|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Introduction to communication engineering, SSY121, HT11Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2011-10-12 - 2011-10-25 Antal svar: 26 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 56% Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.88 - i had decided from the begining i would take the exam on january» (At most 15 hours/week) 2. How many of the following course parts did you attend?Matrisfråga- Exercise 3 can be simpler in beginning.
Exercise sections and lectures were Good.
Recap of previous lecture was really useful.» Lectures
Genomsnitt: 4.65 Exercise sessions
Genomsnitt: 4.38 Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals? (learning outcomes)26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.46 - Very short compared to the course content.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.04 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - (regarding the project test)» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent have the following course elements been of help for your learning?Matrisfråga- Great lectures and exercises in general. The TA:s did a great job, they were very helpful» Course book
Genomsnitt: 2.69 Document "Working in projects"
Genomsnitt: 2.42 Document "Exercises and exams"
Genomsnitt: 3.73 Lecture slides
Genomsnitt: 3.65 Lectures by Fredrik Brännström
Genomsnitt: 3.73 Guest lecture by Pär Mattisson
Genomsnitt: 2.65 Exercise sessions by Johnny Karout
Genomsnitt: 3.73 Exercise sessions by M. Reza Khanzadi
Genomsnitt: 2.8 7. To what extent did the project help you learn about ...Matrisfråga- The project was great in that you got a full understanding of the whole communication system. Seeing it work in reality is nice» designing a communication system?
Genomsnitt: 3.5 teamworking?
Genomsnitt: 2.8 running a real-life development project?
Genomsnitt: 2.84 8. Can the disposition of the exercise sessions be improved?26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.42 - Please solve more problems at class... as more problems trigger more questions in mind which we wouldnt have thought of before.» (Yes, by demonstrating more problem solutions.) 9. The project was defined through a set of requirements to fulfill, with some freedom to choose your own working style and methods. Which type of project do you prefer?26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.15 - The project was great. The way this was done, we had to think through every stage ourselves. I also appreciate that the emphasis lay on getting the job done, and not writing a long report about it in the end.
However, the project quiz was not well done in my opinion. See remarks on this below» (The type of project used in this course) 10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.61 - The new student portal doesn"t seem to work perfectly !» (Rather badly) Study climate11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.61 - They could have been better at answering e-mails.» (Rather poor) 12. How was the course workload?26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 13. Was the course workload uniformly distributed over the study period? (If not, comment.)26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.23 - That was probably our fault, but we worked a lot more at the end of the project than at the begginning.» (No) 14. How was the total workload this study period?26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.69 - High because of the project» (High) Summarizing questions15. What is your general impression of the course?26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.53 - The quiz was not well done, long questions which took too long to understand together with extra information to try and trick you meant you had to guess on some questions.» (Good) 16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- the project, the handouts, the disponibility of the professor»- exercise and project» - Project» - Lectures by Fredrik Exercise Sessions by Johnny Karout.» - Especially the project worked great, and was very rewarding in terms of learning» - Project» - the project. This is a good proj for student helping us to understand the basic technique of this course.» - The team ! (Fredrik, Reza and Johnny) The slides which are very clear and simple to understand even if Communication engineering was new for some people» - The project» - Project.» - The organisation of the course» - The project and the exercise sessions. » - project» - Johnny Karout !» - the project» - The Exercise sessions are very helpfull.» - printed course notes» - Project, but keep a close eye to groups where members are lacking, cause it creates a lot of work for the rest.» - It"s good how the project resembles real-life software development. » 17. What should definitely be changed to next year?- More interactive exercice sessions. More matlab sessions : 2 isn"t enough...»- Exercise 3 Matlab programming. Though it was very useful the structure needs change» - Project - Different topic» - The project test. First of all it was too short of time to finish it. I felt really stressed and didn"t have time to really understand all the questions. And the fact there was no option to ask questions was not good. Any way you look at it, some things can always be misunderstood. Secondly, it did test a lot more than just what we did in the project. It was more like a minitest of the course. The problem is, this is not what it was said to be like. I for example wrote all the code in our project myself (this is not good teamwork, but it is th eway it turned out), and I obvioulsy knew how every detail in the communication system worked. At the test however, I had a hard time understanding 50% of the questions. Had I known this, I would have studied more from the book/exercises» - dont know..» - More exerice problems in the class. Definetly this would trigger more questions atleast from the people who are intrested.» - Some minor details. Like exercise sessions (I would like to see more problem-solving).» - The lecture slides. There should be more detailed information in the lecture slides. » - quiz, it is more time critical than testing the knowledge learnt, some of my friends really understood the concepts very well but failed the quiz because they cant handle the hard time limit of quiz» - don"t need to change» - the exercises, they should be more like the examination questions» - More counseling for the project would be nice.» - give more details about advanced communication systems,like MIMO,OFDM» - Remove a lot of formulas and proofs. And course material needs a review, a lot of unnessesary things in my opinion. It should be intro.» 18. Additional comments- i"m glad i took this class!»- Project Quiz could have been more technical related to project instead of project base» - Fredrik, Johnny and Reza was very good in Answering the questions that we asked during project and exercise sessions.» - in general, this is a good course. both theory and practical skill of communication are fulfilled. I am satisfy!» - This course took most of my time in this period due to the project. May be because it is my very frist course of my master program and I"ve never did a project before, also I"m not good at coding. So it"s been a hard time for me. What if you change the project to an easier one, maybe that would be more suitable for new students like me.» - no»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11%