extremely good lectures! Keep up the good work! An extra "+" for the Simulink demos!» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

19 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 15%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 15%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»13 68%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

16 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»16 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

16 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 18%
Yes, definitely»12 75%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 15%
Large extent»9 47%
Great extent»7 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent»2 10%
Some extent»4 21%
Large extent»9 47%
Great extent»4 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.78

- the photonic books seems to be quite useless» (Large extent)
- Didn"t use the Photonics book» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

19 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»8 42%
Very well»11 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- Very good to that the lecture notes were handed out before the lecture and that they were available before the lecture on the web page.» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

19 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 10%
Very good»16 84%
I did not seek help»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.94

- Fast at answering emails, good explanations.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

19 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»8 42%
Very well»10 52%
I did not seek cooperation»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- Good with the teamwork!» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»15 83%
High»2 11%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

12. How was the total workload this study period?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 16%
Adequate»11 61%
High»4 22%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

Course specific questions

13. How did you experience the integration between the wireless and photonic parts during the course?

19 svarande

very poor integration»0 0%
poor integration»0 0%
reasonable integration»10 52%
good integration»7 36%
very good integration»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- They complement each other!» (very good integration)

14. Is there an added value of learning wireless and photonic system design in the same course, compared to studying them separately?

19 svarande

no added value at all»0 0%
only a bit of added value»1 5%
some added value»12 63%
quite a lot of added value»6 31%
very much added value»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

- I think separate them and encouraging student to chooose their own focus is better. For my own purpose, I just want to have expertise in wireless system design.» (only a bit of added value)
- I found it quite good to have both photonics and wireless in the same course, it really enlightens the crucial differences and the common aspects between photonics and wireless.» (some added value)
- It may be a little confusing aswell.» (some added value)
- Both parts can be used to build comunication system so you learn well what the similarities and differences are and it gives a whole impression how to build a communication system» (quite a lot of added value)

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

19 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 5%
Good»12 63%
Excellent»6 31%

Genomsnitt: 4.26

- thumbs up for the teachers in their courses» (Good)

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- team exercize»
- the teamworks !!»
- teamwork and good real system examples»
- The assignments are very useful for students" study.»
- 30 point exercise questions in team, open book exam and the lectures that is in Power point presentations =)»
- All the teachers were good and the hand-outs helped alot.»
- 1.Printed lecture notes which were given to students at beginning of class. 2.Teamworks »
- The numerous tutorials»
- Teachers, visiting lecturers, Simulink demos, hand outs, team work.»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- the exercices should be slightly more "alive", more interactive perhaps with the students.»
- add some system link simulation by software.»
- actually nothing! This is great»
- All the groups in the group assignment didn"t work that well, it was much that everyone do it by themselves and turn in one of those, some groups worked though.»
- I think, it should be some study time(e.g. 3-4days) between the last class and the first final exam. (take part in a class, just one day before the final exam is ridiculous) »
- Maybe more team works (very good to know if we are prepared for the exam, compare to the others classmates).»

18. Additional comments

- This course is good in my own views. Teachers are nice and outstanding in their majors. Wish it will have more real system examples and practical simulations.»
- exam was reasonably difficult and you could actually answer every bit all of the questions. I liked the style of the exam. »
- Maybe add a Simulink demo for the optical part, if it"s possible.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från