Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Random signals analysis, MVE136, HT11

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-10-11 - 2011-10-25
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 40%
Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 10%
Around 20 hours/week»2 20%
Around 25 hours/week»4 40%
Around 30 hours/week»1 10%
At least 35 hours/week»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- Gradually increasing. More during labs and before exam.» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 30%
100%»7 70%

Genomsnitt: 4.7

- The exercise sessions were not helpful at all due to that the leader lacked pedagogy.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 10%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»7 70%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 55%
No, the goals are set too high»4 44%

Genomsnitt: 2.44

- It seems the course planner think that all in the class has the same background. (diploma chalmers EE last year) and sets planning accordingly. There are many different background to take consideration to when forming the first basic steps of the course. If you dont get that and fall behind it is hard to come back.» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 55%
Yes, definitely»4 44%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.44

- There were proofs, and yet it was not a "proof-course"» (To some extent)
- Maybe there should be several, shorter exam questions to test a larger span of the course» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»3 30%
Large extent»5 50%
Great extent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- It felt very theoretical compared to the exam.» (Some extent)
- Some extra comments of text could be nice to clarify. When looking up definitions on wikipedia I got a fully covered explanation. Otherwise there are many 3-letter short words. PDF, CDF, WSS......» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»2 20%
Some extent»3 30%
Large extent»3 30%
Great extent»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Never read it. Just did exercises.» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 10%
Rather well»6 60%
Very well»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- It would be nice if time edit were updated according to the actual classes.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

10 svarande

Very poor»1 10%
Rather poor»3 30%
Rather good»1 10%
Very good»4 40%
I did not seek help»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- I think the tutorial needs to be improved. In my world of learning you need the theory and then applied in a real task. More of examples.» (Very poor)
- Fast replies on emails, perfect!» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»6 60%
Very well»4 40%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

11. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 50%
High»2 20%
Too high»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- Very high on labs and before exam, perhaps I should have been studying more evenly throughout the course.» (Adequate)
- It was high mainly because of the laborations taking so much time to do. We had to start early without proper background knowledge. When we finally got the knowledge it was so close to the deadline that we wouldn"t have time to finish.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 10%
High»6 60%
Too high»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

- Always much to do at Chalmers. The way it should be, im here to learn.» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»1 10%
Fair»2 20%
Adequate»2 20%
Good»4 40%
Excellent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- I passed the exam but I still have no idea of what the course wanted to teach.» (Poor)
- Patrick and Lennart are good teatchers but it was too difficult to follow all proofs and hard stuff.» (Adequate)
- The teachers did a good job, but the course material was a bit too narrow and some parts would have gained from beeing presented in a more applied sense.» (Adequate)
- Many things have been seen before, and it was good to get a recap and also elaborations.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- labs»
- The lectures and assignments»
- The labs where good.»
- Tutorial»
- most of it»
- The lab-assignments.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The exercise session: it was too slow and we didn"t had time to do all the exercises and it has a bad impact on the examination, since some exercises that we were suppose to correct were not corrected and were in the exam.»
- The material for the laborations should be thought before handed out. All lectures should involve some kind of applied example instead of having everything in the end.»
- Me and my friend did not attend many exercise sessions. These sessions where not bad, but did not entirely met our demands. So a good nights rest was more at hand. Not sure exactly what to change to make it better. It would perhaps be harsh to imply that it was mainly due to the exercise teacher, but it would also be very much true.»
- May be more counselings for the lab or project.»
- teaching methods in exercise course»
- More examples and less workload and proofs. Give us the tools not the toolbox!»
- Less letters, more numbers. Theoretical topics and proofs should be left for mathematicians. »
- More emphasis on the random processes.»

16. Additional comments

- Very interesting content!»
- nothing»
- The signal parts should be introduced earlier and probably integrated more with the theory. Maybe extend the signal analysis part.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från