Visa resultat

Advanced Chemical Reaction Engineering 2011, KBT115

1. What type of student are you?

Master student»		16		88%
Exchange student»		2		11%
Other»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.11

- Now I feel stuipd. That"s cleared it up for me» (Exchange student)

2. If you are a Master student - are you?

Swedish»		14		82%
International»		3		17%

Genomsnitt: 1.17 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

3. Gender

Female»		4		23%
Male»		13		76%

Genomsnitt: 1.76 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 1.47

Your own effort

4. How many hours per week did you spend on this course? We mean total time, i.e. in and out of class. Estimate an average over the entire study period.

At most 15 hours/week»		5		27%
Around 20 hours/week»		8		44%
Around 25 hours/week»		4		22%
Around 30 hours/week»		1		5%
At least 35 hours/week»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.05 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

5. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

0%»		0		0%
25%»		0		0%
50%»		2		11%
75%»		3		16%
100%»		13		72%

Genomsnitt: 4.61 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- had some scheduling conflicts with other course» (50%)
- I had lectures in another course.» (50%)
- Now I feel stuipd. That"s cleared it up for me» (75%)

6. Were the course goals reasonable considering your background?

No, the goals were set too low»		0		0%
Yes, the goals seemed reasonable»		18		100%
No, the goals were set too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2

7. Did the assignments, project and comprehension test assess whether you reached the goals?

No, not at all.»		0		0%
To some extent»		4		22%
Yes, definitely»		13		72%
No opinion»		1		5%

Genomsnitt: 2.83 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Now I feel stuipd. That"s cleared it up for me» (To some extent)
- The comprehension test seemed a bit to detailed.» (To some extent)
- Difficult assigments, but in a good way. I have not done the test jet» (Yes, definitely)
- The project was a little bit hard without help from teachers, and in my group the attending to those 4-5 lessions were rather poor. And we divided the tasks, and then when we should out it togher none understood the whole program until very late... Assignments were really good, can be good to say that they take long time thou. » (Yes, definitely)
- The exam however, in my opinion, was really hard. Did not really cover the big "parts" of the course.» (No opinion)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.16

Teaching and course administration

8. How was the subject coverage of the lectures?

They covered too little material»		1		5%
About right»		15		83%
They covered somewhat too much material»		1		5%
They covered too much material»		1		5%
Don"t know/did not attend»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.11 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- we put focus at some parts, and many of them were not so big at the exam...» (About right)
- Now I feel stuipd. That"s cleared it up for me» (They covered too much material)

9. To what extent did the lectures help your learning?

Small extent»		2		11%
To some extent»		3		16%
Large extent»		9		50%
Great extent»		4		22%

Genomsnitt: 2.83 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

10. Overall how would you rate the quality of the lectures?

Poor»		0		0%
Fair»		2		11%
Adequate»		1		5%
Good»		11		61%
Excellent»		4		22%

Genomsnitt: 3.94 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Now I feel stuipd. That"s cleared it up for me» (Fair)

11. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		1		5%
To some extent»		7		38%
Large extent»		6		33%
Great extent»		4		22%

Genomsnitt: 2.72 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- mostly used the lectur slides» (To some extent)
- The reading materials were really good, it is reassuring to know that most things we have doubts about in the lectures notes are there. They are a good back up.» (To some extent)
- Now I feel stuipd. That"s cleared it up for me» (Large extent)
- The extra reading material is very good. Goes into detail from the lectures.» (Large extent)

12. Did the course literature and handout material adequately cover the course content?

No, it was inadequate.»		2		11%
Yes, it was adequate.»		16		88%
No opinion»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.88 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Now I feel stuipd. That"s cleared it up for me» (Yes, it was adequate.)
- The pdf:s on stability and fluid/fluid were adequate, but not the solid/fluid part.» (Yes, it was adequate.)

13. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Very badly»		0		0%
Rather badly»		1		5%
Rather well»		9		50%
Vey well»		8		44%

Genomsnitt: 3.38 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Now I feel stuipd. That"s cleared it up for me» (Rather badly)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.81

Course Project

14. What was your project topic?

Water-gas Shift (WGS)»		4		23%
Preferential Oxidation (PROX)»		4		23%
Methyl ethyl ketone Production (MEK)»		9		52%
Other»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.29 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

15. What was your general impression of the course project?

Very Negative»		2		11%
Mostly Negative»		7		41%
Mostly Positive»		8		47%
Very Positive»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.35 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- it was quite diffuclt to understand the code, if the commenting would have been moore extensive it would have helped» (Mostly Negative)
- Hard to get an overview what the program really did when so many matlab files interacted » (Mostly Negative)
- Took 5 hours just to find constants. Thats time that could be spent on a slightly more difficult project.» (Mostly Negative)
- Really hard to find diffusivity constant. Maybe it is not supposed to be a big part of the projekt, took a lot of time.» (Mostly Negative)
- Now I feel stuipd. That"s cleared it up for me» (Mostly Positive)
- Quite good project for the amount of time given. I would have appreciated a small presentation about the theory of the project (explanations on the equations used for instance)» (Mostly Positive)
- There was a slow start with just trying to find different constants, which made us running out of time in the end, where we would have liked to spend more time trying to optimize the system.» (Mostly Positive)
- It was to difficult, the code was difficult to understand, so much time was needed to understand the code. More commenting» (Mostly Positive)

16. Did the course project contribute to your understanding of transport limitations and reactor design for catalytic reactions?

No, not at all.»		3		17%
A small contribution.»		10		58%
A large contribution.»		4		23%
A very large contribution, ie much better than lectures etc.»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.05 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Interesting for the understanding of the design of a reactor, and the parameters influencing the catalytic reactions» (A small contribution.)
- The program was quite complex and hard to understand fully, although it did help to some extent to understand how different reactions interact. » (A small contribution.)
- The project mainly, in my opinion, concerned the fiddling of matlab code.» (A small contribution.)
- Now I feel stuipd. That"s cleared it up for me» (A large contribution.)

17. How well did collaboration work within your project group?

Very poorly»		0		0%
Reasonably well»		8		44%
Very well»		10		55%
No opinion»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.55 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Now I feel stuipd. That"s cleared it up for me» (Reasonably well)
- we had problem getting everyone at the same place, and that was not good, hard to work alone and at separate time and place...» (Reasonably well)

18. Did the use of MATLAB for simulations in the project hinder your progress? If you answer yes please explain why in comments.

Yes, very much»		1		5%
Yes, to some extent»		3		16%
No, not so much»		9		50%
No, not at all»		5		27%
No opinion»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- We never work on matlab before in our beachelor program.» (Yes, very much)
- Now I feel stuipd. That"s cleared it up for me» (Yes, to some extent)
- it was hard to get, but on the other hand it would have taken longer time to program self» (Yes, to some extent)
- Although we had a basic knowledge of matlab it took time to figure out where the code was wrong when it wasn"t working. » (Yes, to some extent)
- I know matlab quite well, but the use of structures was new to me» (No, not so much)
- Mostly because my level in Matlab is not as good as it is supposed to be. But I think this software suits really well for this project» (No, not so much)
- There could be a bit more comments in the MatLab code of what the different equations do..» (No, not so much)

19. Was the objective for your project clearly defined?

No, not at all»		2		11%
Yes, it was adequate»		16		88%

Genomsnitt: 1.88 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- objective said nothing about optimizing, should be doing that...» (No, not at all)
- Now I feel stuipd. That"s cleared it up for me» (Yes, it was adequate)

20. How was the quality of instruction and help that you recieved for the project?

It was very poor»		0		0%
It was poor»		8		44%
It was good»		10		55%
It was very good»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.55 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- instructions, poor, help, good. isn"t something you would have done without help...» (It was poor)
- I think mohammad had too little knowledge about what the project"s objective were» (It was poor)
- The help was OK, but I think adding a few sessions in the schedule could be beneficial» (It was poor)
- Now I feel stuipd. That"s cleared it up for me» (It was good)
- Although I think we could have been provided with values of different constants so that we could have concentrated on the objectives.» (It was good)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.39

Study Climate

21. In the course how were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Very poor»		0		0%
Rather poor»		1		5%
Rather good»		4		22%
Very good»		11		61%
I did not seek help»		2		11%

Genomsnitt: 3.77 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Now I feel stuipd. That"s cleared it up for me» (Rather poor)

22. How was the course workload?

Too low»		1		5%
Low»		1		5%
Adequate»		11		61%
High»		5		27%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.11 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Now I feel stuipd. That"s cleared it up for me» (Low)
- The assignments took a lot of time since I couldn"t attend the lectures.» (High)

23. How was the total workload this study period?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		1		5%
Adequate»		6		33%
High»		5		27%
Too high»		6		33%

Genomsnitt: 3.88 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Now I feel stuipd. That"s cleared it up for me» (High)
- I study 150%» (High)
- I read 150% this period, so it was quite much» (High)
- studied 150%» (Too high)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.59

Summarizing Questions

24. What is your general impression of the course?

Very poor»		0		0%
Poor»		2		11%
Adequate»		2		11%
Good»		12		66%
Excellent»		2		11%

Genomsnitt: 3.77 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Now I feel stuipd. That"s cleared it up for me» (Poor)
- I would say between good and excellent» (Good)
- one of the best» (Excellent)

25. Do you think the course should cover more or fewer topics?

More»		1		5%
Reasonable as it is»		16		88%
Fewer»		1		5%

Genomsnitt: 2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Now I feel stuipd. That"s cleared it up for me» (Reasonable as it is)

26. What should definitely be preserved next year?

27. What should definitely be changed next year?

28. Additional comments: