|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Power System Analysis, ENM050Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2011-10-10 - 2011-10-30 Antal svar: 29 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 45% Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.1 - I should have studied much, because I felt the lack of explanation during lectures.» (Around 30 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.34 - I usually attend 100%, this is the first time in four years I think it wasn"t worth it. The lectures where more than confusing. Changing subject, teachers all the time. Having teachers talking Swinglish, Per Norberg cannot hold the transformer part one more year - it"s embarrassing for Chalmers! He surly is very good at the subject, but that dosn"t matter at all when he can"t be understood! Teaching is not only about knowleadge, teaching itself is a very big part as well. The teachers need to talk to each other, make the course feels like one and not many small confusing parts. For example, Lina (really good at teaching but focusing on the wrong stuff) spent time on very basic stuff. Not all in the beginning of the course, some in the beginning, then some weeks later there were lectures on "per unit". It was weeks since we had done tutorials on this and it wasn"t intresting to spend time on things you already know. Peiyuan were the outstanding best teacher! The tutorials were beneath contempt, you couldn"t here what Shemsedin said, you coudn"t see what he was writing, his subscript letters where as big as all the others, making it impossible to follow the exersices! Even when we skipped the tutorials and instead looked at the soloutions online it was a hard time following what happens in the calculation, making many steps at once, not telling what happens.» (50%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the learning outcomes?27 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.03 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - Don"t know, I have seen them but I don"t remember» (?) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.15 - The overall subject is utmost important, covering 40% of basic even sufficient knowledge for power engineers. But we have not seen any goals, just have the list of topics after the completion » (Yes, the goals seem reasonable) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?27 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.96 - Having big mass of material I just need more time to prepare for the exam.» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.03 - Lina is a really bad teacher. Doesn"t seem to know anything. Peyuan was great and Tuan was a bit hard to understand. » (Small extent) 7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.35 - The compendium contenu less details» (Some extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.96 - Information about groups for the project and the laboratory demonstration were given very late and even the TimeEdit schedule for the demonstrations were wrong until the last minute.» (Rather badly) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - Would be good to have class room time for only questions. For example divide a tutorial into one houre exercise at the board and one hour free work and time to ask questions» (Rather poor) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.57 11. How was the course workload?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.89 - High due too poor explanatory work done and lots of material delivered. The amount of topics could be feasible in case we had sufficient material explanation» (High) 12. How was the total workload this study period?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.89 Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.86 - The subject in itself is very intresting but the course could have been SO much better. The organisation, some of the teachers there are so much to improve. I do not want to be rude or sound harsh but this is probably in the bottom three of all courses I have read at Chalmers and I do not think a master course should be placed this low. It is a shame when the subject is very intresting. » (Poor) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Peiyuan Chen! He is one of the best teachers I have had in a long time. Enthusiastic, talks WITH the students, stringent, speaks English well, knows his subject, has an intuitive feeling for good didactic (excellent thing to include calculation examples in the lectures, keeps students alert and I had actually learnt the stuff after that class!).»- Peyuan» - Tuan and Pe Yuan as lecturer» - The project was ok, though the paper about the project has to be rewritten to next year since a lot of parts were wrong in it. And PowerWorld was really bad. Lina and Peiyuan! =)» - The project, Shemsedin as tutor and Tuan and Peiyuan as lecturers.» - The design project was useful and illustrative. The project supervisor was helpful. Every lecturer/tutor was friendly and available for questions. The lectures on transmission lines were well-taught. The exams focused on understanding and did not contain many calculations (that would be hard to manage with the unpractical calculator). The exam exercises were relevant to the teaching content. The compendium was up to the point.» - More advanced calculators should be allowed which can solve matrix, complex number, basic equations,. This basic mathematical concepts are clearly known and are not the essence of the course. so there is no logic to lose more time doing computation rather than conceptualizing the problem.» - I believe that the teaching method of the long transmission lines and of the symmetrical and unsymmetrical faults should remain the same.» - The powerworld case. But improved guidance. And the exercises.» - Lecturer Peyoan was the best lecturer I"ve heard.» - Peiyuan and the project, that was fun even though Powerworld was a rather "buggy" program.» - Peiyuan Chen » - To create more times for tutorials» - I would preserve everything but assigned one or two more dedicated teachers to cover several topics in this course» - I think, that better explanation could has been in some topics, which are closely related to a real life (practice). » 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Per Norberg. Teaching at a master"s level should require three things of the person doing the teaching: knowledge of the particular subject, a certain level of English proficiency, as well as didactic skills. Per Norberg definitely has the first, knowledge of the subject. I really appreciated some of his teaching due to his industry perspective, valuable. His didactic skills are not very good, rather average, but still ok. However, when it comes to English proficiency it falls way below what"s acceptable. I am Swedish myself so I have nothing against Swedes speaking English. However, students from all over the worlda are attending this course. Some have payed huge amounts of money to get an education of a certain quality, and THEY have to supply proof of their knowledge of English. It is obvious that the same requirement (or preferably higher) should be put on the teaching staff. Per Norberg would most probably do a good job teaching in a Swedish speaking class. Listening to him in an English speaking class however, is not a pleasure. Furthermore, such a situation is actually embarrassing for Chalmers, since it will be part of forming a picture of Chalmers in the mind of the students, a picture which will be spread to people all over the world. If we (Chalmers) want to be a well renowned university worldwide, things like those have to be changed.»- Remove Lina» - minimize the course module a bit so that student can give enough time to understand each things clearly» - Change the simulation program powerworld since it always crash and doesn"t work well. More introduction and handouts for the design project since many havn"t seen the program before and doesn"t understand it that well.» - All teachers should be well prepared about what material they are about to go through.» - Per Norberg cannot hold the lectures on transformer. Shemshedin should practise to write on the board so it"s readable. The teachers should talk to each other on what the leactures is about, making the course easier for the students with a red line. The compendium is very poor, an other course compendium would be good. » - Lina and Per as lecturers and better administration.» - The lectures on transformers were very hard to follow. The handed-out material on transformers was very hard to study. The hand-writing was bad and the style chaotic. The tutorials often lacked synchronization with the lectures. The content of tutorials included too many calculations/ formalism. This made them tiring and not so interesting. The main lecturer insisted a bit too much on too basic/too theoretically-oriented things. » - The lectures should get prepared before getting in class» - In my opinion, the way of teaching the numerical methods, p.u. basis and transformers should be changed. Most chapters were covered through tutorials without laying strong foundations during lectures » - Number of lecturers (too many now) and some of the lecturer.» - Transformer"s Lecturer» - change the lecturers (especialy the transformer"s lecturer)» - The lecturer who held the transformer lectures should make pdf format of his lectures if he"s going to put it on the webpage, because you can"t read his handwriting.» - The transformer part, as it is now students will not learn this part.» - Tutorials should be in close proximity and to and AFTER there respective lectures. Power-point is good for showing pictures and bad for showing complex derivations of formulas.» - The lectures that we had in the beginning about transformers needs some changes. The slides were messy, it was difficult to go through them on your own (hard to read!). Better lecturer?» - Many of the tasks in the exercises was very big and timeconsuming, perhaps it had been better to use more simpler tasks and step by step handle more complicated tasks. » - Need to be changed 1)the structure of material expanding it to sufficient level 2)the sequence of lectures and tutorials (the tutorial must follow the lecture and not inversely) 3)the interaction of teachers with students (some teachers were not able to answer directly to the point trying to obviously skirt the answer instead)» - I don"t want to offend anybody, I have really enjoyed my studies, but Lina Bertling was not enough compitent in this course. » 16. Additional comments- In my opnion the course have been very hard and I had a hard time understanding the different chapters. Maybe there could be a way to make the teaching easier to understand.»- I wonder what all the exchange student think about Chalmers after this first very poor quarter...I"m ashamed Chalmers isn"t better than this!» - There are quite a few bugs in the version of PowerWorld Simulator used in this course. The software needed to be constantly reset and restarted to function as expected.» - The course from its nature contains calculations that software is supposed to perform. Students should be discharged from these calculations to the largest possible extent. More emphasis needs to be given to the concepts and ideas behind the calculations.» - There are should be more practical related works than more theories. Exams should test the understanding and how one can apply the knowledge in real life and not the capacity of cramming and reproducing the materials taught. » - The course should offer to the students the opportunity to work with a more challenging project. I realized that it is easier and more practical to learn through creating your own network and by searching information in the textbooks to ensure that you follow the correct path.» - Could have been a very good and interesting course if it were not for the lecturers. Good arrangement otherwise.» - This is the first course in on the master program of electrical engineering and as it is now it isn"t good advertising for those people coming from outside Sweden. The first courses should be excellent so that foreign students are blown away of how good Chalmers is. This year that did not happen......» - Difficulties to get a grip of/"swallow" the whole material for a student.» - I want to thank Tuan and Shemsedin for cooperation and good work.» Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.67
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6%