ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Program Verification, TDA565/DIT081

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-01-31 - 2008-02-08
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 41%
Kontaktperson: Wolfgang Ahrendt»
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Informationsteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 3 30%

Around 20 hours/week» 5 50%

Around 25 hours/week» 1 10%

Around 30 hours/week» 1 10%

At least 35 hours/week» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 2 20%

50%» 0 0%

75%» 7 70%

100%» 1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

- The course collided 2 times out of 3 each week with a mandatory course for the 3rd year students of Datateknik.» (25%)
- All lectueres except some exercise sessions» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

The learning outcomes for this course were defined as:

different techniques for writing precise specification of functional requirement of software units,
how to systematically search for errors in an implementation (by testing) and measure how good the search is,
how to reason about programs for guaranteeing correctness.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 1 10%

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 5 50%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 4 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- Student portal not up to date» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- The copy-paste from previous course made it a bit confusing/unclear.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 9 100%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Even though the theoretical information about debugging was interresting, it didn"t bring that much new information, since i guess most of the students were very familiar with debugging etc, and thus the debugging-part of the course might have been a bit more advanced.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 4 44%

Yes, definitely» 4 44%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- But it was more than difficult.It is said to us that the exam would be easier but it was quite difficult and lengthy. Question 2 took around 2 hours to solve so it was quite lengthy and boring kind of exam» (To some extent)
- The exam was to much long and the assignment were much more difficult than the exercices were during the classes» (To some extent)
- The type and level of questions seemed to me good, but the amount of them, regarding the time of 4 hours, was a bit high.» (Yes, definitely)
- I actually took the course at the same time that i was taking my "regular" courses and allways with the intention that Id prioritize those first, and as things turned out when the exam-period started I felt that I didn"t had time to do the exam in this course at this time.» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent have the lectures been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 1 10%

Large extent» 5 50%

Great extent» 4 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- I didnt attend many of them, but the slides were my primary source of information» (Large extent)
- lectures very interesting and helpful» (Great extent)

7. To what extent have the exercise classes been of help for the learning?

10 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 4 40%

Large extent» 6 60%

Great extent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- i didnt attend some of them» (Some extent)

8. To what extent have the lab assignments, and the feedback on hand-ins, been of help for the learning?

10 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 0 0%

Large extent» 5 50%

Great extent» 5 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- The best part of the course ,was the lab assignments and feedbacks,,which we were supposed to chabge them if it was neede,,acording the tutor guidelines » (Great extent)
- But the deadlines collided a bit with other courses, so I wasn"t satisfied at all about my contribution. It would have helped if it has been possible to publish the assignments earlier.» (Great extent)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 0 0%

Rather well» 6 60%

Very well» 4 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- But the copy-paste-based method from the old course caused some inaccurate information. But a great thing was to have the archive of the previous year, even though the course had changed.» (Rather well)

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

10 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 4 40%

Very good» 5 50%

I did not seek help» 1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

- teachers very acccessible» (Very good)

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 2 20%

Rather well» 1 10%

Very well» 5 50%

I did not seek cooperation» 2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

- at least with my lab partner» (Very well)

12. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 9 90%

High» 1 10%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

13. How was the total workload this study period?

10 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 3 30%

High» 7 70%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

- The workload of three courses was pretty high, especially since i had pretty bad time management.» (High)

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 2 20%

Good» 5 50%

Excellent» 3 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.1

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Wolfgang!»
- basicaly the all content of the course, but maybe spend some more time on the last part which was more complicated and has been kind of "skip"»
- labs,and tutor guideliens»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- -»
- Made the exam less long is assignments are weighty»
- As I stated earlier, it would be great if the workload in final exam be a bit more in harmony with the available time to students to answer them.»
- exercise setions should be more serious and improved»
- Course Name should be Software Verification and Validation.»
- Plan the course so that it doesnt collide with mandatory courses that most of the students are taking, that would cause much higher attendancerate.»

17. Additional comments

- This time the exam was quite boring and lengthy. The exam should test the actual contents. it would be so lengthy that in the end you get fed up of it. It should have motivating questions that surely checks your knowledge.»
- Very enjoyable course!»
- I"d like to thank you all instructors: (Prof. Hähnle, Dr. Ahrendt and also Fredrik Lindblad) for your patience and consideration.»
- Exam was bit more lengthy and difficult then the Lab and lecture examples.»
- The number of participants in the course was great, it created a very comfy environment on the lectures/exercises.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från