ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Network information theory, H11

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-10-13 - 2011-10-26
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 50%
Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

8 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»6 75%
Around 20 hours/week»1 12%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 1.62

- I think the problem was that the students did not prepare themselves before the sections. Therefore, it was slow and boring becusae the teacher had to explain every detail.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- Reading the material before the class helps to some extent, but then, one ends up spending more time in trying to understand how the next step in the proof is achieved. As the "Lecture Notes/book" used in this course is very crisp. Hence, one ends up spending more time. On the contrary, going to the class and then reading the Gammal"s lecture notes/slides, makes learning easier.» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

8 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 12%
75%»2 25%
100%»5 62%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

8 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 12%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 37%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»0 0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»7 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

- I wonder, why do we have this portal/this question with such an option, when the exam is not yet taken. I always prefer to take such evaluation after the exam.» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»4 50%
Great extent»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 42%
Large extent»3 42%
Great extent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

- The course material is heavy, when there read without the help of the teacher.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

8 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 37%
Very well»5 62%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»8 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

8 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»5 62%
Very well»2 25%
I did not seek cooperation»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

11. How was the course workload?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 12%
Adequate»6 75%
High»1 12%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The content to read was quite high compared to what was covered in class.» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

12. What is your general impression of the course?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»4 50%
Excellent»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

13. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- text, lecturer»
- The proof of theorems on the whiteboard.»
- The lectures given by the instructor is very helpful for understanding the lecture notes.»
- Teacher»
- The way (a combination of ppt slides and whiteboard writing) in which the lectures were given is very good.»

14. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- course syllabus»
- Maybe use a book instead of lecture note next year.»
- If the recommended book is available,it would be better than just reading the lecture notes.»
- Some lectures were given in a faster pace than it should have been. Maybe twice 2-hour-lecture per week is needed. More interactions with students might be better.»
- A preprint or a book would be helpful in understanding the various ideas in the lecture notes. As the entropy of the lecture notes is quite high. The course was a bit slow at times and a bit fast. It might be good to go fast in the beginning and then slow down towards the end. This might require students to put more effort in the beginning and hence, it gives the students to get ready whenever the teacher likes to go fast. Early morning lectures would be good, instead of the lazy afternoon classes.»

15. Additional comments

- I think the problem was that the students did not prepare themselves before the sections. Therefore, it was slow and boring becusae the teacher had to explain every detail.»
- Thanks very much for the course.»
- I enjoyed this course very much.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från