|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Fault-tolerant Computer Systems, Lp 1 Ht11, EDA122/DIT061Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2011-10-10 - 2011-10-28 Antal svar: 33 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 10% Kontaktperson: Åsa Samdell»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.21 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.48 - didnt attend the exercise sessions» (75%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.27 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.31 - Regarding GSPN, only the half of one lecture session was allocated to provide the students with its basic concepts and a few exercise problems were solved by the course TA. However in the exam a 12-point question was asked dealing with GSPN and developing an extended reachability graph. In my opinion the amount of dedicated time and the exam question points are not balanced. » (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.18 - Great professor and TA.» (Great extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?32 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.84 - Large portions (such as markov chains) are missing in the book.» (Some extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.63 - Do. Not. Password. Protect. I understand some material should be protected, but please keep as little as possible protected. Browsing the site w/ a mobile phone for example is very difficult.» (Very badly) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.9 - I didn"t ask that many questions and when I did, it was during the exercise sessions during the pauses. The answers were good and to the point, however the teacher seemed to be stressed (which was of course understandable).
Probably there should be time dedicated to questions only when one can meet with the teacher.» (Rather good) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?32 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.62 - Setting up two random persons to work together is in general a really bad idea. » (Very poorly) 11. How was the course workload?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.15 12. How was the total workload this study period?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.27 Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.12 - As a single parent, the compulsory laboratory sessions in the evenigs has been really difficult to attend. Also, labs should be done individually, or not be examinating, as you can"t know who has done what.» (Fair) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Lab sessions»- The guest lectures.» - the teacher. he has a good teaching skill.» - Labs» - Johan.» - The guest lecture delivered by industry experts.» - whole set up is quite necessary.» - Guest Lectures!» - Lectures Exercises sessions Slides/lecture notes Solved exams/exercises » - The labs, the lectures, the exercises, the course material on the course home page.» - - Labs were interesting. - Exercises were helpful. - Guest lectures» - The update of lecture slides are very quick, that"s good. Very convenient to get help during the lab section, that should keep.» - everything we had this year » - Exercise sessions, lecture notes handed beforehand» - Exercise sessions Lab sessions Guest lecture from SP company» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- It is better to reduce the number of lectures»- The password protections. Also please explain the maths more.» - project: it was boring, and little in term of time.» - My only suggestion is allocating more time to solve the problems regarding GSPN.» - not much» - NOthin...» - (1) Homepage should be easier to navigate (2) Maybe some separate time for personal consultation » - Nothing significant that I can think of.» - - maybe a little bit less reading for the exam - the reading instructions could be clearer. I think most people are interested in the amount of reading that is important for the exam. By looking at the old exams I had the feeling that sometimes casual reading was more than enough and sometimes careful reading was required to be able to answer the exam questions.» - Nothing.» - nothing» - It would be great if there is a short presentation for how to register for group and book the labs.» - Day time means < 5pm. Lab reports should be done individually.» - number of students! there were many people in class» 16. Additional comments- I"m surprised how many ignorant questions student can ask. Very many question are of the kind "will this be on this exam. do I need to know exactly this fact". Takes a lot of time from the lecture. Also, students tend to ask "stupid" questions about things they would know if they listened 10mins before. Feels like many students skip to listen, waits for a sum-up where the teacher tells them exactly what they should write on the exam... (Btw, there is only one safety-switch on my microwave owen... (SP))»- Nice course, well done!» - I like this course a lot!» - About the descriptive problems, there was some miss understandings about the descriptions due to lack of english, and that was both was both ways. Both from student, and teachers. I think thats because neither are natives. on top of that, you need to master a language and be a good writer to precise description witch will not have any second, shadow meaning. So maybe some help with that for next year.» - Negin deserves credit for putting up with a large class with many questions during the exercises. Sometimes there were too many questions asked which can be hard to limit. One idea would be to schedule an hour or two per week for students who have several individual questions. Otherwise it worked very good.» - I really liked the course. Especially the analysis of reliability, availability and safety.» - I didn"t quite get the hardware standards part, maybe can give more example on that.» - Course is really good. Prof Johan lectures were very Good. TA Negin helped a lot in solving problems.»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21%