ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Preliminary Plant Design 2011, KBT156

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-10-17 - 2011-10-31
Antal svar: 12
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 41%
Kontaktperson: Gunnar Eriksson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

1. What type of student are you?

12 svarande

Master student» 10 83%

Exchange student» 2 16%

Other» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.16

2. If you are a Master student - are you?

10 svarande

Swedish» 9 90%

International» 1 10%

Genomsnitt: 1.1 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 1.1

Your own effort

3. How many hours per week did you spend on this course? We mean total time, i.e. in and out of class. Estimate an average over the entire study period.

12 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 2 16%

Around 20 hours/week» 4 33%

Around 25 hours/week» 2 16%

Around 30 hours/week» 3 25%

At least 35 hours/week» 1 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.75 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

4. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

12 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 0 0%

75%» 2 16%

100%» 10 83%

Genomsnitt: 4.83 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

5. Were the course goals reasonable considering your background?

12 svarande

No, the goals were set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seemed reasonable» 12 100%

No, the goals were set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

6. Did the assignments, project and comprehension test assess whether you reached the goals?

12 svarande

No, not at all.» 0 0%

To some extent» 5 41%

Yes, definitely» 7 58%

No opinion» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.58 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I think the exam had to much open questions. This because i newer know how much to write. More direct questions with a,b,c,d,e questions is better in my opinion. » (To some extent)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.38

Teaching and course administration

7. How was the subject coverage of the lectures?

12 svarande

They covered too little material» 0 0%

About right» 9 75%

They covered somewhat too much material» 2 16%

They covered too much material» 1 8%

Don"t know/did not attend» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- This is a very wide course and sometimes it loses focus» (About right)

8. To what extent did the lectures help your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

To some extent» 6 50%

Large extent» 6 50%

Great extent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

9. Overall how would you rate the quality of the lectures?

12 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 1 8%

Adequate» 4 33%

Good» 5 41%

Excellent» 2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- rather booring, but the project time were good.» (Adequate)
- The lecture focused on the learning of HYSYS was a bit poor, one or two extra teachers would really have been beneficial because one was not enough to go around and help everybody» (Adequate)

10. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent» 5 41%

To some extent» 2 16%

Large extent» 3 25%

Great extent» 2 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.16 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Would be good if a reading list would be presented at the start of the course» (Small extent)
- The book was almost not used at all» (Large extent)

11. Did the course literature and handout material adequately cover the course content?

12 svarande

No, it was inadequate.» 0 0%

Yes, it was adequate.» 12 100%

No opinion» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

12 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 0 0%

Rather well» 10 83%

Vey well» 2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.16 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- the new student portal didn"t work as i should, used the old one. » (Rather well)
- All material was not on the web page (especially reactor handouts). Guidelines for report should have been there earlier. » (Rather well)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.63

Course Project

13. What was your general impression of the course project?

12 svarande

Very Negative» 0 0%

Mostly Negative» 0 0%

Mostly Positive» 10 83%

Very Positive» 2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.16 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Would be even better if all things were given from the start so you weren"t as hold back as you were now.» (Mostly Positive)
- A good project but there was too little introduction to the different parts» (Mostly Positive)
- But the seminartask combined with the acre project seemed much harder than some of the other tasks.» (Mostly Positive)

14. Did the course project contribute to your understanding of the different aspects involved in the preliminary design of a plant?

12 svarande

No, not at all.» 0 0%

A small contribution.» 2 16%

A large contribution.» 4 33%

A very large contribution, ie much better than lectures etc.» 6 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

15. How well did collaboration work within your project group?

12 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Reasonably well» 3 25%

Very well» 9 75%

No opinion» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

16. Was the objective for your project clearly defined?

12 svarande

No, not at all» 2 16%

Yes, it was adequate» 10 83%

Genomsnitt: 1.83 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Too little information from the start. Didn"t like that information was handed out during each new lecture» (No, not at all)
- But some lack of information about how to achieve the objective» (Yes, it was adequate)

17. How was the quality of instruction and help that you recieved for the project?

12 svarande

It was very poor» 0 0%

It was poor» 1 8%

It was good» 6 50%

It was very good» 5 41%

Genomsnitt: 3.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- For me the instructions were not always clearly defined, especially on the energy part. Giving schemes on the blackboard and a few details in not enough for me (a clear handout with everything on it would be better) and most of the time quite a lot of details are missing, and the teachers are not that available regarding the number of groups to help us.» (It was poor)
- I think it was strange that what needed to be done during a particular session was not available before the session. Sometimes good guidelines of what to do were being handed out after we had completed them, that really boggled my mind.» (It was good)
- Mostly very good help but sometimes I felt lost» (It was good)
- The teachers that helped in the project were excellent! » (It was very good)
- you were kinda dependent of it thou...» (It was very good)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.88

Study Climate

18. In the course how were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

12 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 2 16%

Very good» 9 75%

I did not seek help» 1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.91 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Ok for the lectures, could have been better in the project» (Rather good)
- It was very good that you could send a email and book a time with eg Matteo when you were stuck» (Very good)

19. How was the course workload?

12 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 1 8%

Adequate» 3 25%

High» 6 50%

Too high» 2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.75 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- All time was spent on the project, not much time to study for exam or read the course litterature.» (Too high)

20. How was the total workload this study period?

12 svarande

Too low» 1 8%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 3 25%

High» 3 25%

Too high» 5 41%

Genomsnitt: 3.91 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- studied 150%» (Too high)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.86

Summarizing Questions

21. What is your general impression of the course?

12 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Poor» 0 0%

Adequate» 1 8%

Good» 8 66%

Excellent» 3 25%

Genomsnitt: 4.16 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

22. Do you think the course should cover more or fewer topics?

12 svarande

More» 1 8%

Reasonable as it is» 8 66%

Fewer» 3 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.16 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Try to get a better focus?» (Fewer)
- fewer with more depth» (Fewer)

23. What should definitely be preserved next year?

- Hysis calculations.»
- The project»
- The project but with the changes i mentioned above»
- I think the course must be as it is now, the lectures are really adequate and the project is really interesting, perhaps having a deeper lecture about sustainable development that there is also important for preliminary plant design.»
- The project»
- The lectures as they are (they cover basically all the main subjects related to chemical engineering and plant design), the project»

24. What should definitely be changed next year?

- More about plant layout.»
- The course book could be better»
- More should be included since the workload is really low»
- I think 16 hours per week are too much for the course you should find the way to reduce the number of hours because sometimes you really do not have the time to be during the total hours all the week.»
- More information about how to use HYSYS»
- The seminartask with the different catalyst. »
- Make the instructions at the beginning of each project sessions a bit clearer, with a more detailed handout, and maybe add a teacher per session to help. Maybe indicate a bit more precisely what is really important to remember in the lecture material.»
- Dela ut guidelines till projekt rapporten tidigare under projektet. Som det blev nu var det väldigt stressigt att få ihop rapporten i lv1 i läsperiod 2 istället för att skriva kontinuerligt under projektet.»

25. Additional comments:

- I really liked the course, I think is some of the best that I have taken. I just have a comment about the final examination. It is too difficult for people who are not form Sweden or Europe to answer questions about siting a plant in the north of Sweden or the North of Finalnd because we ignore many details and the probabilities to not get the desired answer is to high, so I suggest to change that kind of questions.»
- A very good course and I learned a lot!»
- The exam was unequally built: some things were quite easy and really close to the lecture notes, and others were really tricky. There is a lot of reading material to cover, and it is difficult to know on what the exam could be.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.16

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.98
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.62

Kursutvärderingssystem från