ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Course evaluation MSCP, TEK175

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-01-21 - 2008-02-05
Antal svar: 42
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 64%
Kontaktperson: Patrik Jonsson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

42 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 4 9%

Around 20 hours/week» 11 26%

Around 25 hours/week» 11 26%

Around 30 hours/week» 12 28%

At least 35 hours/week» 4 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.02

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

42 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 2 4%

50%» 2 4%

75%» 15 35%

100%» 23 54%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

42 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 1 2%

The goals are difficult to understand» 1 2%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 22 52%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 18 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

4. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

42 svarande

No, not at all» 2 4%

To some extent» 21 50%

Yes, definitely» 17 40%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 2 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.45

- The focus on the exam was very different from lectures. » (No, not at all)
- Since goals were not so clear to me I will not choose "Yes, definitely".» (To some extent)
- The examination should be more aligned to what is taught in the sessions.» (To some extent)
- Didn"t take the exam due to too high work load (150%) waiting for the re-exam» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Course structure and content

5. To what extent has the lectures been of help for your learning?

42 svarande

Small extent» 4 9%

Some extent» 13 30%

Large extent» 23 54%

Great extent» 2 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.54

- I am not sure but I got the feeling that the slides on the homepage were not the whole slides we had in the lecture. This means if somebody miss one lecture it will be not that easy to get the slides. This decrease the motivation a bit.» (Some extent)
- Especially seminars with Stig-Arne because we had to prepare for it and then check our knowledge in a really good way.» (Large extent)

6. To what extent has the guest lectures (IKEA, Nobel Biocare, Volvo CE, Optilon) been of help for your learning?

42 svarande

Small extent» 5 11%

Some extent» 23 54%

Large extent» 12 28%

Great extent» 2 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.26

- Only attended few of the guest lectures.» (Small extent)
- Didn"t have time to attend...» (Some extent)
- Optilon was the best.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the Jonsson & Mattsson book been of help for your learning?

42 svarande

Small extent» 3 7%

Some extent» 8 19%

Large extent» 19 45%

Great extent» 12 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.95

- Terrible english and a very confusing book!» (Small extent)
- There are errors in the exercises and would be good with an index in the end» (Large extent)
- It is a great book. However it was difficult to decide which information are the most important, and have to be studied more carefully for the exam.» (Large extent)

8. To what extent has the articles been of help for your learning?

42 svarande

Small extent» 18 42%

Some extent» 21 50%

Large extent» 3 7%

Great extent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.64

- didn" read much of the articles actually» (Small extent)

9. To what extent has the Lawson M3 SCP laboratory been of help for your learning?

42 svarande

Small extent» 6 14%

Some extent» 21 50%

Large extent» 12 28%

Great extent» 3 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

- There is connection between course content and this laboratory, but it was not that important. It could be a bit later when we know more about that we are doing.» (Some extent)

10. To what extent has the Lean Production Game been of help for your learning?

41 svarande

Small extent» 1 2%

Some extent» 11 26%

Large extent» 21 51%

Great extent» 8 19%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

- Interesting and fun game!» (Large extent)
- It was a great fun! In addition it helped me to memorize how kan-ban, smaller batches, etc. affect the SC.» (Large extent)
- It"s good to not just read about lean. I myself get a better understanding when visually seeing it too.» (Large extent)
- This kind of game helped allways a lot because it is possible to make own changes and see the result directly. This is great!» (Large extent)

11. To what extent has the BCG case competition been of help for your learning?

42 svarande

Small extent» 16 38%

Some extent» 16 38%

Large extent» 5 11%

Great extent» 5 11%

Genomsnitt: 1.97

- Remove from course and let only those that consider this of particular interest participate.» (Small extent)
- I would have preferred a case where we could use more information from lectures and the books. And I don"t think it is good to have compulsory competitions. I don"t understand why this assignment was so close to the exams, it would have been better if it was in the first weeks.» (Small extent)
- It didn"t help me at all. I think that I wasted too much time solving the case. Better feedback after the whole thing would be nice.» (Small extent)
- Didn"t help me anything in this cource but it was a good experience.» (Small extent)
- Not connected to the course» (Some extent)
- Felt like the case had nothing to do with the course» (Some extent)
- The BSG case gave great learning in how the real world looks like. That it is key to be able to not just have a good solution but be able to sell it. But I do not think that this case had so much to do with the course, and shouldn"t be included in this course.» (Some extent)
- I think the topic was not that close to our course goals. The motivation was very high because it was something special.» (Some extent)
- Not directly for my learning on the course content, but more of empirical learning.» (Great extent)

12. To what extent have the two planning seminars ("What is wrong with using MRP?" and "Can and should we schedule to finite capacity?") been of help for your learning?

42 svarande

Small extent» 2 4%

Some extent» 8 19%

Large extent» 16 38%

Great extent» 16 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

- Could have the seminars earlier in the course so that we don´,t have to have so many seminars and deadlines in the end of the course. had no time for studing for the exam» (Large extent)
- It is good to get other people views on things and it is a good way to learn, when discussing the questions.» (Large extent)
- Tyckte om upplägget med mer diskussion och mindre redovisning från grupperna. » (Great extent)
- very good seminars!» (Great extent)
- This way of studying is the best possible. First, you need to prepare the report and slides for the presentation. Second you have to be prepared for discussion. Third Stig-Arne was trying to force use to look at the problem from different perspectives. » (Great extent)
- Perfect!» (Great extent)
- There was a good discussion during those lectures which gave good insight on the subject.» (Great extent)
- Excellent way of learning. It"s a shame it takes such a huge amount of time for the seminar leader.» (Great extent)

13. How did you perceive the mix between lectures, guest lectures, assignments, seminars, own literature studies, etc.?

- good mix, but should be spread differently in time»
- I thought it was very good»
- Di not attend many of them each, so can´,t directly say.»
- Good mix.»
- it was good»
- Very good with both seminars and lectures. Good mix!»
- too high worload»
- Good»
- good but could be better placed during the whole period»
- I believe it is balanced somehow good. But still it was in some extent diffifult to get whole picture on what the course is trying to give us»
- Good mix!»
- Good»
- Good. »
- It was a good mix, which made it more interesting to learn.»
- It is good mixing the lectures with seminars.»
- I think the mix was rather well-balanced. There was fair amount of guest lectures giving good insight to the industry, seminars were useful. Lectures covered the main aspects of studies leaving more detailed picture to be gained from the literature.»
- Good»
- It was quite a good mix, but the two planning seminars should have been scheduled earlier in the course.»
- good»
- I believe it was a good mix between them, however, I mainly did not gain anything special during the normal lectures. I would have preferred to have more discussion sessions like the MRP and finite capacity planning, because those ideas which were explained in the lectures are easily accessible through reading the books. »
- It was a nice mix, but Lawson M3 could be skipped or postponed. BCG could be skipped as well or brought forward to week 2 or 3.»
- quite good»
- Very very limited time for studying the litrature, especially before the exam!»
- A good micture.»
- It"s good with a mix, doesn"t get boring and it"s good that we have to be active and just not sit and listen. Though, i still think that the BSG case doesn"t really fit this course.»
- It was a good mix and well balanced»
- If I remeber right we had a bit to many articles. This was a 7,5 credit course and the time I had to spend was much more than the half of the 15 credit in the quarter before. Moreover I think the course in the quarter before consumed still much time.»
- Bra balans»

Course administration

14. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

42 svarande

Very badly» 3 7%

Rather badly» 2 4%

Rather well» 22 52%

Very well» 15 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- Bad, misspelled handouts, wrong in both handouts and in answer sheets» (Very badly)
- "Rather" because handouts were not that helpful while preparing for the exam.» (Rather well)
- It would be nice to have all slides on the homepage before the lecture starts. Moreover it would be nice to have the results from other groups on the homepage (if allowed) especially for the case. That would give the possibility to see other ideas.» (Rather well)
- Still waiting for re-exam date though...» (Very well)
- Use the web page as much as possible, since it is almost always reachable.» (Very well)

Study climate

15. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

42 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 14 33%

Very good» 21 50%

I did not seek help» 7 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

16. How was the course workload (i.e. only consider the MSCP course and not Freight Transport!)?

42 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 24 57%

High» 17 40%

Too high» 1 2%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

17. How was the total workload this study period (i.e. for the courses Freight transport + MSCP together)?

42 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 16 38%

High» 23 54%

Too high» 3 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.69

Summarising questions

18. What is your general impression of the course?

42 svarande

Poor» 1 2%

Fair» 5 11%

Adequate» 7 16%

Good» 26 61%

Excellent» 3 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.59

- I had practically no previous knowledge of production planning. The course managed to give me rather good overview in this area.» (Good)
- I like it. I think it is good that it is obligatory for SCM students.» (Good)
- But can be better.» (Good)
- Det var ganska hög belastning men inte mer än man lkan vänta sig på en master.» (Excellent)

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- MRP and lean production»
- The lean production game»
- BCG case.»
- The seminars: "What is wrong with using MRP?" and "Can and should we schedule to finite capacity?"»
- Keep the mix with lectures and seminars.»
- Not include BCG case since it wasn´,t related to the course.»
- Guest Lectures»
- The Litterature and seminars»
- The bcg case, Stig-Arne"s seminaries»
- The competition, the seminars, the book. »
- The lean production game»
- The BCG case was interesting to attend! The seminars was overall good!»
- The BCG case»
- Guest lectures, seminars. Case study was very useful.»
- The Lean production game and the Lawson laboratory, as well as the two planning seminars were really good. »
- MRP and finite capacity seminars»
- - The discussion sessions. - The Lawson Movex Lab - The Book»
- Lectures, Stig-Arne seminars, Lean game and the Books.»
- The two planning seminars.»
- the mix of lectures and seminars etc»
- The Seminars»
- All seminars and the case.»
- "Planning seminars" var tokigt bra båda två. Ha gärna kvar dem och gör fler om ni orkar :)»

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- dead-lines should be more spreaded, MRP and lean production seminars schould be earlier.»
- Correct the exercises on the homepage at least after the Exercise-lesson.»
- all errors in the excercises from the textbook»
- Add some good articles.»
- the last minute seminars»
- Maybe place the case competition outside the course»
- Book content»
- Maybe some of the guest lectures. But cannot say definitely which one.»
- better plan the seminars about MRP and guest lectures. they were very interested but having them at the end doesn"t works because everyone is more interested in reading that attending. The book is very clear but a little bit difficult to read, maybe it"s because it"s a direct translation from swedish to english. It would be nice that it is revised before seeling it, rather that receiving a big bunch of erratas list»
- There was a lot of literature considering both the courses and some of the articles didn"t give soo much.»
- The book! Same focus on exam and lectures!»
- Remove the BCG case»
- Perhaps get handouts to the guestlectures, i hardly remember anything of them now. Decrease number of pages for the two courses.»
- More relevant articles»
- No necessary changes. »
- It would have been good with some more guidance to the litterature. It seemed like everything was equally important, but in the end it wasn"t. It was too much to read in such a short time, and together with all the seminar the workload got quite high during some of the weeks.»
- no compulsory BCG competition. »
- - Number of discussion sessions should be increased - Amount of lectures which only describe the book should be decreased and let students read themselves. Instead, you can provide more extra examples and related miscellaneous information during the normal lectures. - Number of guest lectures whould be decreased or made in some ways more course objective-oriented.»
- BCG game - earlier or skipped.»
- Time to study.»
- Making the BCG case optional.»
- BCG case, take it away...it made the workload so much more heavier as a whole weekend plus two more days had to be spent on that»
- The date of the seminars could be moved to an earlier date.»
- The ideas regarding the web page (see before) and a topic during the case which is stronger conected to the course topic would be interesting.»
- Mindre tid till BCG (tvs tex tisdag till torsdag istället för fredag till tisdag. Hade kanske varit en bättre övning under mer tidspress och dessutom närmare finalomständigheterna för vinnande gruppen. Fårstår att det är lurigt att idministrera med jury etc men om alternativet finns så.»

21. Additional comments

- Boston case should be optional.»
- extremely bad not to read through the final exam before it was released (Thinking about the first question in particular)»
- the picture descirbing the course and how different functions are connected, should have been explained much better and more comprehendable from the start. badly structured exam i.e. the mistake in uestion one and many of the others were on a very detailed level rather than a conceptual.»
- Bad that the first quaestion in the exam had errors.»
- Linnea needs to improve the way she gives classes. also, you have a whole quarter to prepare and revise exams and formula sheet and still make mistakes!!! We are human, but if you know you have one mistake at least appear early on the exam to clarify. Lots of students loose too much time on it.»
- The lectures could go deeper into the subject since it was a difficult course and some parts, e.g. the connections between the different areas, needed more explanation to be understood. »
- I learned a lot! You made a great effort! Thank you!»
- Thank you for nice course! :)»
- Good work!!!»
- none»
- Gött mos»

Kursutvärderingssystem från