ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Ecology for Engineers, KKM022

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-10-19 - 2011-11-05
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 63%
Kontaktperson: Ulrika Palme»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 28%
Around 20 hours/week»5 71%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.71

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 33%
100%»4 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.66

- 85%» (?)

3. Did you read the course syllabus, including the learning objectives?

7 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Briefly»0 0%
Carefully»7 100%

Genomsnitt: 3

- It was easy to understand.» (Carefully)

4. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 28%
Yes, definitely»5 71%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

5. What priority did you give this course?

What priority did you give this course compared to other courses you studied during quarter 1 (or compared to your "average" priority of courses if this was the only course you took)

7 svarande

Much higher»0 0%
Higher»3 42%
Equal to other courses»3 42%
Lower»1 14%
Much lower»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent have the lectures been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»4 57%
Great extent»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

7. To what extent have the projects and exercises been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»5 71%
Great extent»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- The last project could have been defined more clearly. » (Large extent)
- I enjoyed a lot doing the projects, and learned also a lot.» (Great extent)

8. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 14%
Large extent»5 71%
Great extent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3

9. To what extent was the course home page of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»1 14%
Some extent»2 28%
Large extent»3 42%
Great extent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- A bit confusing the system in general better if you could see clearly what is new and what of the literature is realy importent for the cours and what is only additional material» (Small extent)

10. How would you describe the organization of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Ok»0 0%
Well functioning»6 85%
Very well functioning»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- Tell the IT administration to fix the uploading feature... This is 2011..» (Well functioning)
- Ulrika, you did greate when the guest lecturers did not arrive, thank you!» (Very well functioning)

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»7 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 14%
Very well»6 85%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

13. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 100%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

14. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 42%
High»4 57%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

More detailed questions on the course

15. How would you describe the level of the course?

7 svarande

Too difficult»0 0%
Adequate»7 100%
Too easy»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- IT was a good level for me who has not had any ecology courses before this.» (Adequate)
- Some things were well-known from before, but others new. It was also good that extra-material was offered if you were interested. » (Adequate)

16. Will this course be useful for you in your life as a professional?

7 svarande

Yes»7 100%
NO»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- Maybe... but the knowledge is useful anywhere, anytime.» (Yes)

17. What is your opinion on the course structure with many small projects?

7 svarande

Very good»3 42%
Good»4 57%
Rather bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.57

- Not only were the tasks instructive, it was also good to practise presentations in frot of class.» (Very good)
- It was very good that the projects weren´,t mandatory but gave points so that you could decide on your own whether you had time to make one certain project or not. To have influence on your own work and to make your own prioritations improves the "working climate".» (Very good)
- A good mean to learn the topics.» (Good)
- It is good so you learn more about different topics and it good to practice to present something» (Good)

18. Was the work load for the projects reflected in the points given?

7 svarande

Yes»7 100%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- some projects should have more points.» (Yes)
- But the last project was more workintensive than the others» (Yes)

19. Were the projects relevant for the course?

7 svarande

Yes»7 100%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- Very much related and relevant.» (Yes)

20. Was the Eco-test a good way to check preknowledge?

7 svarande

Yes»4 57%
No»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 1.42

- There where some questions that can not be consider preknowledge.» (No)
- Some questions have been good but questions about what a certain person has said and what he means with this are not realy preknowledge and it was not realy talked about this person in the course later» (No)

21. Were the field trips relevant for the course?

7 svarande

Yes»7 100%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- Espesially the one to the forrest, and the farm visit were very much appreciated.» (Yes)
- very enjoyable» (Yes)
- Both where good, and the level of the guides where very high! » (Yes)
- They have been realy interesting » (Yes)

What is your opinion on the lectureres?

22. Ulrika

Please give you comments also in text, especially regarding ability to create interest for his/her topic and structure of lectures.

7 svarande

Very good»6 85%
Good»1 14%
Not so good»0 0%
Bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.14

- Very good in creating interest, and good structures of lectures. She is also a hero for comming to class and lecture with a cold. » (Very good)
- It was clear that she really like ecology. It is always good for a teacher to be very good in english.She was also good at summarize discussions. » (Very good)
- The lecturer had really an interest in the topics. The quality of the lectures varied a little, probably reflecting time spent for preparation. (Two guest lecturers falling ill the same week is of course a challenge that could harldy be solved.)» (Very good)
- realy stands behind this topic» (Good)

23. Linus

Please give you comments also in text, especially regarding ability to create interest for his/her topic and structure of lectures.

7 svarande

Very good»4 57%
Good»2 28%
Not so good»1 14%
Bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.57

- Also good at english but also very skilled in ecology. » (Very good)
- The information about the projects (first lecture or something) could have been better prepared.» (Good)

24. Guest lecturer Ida Hellmark

Please give you comments also in text, especially regarding ability to create interest for his/her topic and structure of lectures.

7 svarande

Very good»4 57%
Good»3 42%
Not so good»0 0%
Bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.42

- It is always good to have guest lecturers to broaden the influences for us.» (Very good)

25. Forest guide Johan Åberg

7 svarande

Very good»5 71%
Good»2 28%
Not so good»0 0%
Bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.28

- This visit was very interesting. Nice group tasks in the forest. » (Very good)

Summarizing questions

26. What is your general impression of the course? Grade from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent)

7 svarande

1 - Poor»0 0%
2 - Fair»0 0%
3 - Adequate»0 0%
4 - Good»4 57%
5 - Excellent»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.42

- As I said earlier, the level of the course was very good for me who don"t has ecological background. » (5 - Excellent)
- Very interesting topics. Fantastic to be such a small group of people. That really gave you an opportunity to ask questions, having discussions and get to know the other students. It was also nice to have a course not being exactly as an "average" Chalmers course. The debate was really fun.» (5 - Excellent)

27. Do you think that the examination form with the bonus system in this course is good?

7 svarande

No, this should be changed»0 0%
It can be improved»1 14%
The system is OK»2 28%
The system is excellent»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.42 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It is good to get a teaser to study from the beginning in the course. » (The system is OK)
- Participation for a deep understanding requires attendance, why the system is excellent.» (The system is excellent)
- It is really good not having a lot of mandatory things and instead give bonus points. This gives the students ability to make their own prioritations and the feeling that they can influence their own work-load. You could decide on your own whether to participate in the bonus giving activities depending on the work-load and planning in the rest of your life. » (The system is excellent)
- it is good because the most work is done during the cours with the projects and so on and this way it is rewarded.» (The system is excellent)

28. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Visit to Forrest, the lecturers, projects and presentation.»
- field trips and guest lecturers»
- The combination of guest lecturers, projects and study visits. Maybe another visit of some kind. »
- Most of the things I think. The excursions, the debate, the small projects.»
- The field trips and the bonus system,more small projects instead of one big project»

29. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More students, this course concerns an important subject that more should have a deeper knowlege in.»
- some questions in the ecotest, like the tragedy of the commons.»
- Hope that the guest lecturers don"t get sick...:) »
- Hopefully, the guest lecturers will be more healthy next year. The guidance on the farm could be more in english perhaps instead of the swedish-english-mix this year.»
- the last project maybe done in an other way or with limited and more concrete literature »

30. Additional comments

- Thank you for a greate course :)»
- very good course, thank you!!»
- good that we have been most times relatively free in our decission for the project topic below the head topic»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.42
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.42
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.8

Kursutvärderingssystem från