|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Random signals analysis, MVE136, HT11Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2011-10-11 - 2011-10-25 Antal svar: 10 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 40% Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.1 - Gradually increasing. More during labs and before exam.» (Around 20 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.7 - The exercise sessions were not helpful at all due to that the leader lacked pedagogy.» (75%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.44 - It seems the course planner think that all in the class has the same background. (diploma chalmers EE last year) and sets planning accordingly. There are many different background to take consideration to when forming the first basic steps of the course. If you dont get that and fall behind it is hard to come back.» (No, the goals are set too high) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.44 - There were proofs, and yet it was not a "proof-course"» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.6 - It felt very theoretical compared to the exam.» (Some extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.5 - Never read it. Just did exercises.» (Small extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.2 - It would be nice if time edit were updated according to the actual classes.» (Rather well) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.1 - I think the tutorial needs to be improved. In my world of learning you need the theory and then applied in a real task. More of examples.» (Very poor) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.4 11. How was the course workload?10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.8 - Very high on labs and before exam, perhaps I should have been studying more evenly throughout the course.» (Adequate) 12. How was the total workload this study period?10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.2 - Always much to do at Chalmers. The way it should be, im here to learn.» (High) Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.2 - I passed the exam but I still have no idea of what the course wanted to teach.» (Poor) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- labs»- The lectures and assignments» - The labs where good.» - Tutorial» - most of it» - The lab-assignments.» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The exercise session: it was too slow and we didn"t had time to do all the exercises and it has a bad impact on the examination, since some exercises that we were suppose to correct were not corrected and were in the exam.»- The material for the laborations should be thought before handed out. All lectures should involve some kind of applied example instead of having everything in the end.» - Me and my friend did not attend many exercise sessions. These sessions where not bad, but did not entirely met our demands. So a good nights rest was more at hand. Not sure exactly what to change to make it better. It would perhaps be harsh to imply that it was mainly due to the exercise teacher, but it would also be very much true.» - May be more counselings for the lab or project.» - teaching methods in exercise course» - More examples and less workload and proofs. Give us the tools not the toolbox!» - Less letters, more numbers. Theoretical topics and proofs should be left for mathematicians. » - More emphasis on the random processes.» 16. Additional comments- Very interesting content!»- nothing» - The signal parts should be introduced earlier and probably integrated more with the theory. Maybe extend the signal analysis part.»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10%