ENKÄTER

 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.


Dependable Computer Systems, Lp 1 Ht11, DAT270

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-10-10 - 2011-10-28
Antal svar: 29
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 16%
Kontaktperson: Åsa Samdell»


Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

29 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 13%
Around 20 hours/week»14 48%
Around 25 hours/week»8 27%
Around 30 hours/week»2 6%
At least 35 hours/week»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

29 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 6%
75%»11 37%
100%»16 55%

Genomsnitt: 4.48

- i had a collision with another course» (50%)
- Excellent lectures and lab help! The lectures got more ad hoc towards the end, all the diffrent concepts missed the red thread it is supposed to have. The thread was clearly visable in the beginning.» (100%)


Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

29 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»6 20%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 13%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»19 65%

Genomsnitt: 3.24

- I learnt a lot from this course, it has given my judgement one more dimension.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)
- In my thought the teacher described well the course goal and as well the whole team seems working togther to achive something and to the help student » (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

26 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»26 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- The math was kind of the same all of the course making it very easy. You should be able to put in harder problems in the lectures at least.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

26 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 15%
Yes, definitely»17 65%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»5 19%

Genomsnitt: 3.03

- Results are not posted yet therefore I cannot provide an answer.» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)


Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

29 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 6%
Large extent»15 51%
Great extent»12 41%

Genomsnitt: 3.34

- The lab was good. The report painful. The lectures, not very effective. » (Some extent)
- Really good!» (Great extent)
- The lecturer and the lab assistants are very professional and friendly.» (Great extent)
- Superior support provided by teacher and associate teacher. I wish the other courses offered the same service :) » (Great extent)
- Great lectures and exercises. Good job!» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

28 svarande

Small extent»2 7%
Some extent»10 35%
Large extent»11 39%
Great extent»5 17%

Genomsnitt: 2.67

- I bought the book but I"ve hardly opened it» (Small extent)
- I didn"t need to buy the book that is given at the beginning of the course. Books are TOO EXPENSIVE!» (Small extent)
- I rarely looked into the book. I usually read a lot from the course material but in this course I didn"t do that. The book didn"t feel exciting. » (Some extent)
- Did not use much of the extra material on the homepage. Good that it"s there though.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

29 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»7 24%
Very well»22 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- As usual no way to get updates to course home page through mail or RSS otherwise good.» (Rather well)
- Really good feedback on the labs! webpage is good as well as the slides.» (Very well)
- Homepage is simple and clear. and ugly. But that doesn"t matter after all the ping-pong hell we are going through in other courses.» (Very well)
- Clear and well structured with relevant updates» (Very well)
- nicely done and updated» (Very well)
- The teachers always update the course matterial and the website is well organized and easiy to use and to understand to find where the matterial is.» (Very well)
- Johan managed to find a larger lecture hall, and also to increase the maximum number of registered students so that I could register during the first two weeks. Awesome.» (Very well)


Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

29 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 3%
Rather good»3 10%
Very good»22 75%
I did not seek help»3 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.93

- Lots of oppertunites to do the labs is good, though a bigger labroom would be good.» (Very good)
- We got good and relevant help in the lab classes.» (Very good)
- Many lab teachers that were happy to help and answer questions :)» (Very good)
- The teachers and the whole assistant team are ready wehn we ask them any question and I like teh way they respond. Its realy with a good manner.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

29 svarande

Very poorly»1 3%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»7 24%
Very well»20 68%
I did not seek cooperation»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

11. How was the course workload?

29 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»17 58%
High»9 31%
Too high»3 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.51

- perfect!» (Adequate)
- I used a significant amount of time for the lab reports. Would like for the reports to weigh in on grade. It feels like a waste of time to spend several days writing a good report if it doesn"t give any credits, points for the exam, or similar.» (Adequate)
- The two reports are very long to complete. maybe only one could be nice to hand in. (the 1st one = the more important)» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

29 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 3%
Adequate»16 55%
High»9 31%
Too high»3 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.48

- three courses, so quite difficult.» (Too high)


Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

29 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 3%
Adequate»1 3%
Good»14 48%
Excellent»13 44%

Genomsnitt: 4.34

- Okey, the course is not horrible. But I am highly skeptical to teaching carried out in this way. Most students sleep through the lectures, and that is because it is so painfully boring. The material is "flat". Everything is equally important and we don"t ever dig deeper, everything is one the same level. The course should change perspective. Let the students do something, build on what is though on the lectures. More labs, or group projects. I learned most from talking in groups, trying to come up with things together. And really, that is not very advance pedagogic, we learn more if we are engaged. Now it is like we watch tv for 40 hours, of course we learn something but we could learn so much more.» (Fair)
- putting in the exam question such as the taxonomy, to me it is more about memorizing rather than understanding» (Adequate)
- Good lectures» (Good)
- The first lab was a great way to practice report writing. Excellent course overall!» (Excellent)
- good lecturer even though he has been in CCC :). » (Excellent)
- Teacher is excellent, and has perfect English elocution. » (Excellent)
- I wish if i can express the general impression more than excellent becouse the whole team deserve more than that. » (Excellent)
- Very interesting topic. Good teachers. Good guest lectures. One of the best courses I have taken.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The labs»
- The case studies are interesting. Maybe we could build on them more. In groups make our own ariane-5 model?»
- The content and lab should be reserved.»
- Guest lectures»
- The whole course as it is organized is very good, especially the guest lectures.»
- The visiting lecturers was a great addtion.»
- Everything. The course organization was perfect, from labs to exercises and lectures.»
- The guest speaker and one lab session.»
- I was very satisfied with the course»
- prepare the prelecture and postlecture questions»
- website, guest lectures»
- For next time hope it will be nice if they continue like this and i want to advice them to keep the good work.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Think about how the math part could be broader. The last lectures should be put in a larger concept which seemd to be missing this time around.»
- Not only lectures that are mostly reading from slides. The teacher rarely says anything that isn"t on the slides. It turns out quite sleepy then.»
- The part of exercise should be changed. Students should focus on some typical problems instead of being given answers to lots of problems»
- More emphasis on excercises with petri nets.»
- Nothing.»
- Nothing»
- Cut down the study material, introduce more quest speakers and even cut down the second lab. A review session is also helpful before the exams, in fact we should have at least 2-3 classes for review before the exams.»
- sharpe tool available on GNU/Linux labs too.»
- Exercise sessions»
- nothing»
- instead of two lab assignments if there was just one assignment, we would have more time to study and get ready for exam so I recommend to decrease the number of lab assignments to 1.»
- only one report to hand in?»
- Nothing just continue the good work.»
- Give some sort of credit or bonus for good reports, or reduce the minimum number of words.»

16. Additional comments

- Good work!»
- If students are sleeping, something is wrong. Most of us want to learn, so it is too bad when that potential isn"t used. »
- I don"t know the field, but maybe it could be possible to do or show some "real" examples of the software redundancy concepts (actual code).»
-
- The course presentation was perfect, we had enough lab assistants, teaching assistants and enough class exercises. I just wish the computer networks course should adapt this practice next year.»
- I want to thank thw whole team the Professoo the the lab and the excercice assistant team and please pass my respect for them and I saw diffrent kinds of teacher in my life time but they are the best and in my ranking list they are number one.»
- The first two questions from the exam were too difficult, considering the fact that we NEVER did "markovs" like that in the exercise lectures. There were always much simpler ones. So this is not right. If you put that on the exam, it is fair to do that kind of exercise in class as well.»


Kursutvärderingssystem från